OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider comparison

OWASP and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. OWASP is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2, while Rapid7 is ranked #31. OWASP holds a 3.4% mindshare in SAST, compared to Rapid7’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OWASP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

OWASP Zap

Read 41 OWASP Zap reviews

7,440 Views
6,845 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews

1,598 Views
975 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OWASP Zap

Rapid7 AppSpider

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

OWASP Zap and Rapid7 AppSpider are prominent tools in the security software category. Based on feature offerings and support, Rapid7 AppSpider holds the upper hand due to its advanced features and professional support, appealing to enterprise users willing to invest for better security solutions.

Features: OWASP Zap is free and open-source with extensive community-driven features, making it suitable for small teams. It offers wide-ranging support for different scanning configurations and customizable alerts. Rapid7 AppSpider provides advanced automation, user-friendly dashboards, and enhanced vulnerability identification, catering to organizations needing comprehensive security capabilities.

Room for Improvement: OWASP Zap could enhance scanning speed, user configurations, and integration support. Rapid7 AppSpider needs to address integration enhancements, improve the accuracy of scan results by reducing false positives, and streamline its user interface for more intuitive navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OWASP Zap supports straightforward deployment with minimal setup requirements, though it lacks dedicated customer support. Rapid7 AppSpider involves a more intricate deployment process but provides professional support, making it attractive to enterprises seeking reliable customer service resources.

Pricing and ROI: OWASP Zap, as an open-source tool, offers low setup costs and the potential for high ROI with adequate user expertise. Rapid7 AppSpider requires a higher investment due to its commercial nature but promises strong ROI through its feature set and comprehensive support, which can be appealing for large enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed OWASP Zap vs. Rapid7 AppSpider Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OWASP Zap vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OWASP Zap

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rapid7 AppSpider

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of OWASP Zap is 3.4%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OWASP Zap	3.4%
Rapid7 AppSpider	0.7%
Other	95.9%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Nithin-K

Technical Analyst at Hexaware Technologies Limited

Open source testing tool empowers manual activities and has room to improve integration and reporting features

The improvement that has to be done for APIs focuses on manual activities where the feature exists, but it is not at the same level as what Burp Suite does with intercepting and tools such as Postman, so it needs improvement. There are limitations with authentication levels, particularly with form-based and cookie-based authentication. However, overall, we are satisfied with OWASP Zap as there are no major issues, and improving the scan engine could be beneficial. When comparing OWASP Zap and Burp Suite, the main difference besides pricing is that OWASP Zap has limitations with reporting levels and UI, which affects its reporting capabilities, whereas Burp Suite is already advancing with new AI features and scanning capabilities that OWASP Zap seems to be lacking.

Read full review

Hiroshi Watanabe

Marketing Expert at J's communication

Clients benefit from broad authentication and effective crawling but need localization improvements

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The vulnerabilities that it finds, because the primary goal is to secure applications and websites."

"The API is exceptional."

"The reporting is quite intuitive, which gives you a clear indication of what kind of vulnerability you have that you can drill down on to gather more information."

"Simple to use, good user interface."

"The community support that ZAP provides me, as an open source, provides me flexibility and is convenient to use."

"The interface is easy to use."

"OWASP is quite matured in identifying the vulnerabilities."

"The reporting is quite intuitive, which gives you a clear indication of what kind of vulnerability you have that you can drill down on to gather more information."

More OWASP Zap pros

"It is really accurate and the rate of false positives is very low."

"Rapid7 AppSpider is good at managing different applications. It uses applets and generates reports to cover the PCA/GDPR compliance requirements."

"The solution is highly stable, rated at ten out of ten."

"Rapid7 AppSpider is good at managing different applications. It uses applets and generates reports to cover the PCA/GDPR compliance requirements."

"This solution is a leader in the industry."

"It does a scan that performs about 100 checks on web applications and produces a clear report on all of the vulnerabilities that are found."

"When it is set up properly, it can do scanning on web apps with multiple engines automatically."

"It scans all the components developed within a web application."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

Cons

"The technical support team must be proactive."

"As security evolves, we would like DevOps built into it. As of now, Zap does not provide this."

"Online documentation can be improved to utilize all features of ZAP and API methods to make use in automation."

"The forced browse has been incorporated into the program and it is resource-intensive."

"There are too many false positives."

"Too many false positives; test reports could be improved."

"The disadvantage of Zap is that we're unable to customize reports as it only has a single standard format."

"Zap could improve by providing better reports for security and recommendations for the vulnerabilities."

More OWASP Zap cons

"It needs better integration with mobile applications."

"This price of this solution is a little bit expensive."

"Support response times are slow and can be improved."

"The solution is too slow. It could take a full day to scan. Competitors are much faster."

"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."

"Implementing Rapid7 AppSpider requires scanning and self-identification mechanisms. You can add different types of authentication to each scan."

"AppSpider could improve in the area of integration. They need to add more integration opportunities."

"The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution and can be used free of charge."

"It's free and open, currently under the Apache 2 license. If ZAP does what you need it to do, selling a free solution is a very easy."

"It is highly recommended as it is an open source tool."

"OWASP Zap is free to use."

"The tool is open-source."

"It's free. It's good for us because we don't know what the extent of our use will be yet. It's good to start with something free and easy to use."

"As Zap is free and open-source, with tons of features similar to those of commercial solutions, I would definitely recommend trying it out."

"This app is completely free and open source. So there is no question about any pricing."

More OWASP Zap pricing and cost advice

"The price is pretty fair."

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about OWASP Zap?

The best feature is the Zap HUD (Heads Up Display) because the customers can use the website normally. If we scan websites with automatic scanning, and the website has a web application firewall, i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OWASP Zap?

OWASP might be cost-effective, however, people prefer to use the free edition available as open source.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.

See all answers

Comparisons

Acunetix vs OWASP Zap

Compared 13% of the time

SonarQube vs OWASP Zap

Compared 12% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OWASP Zap

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OWASP Zap

Compared 8% of the time

Veracode vs OWASP Zap

Compared 8% of the time

More OWASP Zap Competitors

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 12% of the time

SonarQube vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 6% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OWASP Zap

March 2026

Download OWASP Zap product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider

March 2026

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Also Known As

No data available

AppSpider

Overview

OWASP Zap is a free and open-source web application security scanner.

The solution helps developers identify vulnerabilities in their web applications by actively scanning for common security issues.

With its user-friendly interface and powerful features, Zap is a popular choice among developers for ensuring the security of their web applications.

OWASP

SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

1. Google 2. Microsoft 3. IBM 4. Amazon 5. Facebook 6. Twitter 7. LinkedIn 8. Netflix 9. Adobe 10. PayPal 11. Salesforce 12. Cisco 13. Oracle 14. Intel 15. HP 16. Dell 17. VMware 18. Symantec 19. McAfee 20. Citrix 21. Red Hat 22. Juniper Networks 23. SAP 24. Accenture 25. Deloitte 26. Ernst & Young 27. PwC 28. KPMG 29. Capgemini 30. Infosys 31. Wipro 32. TCS

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

OWASP Zap vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

March 2026

Free Report: OWASP Zap vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

Find out what your peers are saying about OWASP Zap vs. Rapid7 AppSpider and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OWASP Zap vs. Rapid7 AppSpider report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.