Kentik vs LiveNX comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Kentik and BlueCat are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Kentik is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.7, while BlueCat is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.0. Kentik holds a 1.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to BlueCat’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kentik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

Kentik

Read 22 Kentik reviews

8,718 Views
7,497 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LiveNX

Read 10 LiveNX reviews

6,678 Views
4,875 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Kentik

LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

LiveNX and Kentik are both prominent network performance monitoring tools. Despite LiveNX's competitive pricing and support, Kentik stands out with its comprehensive features, offering a significant advantage for detailed network analytics.

Features: LiveNX focuses on visual network traffic analysis, root cause identification, and performance optimization. Its strong points include end-to-end visibility, helping businesses monitor and manage traffic effectively. Kentik offers extensive data retention, enhanced anomaly detection, and robust traffic insights. The advanced analytics and customization capabilities of Kentik make it more suitable for in-depth traffic analysis.

Room for Improvement: LiveNX could benefit from enhanced customization options, more granular data retention capabilities, and advanced anomaly detection features. For Kentik, while its comprehensive analytics are beneficial, improvements in user interface simplification, more straightforward deployment processes, and expanded reporting options could enhance its usability further.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveNX is praised for its straightforward deployment and solid support services that assist with network monitoring setup. However, Kentik's cloud-based implementation reduces infrastructure demands but may require more initial configuration effort. Despite this, Kentik's flexibility in deployment and customer-focused support gives it a slight advantage in adaptability over LiveNX.

Pricing and ROI: LiveNX is recognized for its accessible pricing, leading to quicker ROI through effective monitoring and resource allocation. Although Kentik involves a higher setup cost, its powerful analytics and long-term value justify the investment for detailed traffic analysis. Kentik's pricing matches its service offerings, delivering substantial long-term ROI potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Kentik vs. LiveNX Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kentik vs. LiveNX

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kentik

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (10th)

LiveNX

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

28th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Kentik is 1.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveNX is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kentik	1.5%
LiveNX	1.0%
Other	97.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Gcecilio

Network Engineer at a media company with 51-200 employees

Traffic insights have reduced transit costs and support secure, direct connections with providers

The best features that Kentik offers are the ability to identify traffic end-to-end and to know which transit is used, if it goes through any other transit, to see the entire flow, from the subscriber to the content provider and vice versa, from the content provider to the subscriber.I can also determine whether it is symmetric or asymmetric traffic, and if it goes through any provider that has some kind of bottleneck. That is very important. Regarding the security part, which is also possible to handle through Kentik, you can configure it in a way that makes the network more secure and reduces the amount of dirty traffic or attacks received. Kentik has had a high positive impact on my organization. Besides the cost reduction, it has been possible to perform troubleshooting more effectively, and also regarding DDoS-related attacks. In addition to cost reduction, we had a more reliable connection. Since the moment we identified that it was possible to have a direct connection with content providers like CDN77, Cloudflare, and Akamai, we established a direct connection there through a PNI with these content providers, making the network less dependent on an IP transit provider.

Read full review

Ashwani Bansal

Senior Solution Consultant at Orange

Network management and diagnostics improved through effective monitoring and reporting capabilities

The solution is handy. I have not used that particular feature. Maintenance is required for the system. If you want to use something on the endpoints or end-user devices, then using LiveAction LiveNX in place of other tools would be quite beneficial. The solution impacts operational costs and resources. On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I really love the Data Explorer. I use it all the time to go in and craft exactly what I need to see. I'm able to then take that story and explain it to the executives. I've done that a couple of times and it is helpful."

"Technical support is second to none."

"We haven't seen anything else that comes even close to Kentik's real-time visibility across our network infrastructure, and we've demo'ed everything under the sun."

"The most valuable features have been anything around traffic engineering: being able to determine the source or destination of a surge of traffic, whether it's DDoS-related, or a customer just happened to have a sudden uptick in traffic. Being able to tell where that's coming from or where it's going to enables us to do things based on that."

"Good NetFlow visualization and analysis tools are valuable to anybody who needs to understand the traffic that flows in and out the network."

"In terms of the solution’s real-time visibility across our network infrastructure, I have not been able to find any other monitoring or netflow visualization tool that gives me the kind of information I get from Kentik. If I need to take a deep-dive into something that I see, it's really easy for me to do that. Whereas with most other things, I have to use five or six other tools to get that kind of data, with Kentik, I have it all in one place."

"We have been extremely happy with the features; they were exactly what we were after."

"I am able to do a lot of work on the visualization end to create different visualizations and different ways to get information out of it."

More Kentik pros

"There are many positive attributes, and it's the best of the best."

"If you're looking for a tool that will solve your problems in a short period of time more effectively, LiveNX is the right tool."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great, but it is far, far away from good and perfect."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

More LiveNX pros

Cons

"Kentik can be improved by enhancing the alerting system, especially the way templates work and the hierarchy of these alerts."

"The product could strive for more improvements to become closer to perfect."

"We had faced some issues during an outage and were not able to get the desired results from Kentik tools. It took time to resolve these issues, which is why I give them eight points."

"Currently, the way I'm configuring it uses reactive alerts, which means alerts are triggered when an issue occurs. I would prefer more proactive alerts in the future."

"Version 4 of the platform is good and going in the right direction."

"The only downside to Kentik, something that I don't like, is that it's great that it shows you where these anomalies lie, but it's not actionable. Kentik is valuable, don't get me wrong, but if it had an actionable piece to it..."

"Sometimes, the tool has complications, so we must deal with the additional support from the tool's end."

"We asked for a way, regarding the potential networks that exist, to hook Kentik up with external tools like peering DBs to correlate things together and see what we can do... This is all in the [next] beta now."

More Kentik cons

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions."

"They have some unique functionality but they need to create a more simplified UI."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"My advice to others would be to run away from it. This is a slight exaggeration but this is more because the application is horrible, the stability is horrible, the performance is horrible and the support is horrible."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"Maintenance is required for the system."

"The only downside to this software is the price; it's a very pricey solution and very expensive, and it requires a good amount of resources in terms of server memory."

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

More LiveNX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"We have an annual contract with Kentik that we renew each year for a set number of licenses. We also have some burstable licenses which we can spin up and spin down, and those are paid as they are used."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"It's very expensive."

"We use the free version."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Media Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kentik?

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been limited because I was not responsible for that in my company, but I have spoken with my boss, and he reported that the licensing mode...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kentik?

Kentik can be improved by enhancing the alerting system, especially the way templates work and the hierarchy of these alerts.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kentik?

My main use case for Kentik is as a network monitoring system and flow analysis tool. A specific example of how I use Kentik for network monitoring is monitoring devices or services that go down an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The solution could be enhanced by implementing custom patterns for each customer.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

The customers use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management purposes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LiveAction LiveNX?

I work as an integrator with LiveAction LiveNX. Most customers prefer deploying it on premises rather than in the cloud. The advanced diagnostics capabilities, including flow-based surveillance and...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs Kentik

Compared 6% of the time

DX Spectrum vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kentik

Compared 4% of the time

LibreNMS vs Kentik

Compared 4% of the time

More Kentik Competitors

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs LiveNX

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveNX

Compared 5% of the time

Nmap vs LiveNX

Compared 4% of the time

ThousandEyes vs LiveNX

Compared 4% of the time

LiveSP vs LiveNX

Compared 3% of the time

More LiveNX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kentik

October 2026

Download Kentik product report

Buyer's Guide

LiveNX

October 2026

Download LiveNX product report

Also Known As

No data available

LiveNX

Overview

Kentik provides real-time visibility into network infrastructure, focusing on monitoring, data visualization, and flow analysis to manage traffic patterns efficiently.

With robust analytics capabilities, Kentik offers insights into BGP peering status, aids in DDoS detection, and allows for detailed telemetry through its intuitive interface. The platform's SaaS nature simplifies operations by eliminating server maintenance concerns. Multi-vendor support and synthetic testing enhance network security and performance by simulating customer scenarios, while its API offers automation for querying and reporting tasks.

What are the key features of Kentik?

Real-Time Visibility: Monitors network infrastructure effectively.
Data Visualization: Offers powerful tools for viewing complex data.
Flow Analysis: Analyzes traffic flow for optimal management.
BGP Peering Insights: Provides in-depth peering status checks.
DDoS Alerting: Notifies about potential DDoS threats.
Data Explorer: Aids in understanding traffic patterns.
Synthetic Testing: Simulates scenarios to enhance security and performance.

What benefits can be found in user reviews?

Automation: Users value the flexibility of its API for automating tasks.
Ease of Use: SaaS model streamlines user engagement, eliminating server maintenance.
Flexibility: Report customization and query settings are highly appreciated.
Enhanced Observability: Telemetry and multi-vendor support increase oversight.

Industries implement Kentik for network monitoring, traffic management, and flow data analysis across both on-prem and cloud setups. It proves valuable for detecting DDoS events, managing peering relationships, and optimizing costs, besides managing CDN configurations and performing synthetic tests in diverse environments.

Kentik

LiveNX enables real-time network monitoring with a graphical interface, offering detailed reports and advanced integration for comprehensive analysis and efficient network management.

LiveNX provides intuitive tools for real-time issue identification and resolution, leveraging advanced integration with platforms like Cisco SD-WAN to enhance network performance analysis. Through features such as visual analytics and QoS modeling, LiveNX supports capacity management planning and operational efficiency, although it requires improvements in pricing, resource efficiency, and web interface functionality. Users value its insights into traffic patterns, enabling optimization and proactive issue resolution.

What are the key features of LiveNX?

Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates immediate issue identification.
Graphical Interface: Enhances user experience with detailed visualization.
Integration Capabilities: Supports platforms like Cisco SD-WAN for comprehensive analysis.
Visual Analytics: Provides insights into traffic patterns.
QoS Modeling: Aids in planning and maintaining service quality.
Custom Templates: Offers personalized network management tools.

What benefits should users look for?

Proactive Issue Resolution: Enables early detection and solving of network problems.
Comprehensive Analysis: Assists in understanding and managing network performance.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances overall network management processes.
Traffic Optimization: Improves service quality and network utilization.

Industries use LiveNX to monitor and troubleshoot network performance, manage traffic, and ensure QoS across on-premises and cloud environments. It is particularly valued for its ability to visualize and optimize network traffic, which is crucial for maintaining service quality.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

Pandora, Yelp, Neustar, Box, University of Washington, Zoom, Tata, and Cogent.

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Buyer's Guide

Kentik vs. LiveNX

November 2026

Free Report: Kentik vs. LiveNX

Find out what your peers are saying about Kentik vs. LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kentik vs. LiveNX report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.