We performed a comparison between Juniper vSRX and Sophos Virtualization Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Trend Micro, Sophos, Juniper and others in Virtualization Security."There are a few valuable features that offer very good quality on the solution. Especially NetScreen. We used to use NetScreen for the the product line. It was a very mature solution, very robust, easy to configure, easy to manage, etc. It made it easy to do everything."
"The tool's most valuable features are routing features and service quality."
"The technical support services are excellent."
"It is easy for me to go in and update settings, make changes, or add/remove rules or security."
"The solution has good features."
"The features we found most valuable are using the IDS and IPS during protection. The application filtering feature is great."
"The initial setup was very straightforward. There was no problem. The initial deployment took about one hour."
"The most valuable features are application filtering, content filtering, the intrusion prevention system (IPS), and definitely the application firewall."
"The SVM deployment has very good performance."
"The most valuable features of the solution are VM security, VLP, and threat protection."
"I like Sophos Virtualization Security's built-in antivirus and malware protection. The firewalls are pretty stable. It's just a matter of updating the virus signatures, and they're pretty good about providing those updates regularly."
"Using this solution allows us to set up rule-based access control."
"When it comes to their firewall, it notified me about a possible infection."
"They could provide support for cloud deployments."
"he stability could be improved."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the GUI because it isn't very good."
"Right now, we are going through issues and problems where the product gets dropped with the connection or during the authentication initial phase. While it could be our problem, we would like to see more stability in this area."
"The user interface could always be better. They could make it simpler and more intuitive."
"Some people complain that the solution tends to have a steep learning curve. It could be because most people have basic familiarity with Cisco or other similar products and maybe have never worked closely with Juniper products."
"Fortinet is more user friendly than Juniper. In terms of remote access, I actually prefer using Fortinet. It's much easier to configure."
"The solution could improve its technical support."
"Sophos Virtualization Security requires more usage. For example, if you have a virtual service line of 100 nodes, you are unable to deploy them from the console to a particular environment."
"I would like to see some new features for improving the security part of the solution."
"The solution would be improved if all of the advanced features were included in the SVM."
"I wish Sophos could offer the solution at a lower price, but I doubt they will."
"We are unable to reliably specify bandwidth limits for particular clients, which is something that needs to be improved."
More Sophos Virtualization Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Juniper vSRX is ranked 3rd in Virtualization Security with 30 reviews while Sophos Virtualization Security is ranked 2nd in Virtualization Security with 5 reviews. Juniper vSRX is rated 7.8, while Sophos Virtualization Security is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Juniper vSRX writes "Fast with good usability and fairly scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Virtualization Security writes "Stable security and VPN solutions". Juniper vSRX is most compared with Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Azure Firewall, Meraki MX, Cisco Secure Firewall and Zscaler Cloud Firewall, whereas Sophos Virtualization Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security.
See our list of best Virtualization Security vendors.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
