We performed a comparison between Juniper vSRX and Trend Micro Deep Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtualization Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a very powerful solution and the firewalls offer high performance"
"The technical support has been good."
"This solution works well. Their switches and firewall are good."
"The authentication part is seamless and easy for people."
"It is deployed on the customer site, and we manage the firewalls on this side."
"The product’s quality and performance are better than other vendors."
"We like the solution’s protocol and its dashboard system."
"The tool's most valuable features are routing features and service quality."
"Easy to scale, stable solution for workload and server security and protection. It's easy to set up and has a good ransomware protection feature."
"Deep Security's most valuable features are antivirus and host intrusion detection."
"There's useful monitoring on offer."
"One of the most valuable features is that it's a firewall-based solution. We just open the required reports to the server—to server communication—and that's how we use Deep Security."
"Very straightforward and very easy to implement."
"It provides a comprehensive feature set and a strong security baseline for us with integrations into other security tools."
"The performance is good."
"The vulnerability scanning reduces false positives by quite a bit."
"We experienced some technical issues during implementation"
"Fortinet is more user friendly than Juniper. In terms of remote access, I actually prefer using Fortinet. It's much easier to configure."
"I've talked to people that say Juniper now, as a device, can be a solution for a data center, but in the past, I have not seen this as being possible."
"VPN access is an area that needs improvement."
"The GUI interface needs improvement."
"Juniper vSRX is expensive."
"It could use more tutorials."
"The tool's basic license does not cover everything. It needs to improve visibility and availability."
"Post-implementation is time-consuming. You have to do monitoring, and that takes time. After you set up everything, it's not a full-fledged implementation. You have to keep on monitoring and configuring."
"The email relays and proxies could be improved."
"The implementation can be inflexible and not easy, as it requires knowledge of things like virtualization and administration on Windows."
"I would like to see XDR features and endpoint sensor become available."
"We'd like to see extended capacity in the on-premises versions."
"f it had the capability of generating retroactive alerts it would be helpful."
"Trend Micro Deep Security security and scalability could be improved."
"Some of the reporting and integrations could be more robust."
Juniper vSRX is ranked 3rd in Virtualization Security with 30 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 80 reviews. Juniper vSRX is rated 7.8, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Juniper vSRX writes "Fast with good usability and fairly scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "Offers excellent endpoint protection and great stability ". Juniper vSRX is most compared with Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Azure Firewall, Meraki MX, Cisco Secure Firewall and Zscaler Cloud Firewall, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint. See our Juniper vSRX vs. Trend Micro Deep Security report.
See our list of best Virtualization Security vendors.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.