Jira vs OpenText AccuRev comparison

Atlassian and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Atlassian is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #22. Atlassian holds a 11.2% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Jira

Read 282 Jira reviews

19,738 Views
9,672 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText AccuRev

Read 8 OpenText AccuRev reviews

881 Views
872 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jira

OpenText AccuRev

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Jira and OpenText AccuRev are competing in the project management and software version control categories, respectively. Jira has an edge in pricing and deployment ease, while OpenText AccuRev stands out for its specialized features aimed at robust version control capabilities.

Features: Jira provides comprehensive project management features including customizable workflows, agile reporting, and extensive third-party tool integration. OpenText AccuRev delivers advanced version control utilities with its stream-based architecture and superior parallel development capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Jira could enhance its version control capabilities and improve performance issues during scale-ups. More sophisticated reporting and analytics features could benefit power users. OpenText AccuRev would benefit from expanding its cloud deployment options and improving user interface design. Accelerating the initial setup process could also make it more user-friendly for new adopters.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jira offers a flexible cloud-based deployment with a fast setup and extensive online resources. It suits remote teams due to its ease of integration with various tools. OpenText AccuRev involves a more complex on-premise setup suitable for organizations requiring strict control over their ecosystems, supported by dedicated customer service catering to specific enterprise needs.

Pricing and ROI: Jira features flexible subscription plans with competitive pricing, providing a quick ROI thanks to its adaptability and low entry costs. It appeals to budget-conscious teams who need immediate access to project management tools. OpenText AccuRev demands higher initial investments but offers long-term value for organizations needing advanced version control, resulting in a favorable ROI where these features are crucial.

To learn more, read our detailed Jira vs. OpenText AccuRev Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. OpenText AccuRev

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,915 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jira

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

282

Ranking in other categories

Application Requirements Management (2nd), Project Management Software (1st)

OpenText AccuRev

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Jira is 11.2%, down from 21.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText AccuRev is 1.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jira	11.2%
OpenText AccuRev	1.2%
Other	87.6%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Akhil Viswam

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Agile workflows have streamlined sprint planning and tracking for faster feature delivery

Jira has a very good interface and it is very easy to manage sprints, tasks, and epics. The main feature is the hierarchy, as features can be converted into epics and topics, allowing bigger tasks to be partitioned into smaller ones. The hierarchy feature in Jira helps the team significantly compared to other tools that have been used, such as Trello, which is mainly useful only for a waterfall model. For modern Agile practices, Jira is the most adapted tool in the industry. Another valuable feature is that Jira APIs have been used for data science projects to analyze tasks and get insights. This has also been very helpful in the project.

Read full review

Sameh-Hablas

CEO - Director General & Founder Ai/ IT Expert - Digital Transformation at Al Danah Information Systems Solutions

Helps us with our compliance goals, native quality management systems and with the legacy systems in our organization

To improve the product, it needs some enhancement to the application's interface to be more user-friendly. The product has all the features that we need and we can depend upon it. My issue with the product is that it is not easy to use without a guide or a proper manual. That is my point. It is not very friendly to use. For example, we may need the application to be more friendly in other sorts of ways. If we have an integrated module that allows access to the features we want through one click, you do not need to make it two or three clicks on the screen. The interface can be better designed to easily provide access to the features you need. The feature I would like to see in the next release is just for it to be more friendly to use and to be like a smart application that intuits your movement through the application. It needs to be something that works smoothly and intelligent without any complicated navigation of screens.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found the most valuable features of Jira to be ticketing, life cycle workflow, definition, and creation. Many of the features are useful."

"With the help of Jira, tasks are less likely to remain stagnant for a long time."

"Jira has been a good l tool for collaborating across large groups of people. The JQL feature is powerful and easy to use."

"We are able to track the development work for a particular story or set of stories through the Kanban board easily."

"I have found Jira to be stable."

"Jira has been designed with a focus on task achievement, is instantly usable, and is flexible to work with."

"I can use Jira Query Language (JQL) to write queries to see the stories that are there for the current sprint. I can also sort them by assignment. I also use Jira is for burndown charts, which give an indication of how efficiently the squad is performing. I also use the Active Sprints function and a feature called Planning Poker."

"We are using Jira for our test management, recording our inspecting results, and regulating the evidence in the report."

More Jira pros

"The solution is 100% scalable. It's much more scalable than the customer's capacity for implementing it. We do plan to increase usage ourselves."

"Easy to use on Window platform."

"The most valuable feature is the Business Process Testing feature, BPT, because it brings in the most revenue."

"I have used many solutions throughout my career, but this is the best there is."

"We have seen a bonified return on investment."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is taking snapshots while doing the execution of the test cases."

"The solution is very scalable and it's been quite scalable for our organization's purpose."

"The solution is 100% scalable, and it's much more scalable than the customer's capacity for implementing it."

More OpenText AccuRev pros

Cons

"From a testing point of view, I would rate it at a six out of ten. I use it as a defect management tool, and for me, it's not easy to use."

"In Jira, sometimes developers are not getting alerts when Jira is moving out of the SLA to the product development team."

"The solution lacks integration with visualization tools like Power BI or Tableau, which would be beneficial for better insights."

"it would be helpful to have a better tutorial for learning and to have a better understanding of what the features are and what they do."

"The Classic UI is a little bit messy. UX experience is also a little bit messy and is not according to the expectation of a tech user."

"Backlog pruning and visualization are poor."

"Sometimes, it is slow and hangs. We faced some stability issues where JIRA was down for a day. Also, we have lost some of our comments made in the JIRA because of downtime."

"Their support should be improved. They should be faster and more knowledgeable."

More Jira cons

"Because AccuRev is a centralized SCM, Microfocus will always need to work to improve performance relative to distributed SCM."

"What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code."

"The pricing should be more competitive."

"Source code conflicts are like evil twins."

"In the next release, I would like to have a repository for the code which is embedded. Apart from that, it has everything I need."

"The pricing should be more competitive."

"It is difficult to gain experience with the product because resources and documentation for learning are not available."

"What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code. Something like Git, for example. Some sort of depository for the code that is embedded."

More OpenText AccuRev cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Jira is expensive and a lot of people are choosing DevOps because they are cheaper, open-source, easy to use, and have basic licenses. Jira should decrease its price to be more competitive."

"The price of the solution could be less expensive. We pay annually for the solution."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. It's paid yearly."

"We used to be on a perpetual license provided by our clients."

"The cost is about $10 per user, per month."

"I don't have the number, but I sure wish Jira was less expensive. Its price point should be a little lower, and it should be more flexible for users who are just ticket viewers."

"I understand JIRA is quite expensive."

"It does not cost that much."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

"It is a lower cost than other top competetors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,915 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Construction Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	108
Midsize Enterprise	60
Large Enterprise	152

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

Jira itself is fairly priced for the features it provides, but pricing is a bit higher than some alternatives, mostly because many plugins and add-ons are paid and licensed per user. So even if onl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Jira

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 5% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

Asana vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

monday.com vs Jira

Compared 3% of the time

More Jira Competitors

TFS vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 21% of the time

GoCD vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 13% of the time

Digital.ai Agility vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 8% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText AccuRev Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jira

May 2026

Download Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AccuRev

April 2026

Download OpenText AccuRev product report

Also Known As

Jira Software

Micro Focus AccuRev, AccuRev

Overview

Jira is a comprehensive tool favored by teams for its ability to streamline project management and enhance Agile workflows. Its versatile features, such as customization options and integration capabilities, enable efficient task management and collaboration.

Jira supports Agile methodologies through its adaptability and robust functionalities. Teams benefit from its customizable workflows, enabling seamless integration with third-party applications. Despite its complexity in customization and interface challenges, Jira is invaluable for sprint planning, backlog management, and issue tracking. It provides strong reporting tools, though some users highlight areas for improvement in documentation and stability. It's especially useful for IT, development, and marketing teams to maintain productivity and effective collaboration.

What are the key features of Jira?

Customization: Allows crafting specific workflows and processes tailored to team needs.
Agile Compatibility: Supports Scrum and Kanban boards for efficient Agile practices.
API Integration: Offers robust integration options with numerous plugins and tools.
Reporting Tools: Provides detailed analytics for informed sprint planning and tracking.

What benefits should users expect from Jira?

Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates communication and teamwork across departments.
Improved Task Management: Streamlines tracking of tasks and issues for projects.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse team requirements through customizable features.
Efficiency: Boosts productivity with support for Agile methodologies.

Jira's implementation in software development and project management sectors underscores its suitability for managing complex projects. Its use extends to QA and marketing for organizing workflows and ensuring effective task distribution. Despite some areas needing refinement, Jira remains integral for teams aiming to boost collaboration and maintain streamlined project processes.

Atlassian

OpenText AccuRev offers a robust and reliable approach to software configuration management, making it an essential tool for teams who prioritize efficient and detailed version control.

OpenText AccuRev stands out due to its stream-based architecture, helping teams manage complex codebases seamlessly. It supports parallel development, facilitating the streamlined management of simultaneous projects. Its scalability ensures seamless adaptation to changing team sizes and project demands.

What are the key features of OpenText AccuRev?

Stream-based architecture: Enables efficient management of branching and merging.
Parallel development: Supports multiple code paths for concurrent project work.
Scalability: Adapts to team size and project complexity effortlessly.
Time-based visualizations: Enhances understanding of project history and changes.
Enterprise-level security: Ensures safe and secure data handling practices.

What benefits should users evaluate in OpenText AccuRev?

Improved team collaboration: Facilitates smooth workflows among development teams.
Increased efficiency: Streamlines processes and reduces manual overhead.
Enhanced control: Offers precise management over project changes and iterations.
Cost savings: Reduces resources needed for managing complex projects.

OpenText AccuRev is implemented across industries like software development, finance, and telecommunications to manage large-scale applications. Its adaptability has made it a go-to option where change management and version control are critical for project success.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

Akcelerant, SDL, CSG, Avid Technology Inc., Azimuth Systems Inc, Drivecam, Endgame, f5 Networks, Follett Software, Hyland Software, Indanet, Kronos, McAfee

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. OpenText AccuRev

April 2026

Free Report: Jira vs. OpenText AccuRev

Find out what your peers are saying about Jira vs. OpenText AccuRev and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,915 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jira vs. OpenText AccuRev report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.