We performed a comparison between Jira and OpenText AccuRev based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The layout, workflow, automation, and metrics are helpful in Jira."
"Overall, the solution is very nice and has a variety of great features."
"We use it for capacity planning. We need to gauge and assess whatever is coming to our pipeline and then everything comes to the pipeline, appears as a pic, and then based on that, we create the story points and we take it from there."
"The flexibility to create different flows is most valuable."
"Has a good dashboard with good tracking features."
"Perfect for keeping track of large amounts of bugs, tasks queries and releases for fixes."
"I like it for team collaboration and task management. I also like its analytics and dashboards."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The solution is 100% scalable. It's much more scalable than the customer's capacity for implementing it. We do plan to increase usage ourselves."
"The product has all the features that we for application managementat a lower cost."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is taking snapshots while doing the execution of the test cases."
"The most valuable feature is the Business Process Testing feature, BPT, because it brings in the most revenue."
"I would like to see test execution modules."
"It is not intuitive."
"I find the dashboard to be Jira's most problematic feature."
"I would like to have a future-proof idea of the cost and the roadmap for my class."
"I am not sure if Jira can be integrated with our ERP. We have our ERP for the cost estimates or measurements. It would be nice if we can check or view a plan with the real cost. Currently, we have to do a double check of costs. It would be better to be able to integrate it with Jira."
"Scripts should be more readily available for implementing projects."
"It lacks features to cover all testing aspects, so we often integrate it with other plugins or tools like X-ray."
"So at one point in time, they did a huge UI upgrade. At that time, I felt like they had changed something, so it was hard to figure out. Now that we are habituated, it's not an issue now."
"The pricing should be more competitive."
"In the next release, I would like to have a repository for the code which is embedded. Apart from that, it has everything I need."
"It is difficult to gain experience with the product because resources and documentation for learning are not available."
"What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code. Something like Git, for example. Some sort of depository for the code that is embedded."
Earn 20 points
Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 262 reviews while OpenText AccuRev is ranked 23rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Jira is rated 8.2, while OpenText AccuRev is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText AccuRev writes "Good packaging features, but reporting is limited". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas OpenText AccuRev is most compared with Jama Connect.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.