OpenText AccuRev vs OpenText Application Quality Management comparison

OpenText AccuRev and OpenText Application Quality Management are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText AccuRev is ranked #22, while OpenText Application Quality Management is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1. OpenText AccuRev holds a 0.1% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText Application Quality Management’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText AccuRev users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText Application Quality Management users who would recommend it.

OpenText AccuRev

Read 8 OpenText AccuRev reviews

235 Views
235 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Application Qualit...

Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews

5,145 Views
3,396 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OpenText AccuRev

OpenText Application Qualit...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 20, 2025

OpenText AccuRev and OpenText Application Quality Management are competing in the software development lifecycle domain. OpenText Application Quality Management has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, offering greater value for its price.

Features: OpenText AccuRev provides robust version control capabilities, efficient configuration management, and process automation. It also offers reliable support for cross-promotion between streams and custom applications for merge and difference engines. OpenText Application Quality Management stands out with test management features, including test planning, analysis, requirement management integration, defect tracking, and reporting improvements, making it superior in managing application quality.

Room for Improvement: OpenText AccuRev could enhance its GUI for better user-friendliness, improve integration capabilities with modern tools, and refine its test management functionalities. OpenText Application Quality Management might need improvements in handling large sets of test data, addressing scalability challenges in extensive deployments, and streamlining reporting efficiency for large projects.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management offers a cloud-based deployment model, allowing flexible integration and comprehensive customer support for seamless implementation. OpenText AccuRev, traditionally on-premise, is noted for its quick setup and consistent support. However, Application Quality Management's flexibility and scalability in deployment make it more attractive.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText AccuRev is recognized for its economical setup costs, providing significant ROI from its change management solutions. OpenText Application Quality Management, despite a higher initial investment, delivers substantial returns due to its advanced quality management capabilities, which align with modern agile practices. Its extended functionality justifies the investment for organizations prioritizing comprehensive quality assurance.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText AccuRev

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText AccuRev is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 5.4%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Sameh-Hablas

CEO - Director General & Founder Ai/ IT Expert - Digital Transformation at Al Danah Information Systems Solutions

Helps us with our compliance goals, native quality management systems and with the legacy systems in our organization

To improve the product, it needs some enhancement to the application's interface to be more user-friendly. The product has all the features that we need and we can depend upon it. My issue with the product is that it is not easy to use without a guide or a proper manual. That is my point. It is not very friendly to use. For example, we may need the application to be more friendly in other sorts of ways. If we have an integrated module that allows access to the features we want through one click, you do not need to make it two or three clicks on the screen. The interface can be better designed to easily provide access to the features you need. The feature I would like to see in the next release is just for it to be more friendly to use and to be like a smart application that intuits your movement through the application. It needs to be something that works smoothly and intelligent without any complicated navigation of screens.

Read full review

Hosney Osman

Senior Operation Engineer at Vodafone

Service provider recognizes effective project tracking and reporting capabilities

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlenecks. As for the scalability of OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, there are limitations, particularly in agile methodologies, which is currently my main concern.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the Business Process Testing feature, BPT, because it brings in the most revenue."

"The solution is 100% scalable. It's much more scalable than the customer's capacity for implementing it. We do plan to increase usage ourselves."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is taking snapshots while doing the execution of the test cases."

"The product has all the features that we for application managementat a lower cost."

"It allows us to easily make linkage and dependencies, with plenty of integrations."

"I love to use this solution with single projects. It has helped our productivity. With the metrics that I receive, I can put them onto the management model so I can see them there. It has reduced our time for project management and controls by 20 percent."

"What they do best is test management. That's their strong point."

"I found the ease of use most valuable in Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. Creating test cases is easier because the solution allows writing in Excel."

"It is stable and reliable."

"The AI and functionality interface are useful."

"OpenText ALM Quality Center is highly customizable."

"It is beneficial for managing testing data and has integration with Excel, allowing us to download reports easily."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pros

Cons

"In the next release, I would like to have a repository for the code which is embedded. Apart from that, it has everything I need."

"The pricing should be more competitive."

"What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code. Something like Git, for example. Some sort of depository for the code that is embedded."

"It is difficult to gain experience with the product because resources and documentation for learning are not available."

"Is not very user-friendly."

"One drawback is that ALM only launches with the IE browser. It is not supporting the latest in Chrome... It should be launched for all of the latest browsers."

"Quality Center's ability to connect all the different projects to reflect status and progress is quite complicated. We may develop something because there are so many projects. Right now, I have to do something which Quality Center is really not designed for: over reporting. This is a very big problem right now. We may develop some controls, but it is problem at the moment. I love Quality Center for individual projects to work with it. However, if you have a lot of projects for Quality Manager to do cross reporting on many projects, then it's almost impossible. It takes a lot of time."

"The extract format is not ideal, splitting expected results into three line items, making interpretation difficult."

"The initial setup was not straightforward."

"It is pricey."

"Cross project reporting is limited to similar database schemas"

"We operate in Sweden, and there are not so many Swedish people that know the product."

More OpenText Application Quality Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a lower cost than other top competetors."

"The cost of licensing depends on the number of VMs that you are running test cases on and it is not cheap."

"Depending on the volume, the annual maintenance costs vary on a percentage but it's around $300 a year per license for maintenance. It's at 18% of the total cost of the license."

"The solution is priceed high."

"It allows us to keep our costs low. I do not want to pay beyond a certain point for this solution."

"For pricing, I recommend to buy a bundled package. Check the HPE site for more details."

"The full ALM license lets you use the requirements tab, along with test automation and the Performance Center. You can also just buy the Quality Center edition (Manual testing only), or the Performance Center version (Performance Testing only)."

"ALM Quality Center is a little bit costly."

"I've never been in the procurement process for it. I don't think it is cheap. Some of the features can be quite expensive."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 12% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AccuRev

August 2025

Download OpenText AccuRev product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management

August 2025

OpenText Application Quality Management report

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus AccuRev, AccuRev

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

Overview

Get the governance and compliance capabilities you need to manage complexity. OpenText AccuRev helps you implement modern development practices at enterprise scale.

OpenText

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Akcelerant, SDL, CSG, Avid Technology Inc., Azimuth Systems Inc, Drivecam, Endgame, f5 Networks, Follett Software, Hyland Software, Indanet, Kronos, McAfee

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.