Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText AccuRev vs OpenText Application Quality Management comparison

OpenText AccuRev and OpenText Application Quality Management are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText AccuRev is ranked #23, while OpenText Application Quality Management is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText AccuRev holds a 0.4% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText Application Quality Management’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText AccuRev users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText Application Quality Management users who would recommend it.
OpenText AccuRev
Read 8 OpenText AccuRev reviews
  • 298 Views
  • 298 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Application Qualit...
Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews
  • 5,181 Views
  • 3,316 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 20, 2025

OpenText AccuRev and OpenText Application Quality Management are competing in the software development lifecycle domain. OpenText Application Quality Management has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, offering greater value for its price.

Features: OpenText AccuRev provides robust version control capabilities, efficient configuration management, and process automation. It also offers reliable support for cross-promotion between streams and custom applications for merge and difference engines. OpenText Application Quality Management stands out with test management features, including test planning, analysis, requirement management integration, defect tracking, and reporting improvements, making it superior in managing application quality.

Room for Improvement: OpenText AccuRev could enhance its GUI for better user-friendliness, improve integration capabilities with modern tools, and refine its test management functionalities. OpenText Application Quality Management might need improvements in handling large sets of test data, addressing scalability challenges in extensive deployments, and streamlining reporting efficiency for large projects.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management offers a cloud-based deployment model, allowing flexible integration and comprehensive customer support for seamless implementation. OpenText AccuRev, traditionally on-premise, is noted for its quick setup and consistent support. However, Application Quality Management's flexibility and scalability in deployment make it more attractive.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText AccuRev is recognized for its economical setup costs, providing significant ROI from its change management solutions. OpenText Application Quality Management, despite a higher initial investment, delivers substantial returns due to its advanced quality management capabilities, which align with modern agile practices. Its extended functionality justifies the investment for organizations prioritizing comprehensive quality assurance.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText AccuRev
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
23rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Application Qualit...
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
208
Ranking in other categories
Quality Management Software (4th), Test Management Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText AccuRev is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 4.9%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management4.9%
OpenText AccuRev0.4%
Other94.7%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

Sameh-Hablas - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps us with our compliance goals, native quality management systems and with the legacy systems in our organization
To improve the product, it needs some enhancement to the application's interface to be more user-friendly. The product has all the features that we need and we can depend upon it. My issue with the product is that it is not easy to use without a guide or a proper manual. That is my point. It is not very friendly to use. For example, we may need the application to be more friendly in other sorts of ways. If we have an integrated module that allows access to the features we want through one click, you do not need to make it two or three clicks on the screen. The interface can be better designed to easily provide access to the features you need. The feature I would like to see in the next release is just for it to be more friendly to use and to be like a smart application that intuits your movement through the application. It needs to be something that works smoothly and intelligent without any complicated navigation of screens.
Read full review
Hosney Osman - PeerSpot reviewer
Service provider recognizes effective project tracking and reporting capabilities
Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlenecks. As for the scalability of OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, there are limitations, particularly in agile methodologies, which is currently my main concern.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is 100% scalable. It's much more scalable than the customer's capacity for implementing it. We do plan to increase usage ourselves."
"The product has all the features that we for application managementat a lower cost."
"The most valuable feature is the Business Process Testing feature, BPT, because it brings in the most revenue."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is taking snapshots while doing the execution of the test cases."
"It is beneficial for managing testing data and has integration with Excel, allowing us to download reports easily."
"The test-case repository and linkage through to regression requirements will absolutely be a key component for us. We haven't got it yet, but when we've got an enterprise regression suite, that will be a key deliverable for them. We will be able to have all of the regression suite in one place, linked to the right requirements."
"The most valuable Quality Center feature, I find, is the solution's integration with some of our automation tools. For us, the ability to capture and record and the ease of use from a user perspective, are all key."
"The solution's support team was always there to help."
"It was really good, customizable, and easy to use."
"I like that it integrates with the Jira solutions."
"What's most valuable in Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is that it's useful for these activities: test designing, test planning, and test execution."
"Test Execution (Test Lab): This allows us to track our manual tests with date and time and enter actual results and screenshots."
More OpenText Application Quality Management pros
 

Cons

"The pricing should be more competitive."
"In the next release, I would like to have a repository for the code which is embedded. Apart from that, it has everything I need."
"What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code. Something like Git, for example. Some sort of depository for the code that is embedded."
"It is difficult to gain experience with the product because resources and documentation for learning are not available."
"There's room for improvement on the reporting side of things and the scheduling, in general, is a bit clunky."
"It can be quite clunky, and it can easily be configured badly, which I've seen in a couple of places. If it is configured badly, it can be very hard to use. It is not so easy to integrate with other products. I've not used Micro Focus in a proper CI/CD pipeline, and I haven't managed to get that working because that has not been my focus. So, I find it hard. I've often lost the information because it had committed badly. It doesn't commit very well sometimes, but that might have to do with the sites that I was working at and the way they had configured it."
"There is room for improvement in the scalability and stability of the solution."
"It is pricey."
"It is not a scalable solution."
"If the solution could create a lighter, more flexible tool with more adaptability to new methodologies such as agile, it would be great."
"HPE ALM’s out-of-the-box reporting can be perceived as rigid and limited, to an extent."
"ALM uses a waterfall approach. We have some hybrid approaches in the company and need a more agile approach."
More OpenText Application Quality Management cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a lower cost than other top competetors."
"The licensing fee is a little expensive."
"HPE has one of the most rigid, inflexible, and super expensive license models."
"If you have more than five users, a concurrent licensing model should be considered."
"The enterprise pricing and licensing are reasonable."
"The solution has the ability to handle a large number of projects and users in an enterprise environment with the correct license."
"Only major companies that can afford it use OpenText ALM."
"It has several limitations in adapting its agility easily."
"Depending on the volume, the annual maintenance costs vary on a percentage but it's around $300 a year per license for maintenance. It's at 18% of the total cost of the license."
More OpenText Application Quality Management pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Performing Arts
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business39
Midsize Enterprise32
Large Enterprise161
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 16% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 15% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 13% of the time
Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 11% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 4% of the time
More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText AccuRev
September 2025
OpenText AccuRev reportDownload OpenText AccuRev product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Application Quality Management
September 2025
OpenText Application Quality Management reportDownload OpenText Application Quality Management product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus AccuRev, AccuRev
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager
 

Overview

Get the governance and compliance capabilities you need to manage complexity. OpenText AccuRev helps you implement modern development practices at enterprise scale.

OpenText

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?
  • Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
  • Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
  • Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
  • Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
  • Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
  • Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
  • Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
  • Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Akcelerant, SDL, CSG, Avid Technology Inc., Azimuth Systems Inc, Drivecam, Endgame, f5 Networks, Follett Software, Hyland Software, Indanet, Kronos, McAfee
Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
Buyer's Guide
OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management
September 2025
Free Report: OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.