OpenText AccuRev vs OpenText Application Quality Management comparison

OpenText AccuRev and OpenText Application Quality Management are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText AccuRev is ranked #22, while OpenText Application Quality Management is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. OpenText AccuRev holds a 1.1% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText Application Quality Management’s 7.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText AccuRev users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText Application Quality Management users who would recommend it.

OpenText AccuRev

Read 8 OpenText AccuRev reviews

1,051 Views
1,051 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Application Qualit...

Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews

14,901 Views
9,090 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OpenText AccuRev

OpenText Application Qualit...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

OpenText AccuRev and OpenText Application Quality Management are competing products in software development optimization. OpenText Application Quality Management holds the upper hand with its advanced feature set.

Features: OpenText AccuRev offers strong version control capabilities, supports complex branching, and parallel development. OpenText Application Quality Management provides comprehensive testing tools, superior integration capabilities, and improved software quality control.

Room for Improvement: OpenText AccuRev could benefit from enhanced support responsiveness, expanded feature set, and more detailed documentation for users. OpenText Application Quality Management may improve its user interface for better navigation, require more frequent updates, and enhance cloud integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management is known for smooth deployment and robust customer service. OpenText AccuRev offers efficient deployment but could improve in support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText AccuRev is more economical upfront with a cost-effective setup. OpenText Application Quality Management, despite a higher initial cost, often results in a higher return on investment thanks to its extensive features and integration possibilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,588 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText AccuRev

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Quality Management Software (1st), Test Management Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText AccuRev is 1.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 7.2%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management	7.2%
OpenText AccuRev	1.1%
Other	91.7%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Sameh-Hablas

CEO - Director General & Founder Ai/ IT Expert - Digital Transformation at Al Danah Information Systems Solutions

Helps us with our compliance goals, native quality management systems and with the legacy systems in our organization

To improve the product, it needs some enhancement to the application's interface to be more user-friendly. The product has all the features that we need and we can depend upon it. My issue with the product is that it is not easy to use without a guide or a proper manual. That is my point. It is not very friendly to use. For example, we may need the application to be more friendly in other sorts of ways. If we have an integrated module that allows access to the features we want through one click, you do not need to make it two or three clicks on the screen. The interface can be better designed to easily provide access to the features you need. The feature I would like to see in the next release is just for it to be more friendly to use and to be like a smart application that intuits your movement through the application. It needs to be something that works smoothly and intelligent without any complicated navigation of screens.

Read full review

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

Manages multiple releases seamlessly

We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a user friendly UI which has been very much appreciated by our organization."

"AccuRev is a better tool in general."

"I have used many solutions throughout my career, but this is the best there is."

"The solution is very scalable and it's been quite scalable for our organization's purpose."

"The most valuable feature is the Business Process Testing feature, BPT, because it brings in the most revenue."

"Customer Service: Excellent. Our original pre-sales technical contact is now in a different position within the sales organization, but is still willing to field questions, and get the right resources involved to speed up the delivery of customer service."

"We have seen a bonified return on investment."

"Easy to use on Window platform."

More OpenText AccuRev pros

"You can do your development from start to finish: starting with the requirements, ending with defects, and testing in-between having everything in one tool and be able to validate everything up and down in the SDLC."

"We have had no stability issues so far."

"Requirements, testing, defect management, all integrated in one solution."

"The best thing is that you can see your current status in real time... To see real-time updates, you just log in to ALM and you can see exactly what the progress is. You can also see if the plan for the day is being executed properly, and it's all tracked. From the management side, I find those features very valuable."

"It gives me the ease of putting together the requirements, test cases, the release test schedules, and executing the test."

"The most beneficial feature of test management in this solution is its ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously."

"Because of global test documentation, testing can be resourced most effectively each test cycle (including outsourcing)."

"Defect management is very good."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pros

Cons

"Limited reporting features for management."

"It is difficult to gain experience with the product because resources and documentation for learning are not available."

"The tool has an issue whereby it restarts its services on its own."

"Source code conflicts are like evil twins."

"Because AccuRev is a centralized SCM, Microfocus will always need to work to improve performance relative to distributed SCM."

"What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code. Something like Git, for example. Some sort of depository for the code that is embedded."

"My issue with the product is that it is not easy to use without a guide or a proper manual."

"The pricing should be more competitive."

More OpenText AccuRev cons

"The reporting could be a little more robust."

"I frankly don't recommend Micro Focus solutions. The support is not good and the documentation is not consistent."

"It is not really user friendly and it is difficult to handle test speeds."

"The performance needs work, as over the past couple years, where I have worked with large companies, I noticed slower response times."

"Requirements management could be improved as the use is very limited. E.g., they have always stated that, "You can monitor and create requirements," but it has its limitations. That's why companies will choose another requirements management solution and import data from that source system into Quality Center. Micro Focus has also invested in an adapter between Dimensions RM and ALM via Micro Focus Connect. However, I see room for improvements in this rather outdated tool. I feel what Micro Focus did is say, "Our strategy is not to improve these parts within the tool itself, but search for supported integrations within our own tool set." This has not been helpful."

"It could be better by incorporating more spell checking and word processing functionalities in steps."

"The version of Micro Focus ALM that we use only works through Internet Explorer (IE). We have to communicate to everyone that they can only use IE with the solution. This is a big limitation. We should be free to use any type of browser or operating system. We have customers and partners who are unable to log into the system and enter their defects because they work on a different operating system."

"Performance issues are very common. The degradation of performance and consequent failures continuously happen."

More OpenText Application Quality Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a lower cost than other top competetors."

"It's a perpetual license."

"If you have more than five users, a concurrent licensing model should be considered."

"The enterprise pricing and licensing are reasonable."

"Most vendors offer the same pricing, though some vendors offer a cheaper price for their cloud/SaaS solution versus their on-premise. However, cloud/SaaS solutions result in a loss of freedom. E.g., if you want to make a change, most of the time it needs to be validated by the vendor, then you're being charged an addition fee. Sometimes, even if you are rejected, you are charged because it's a risk to the entire environment."

"The pricing is expensive nowadays."

"I'd rate the pricing as 3/10 as it's very expensive."

"I don't know the exact numbers, but I know it is pricey. When we talked to the sales reps we work with from our company, they say, "Well, Micro Focus will never lose on price." So, they are willing to do a lot of negotiating if it is required."

"It all comes down to how many people are going to access the tool. When teams go above 20, I think ALM is a better tool to use from a collaboration and streamlining perspective."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,588 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	161

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.

See all answers

Comparisons

Jira vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 22% of the time

TFS vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 20% of the time

GoCD vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 10% of the time

Digital.ai Agility vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText AccuRev Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 21% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 5% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

TFS vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AccuRev

June 2026

Download OpenText AccuRev product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management

June 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management report

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus AccuRev, AccuRev

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

Overview

OpenText AccuRev offers a robust and reliable approach to software configuration management, making it an essential tool for teams who prioritize efficient and detailed version control.

OpenText AccuRev stands out due to its stream-based architecture, helping teams manage complex codebases seamlessly. It supports parallel development, facilitating the streamlined management of simultaneous projects. Its scalability ensures seamless adaptation to changing team sizes and project demands.

What are the key features of OpenText AccuRev?

Stream-based architecture: Enables efficient management of branching and merging.
Parallel development: Supports multiple code paths for concurrent project work.
Scalability: Adapts to team size and project complexity effortlessly.
Time-based visualizations: Enhances understanding of project history and changes.
Enterprise-level security: Ensures safe and secure data handling practices.

What benefits should users evaluate in OpenText AccuRev?

Improved team collaboration: Facilitates smooth workflows among development teams.
Increased efficiency: Streamlines processes and reduces manual overhead.
Enhanced control: Offers precise management over project changes and iterations.
Cost savings: Reduces resources needed for managing complex projects.

OpenText AccuRev is implemented across industries like software development, finance, and telecommunications to manage large-scale applications. Its adaptability has made it a go-to option where change management and version control are critical for project success.

OpenText

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Akcelerant, SDL, CSG, Avid Technology Inc., Azimuth Systems Inc, Drivecam, Endgame, f5 Networks, Follett Software, Hyland Software, Indanet, Kronos, McAfee

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

June 2026

Free Report: OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,588 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText AccuRev vs. OpenText Application Quality Management report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.