We performed a comparison between JFrog Xray and Tenable Nessus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of JFrog Xray is the display of the entire internal dependencies hierarchy."
"JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code."
"Good reporting functionalities."
"I would say that this solution has helped our organization by allowing us to automate a lot of the processes."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"If multiple dependencies and vulnerabilities are found in a project, JFrog Xray is intelligent enough to tell you which vulnerability to target first."
"JFrog Xray's reporting feature has a lot of options in it, including scanning."
"The solution is very stable."
"The initial setup of Tenable Nessus is very easy."
"The most valuable feature of Tenable Nessus is the GUI and user-friendliness. Additionally, the environment is easy to work with."
"The most valuable feature of Tenable Nessus is the support it provides for any new vulnerabilities quickly."
"The solution is great for scanning servers."
"The reports are pretty nice and easy to understand."
"Overall Zoom is a good solution."
"It provides multiple recommendations towards the remedy of vulnerabilities."
"I think that the user interface should be expanded to provide customers with a better dashboard for reviewing their feedback regarding their images and the vulnerabilities that are associated with the images."
"JFrog Xray does not have a dashboard."
"Lacks deeper reporting, the ability to compare things."
"JFrog Xray's documentation and error logging could be improved."
"The speed of JFrog Xray should improve. Other solutions have better performance."
"Since we have been using the solution via APIs, there are some limitations in the APIs."
"Reporting is crucial, but it is lacking in the current tool. Every organization seeks specific data points rather than general information. Therefore, we require customized reports from the Xray tool."
"Tenable Nessus could improve the reporting by adding some dashboards. The reports are a hassle at this time. Tenable.io has more detailed reports. Having a better dashboard that can show where the vulnerabilities are and be categorized would be helpful. We then could present them to upper management for a deep overview of our network posture which they do not see."
"The reporting could be improved. The reporting in Rapid7 is much better."
"Remediation needs improvement."
"Tenable Nessus is not feasible for a large company."
"I would like to see an improvement in the ranking of high, medium and low vulnerability."
"It would be a good idea if they have a simulation of attacks or a use case for finding a new vulnerability or dealing with a zero-day attack."
"The reporting feature needs to be improved."
"We'd like to see the solution embrace more user-friendliness."
JFrog Xray is ranked 16th in Vulnerability Management with 7 reviews while Tenable Nessus is ranked 3rd in Vulnerability Management with 75 reviews. JFrog Xray is rated 8.2, while Tenable Nessus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of JFrog Xray writes "An intelligent solution that prioritizes which vulnerability to target first in your project". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Nessus writes "Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results". JFrog Xray is most compared with Black Duck, Snyk, Mend.io, Veracode and Fortify Static Code Analyzer, whereas Tenable Nessus is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Security Center, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Pentera. See our JFrog Xray vs. Tenable Nessus report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.