JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics GP comparison

Oracle and Microsoft are both solutions in the ERP category. Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.2, while Microsoft is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. Oracle holds a 3.0% mindshare in ERP, compared to Microsoft’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Read 61 JD Edwards EnterpriseOne reviews

2,405 Views
1,954 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 24 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

846 Views
540 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics GP and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are ERP solutions competing in enterprise resource planning. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne exhibits strong integration features, while Microsoft Dynamics GP is preferred for its smoother adaptation, giving it an advantage in customization.

Features: Microsoft Dynamics GP is strong in financial management, human resources, payables management, and workflow automation. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers advanced analytics, tailored industry solutions, and robust integration across business processes, supporting larger enterprises with complex demands.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics GP could enhance scalability and expand industry-specific solutions to compete better with larger ERP systems. It also needs more comprehensive customer service for broader geographic regions. JD Edwards might improve by simplifying its initial setup and offering lower deployment costs. Enhancements in user-friendly interfaces can also benefit its adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne supports hybrid deployment models like on-premises and cloud, offering stellar customer service. Microsoft Dynamics GP, generally localized, allows quicker initial deployments due to simplicity but provides less global customer service coverage compared to JD Edwards.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics GP often provides a lower initial setup cost, attractive to businesses with budget limits. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, while having higher upfront costs, potentially delivers higher ROI via functionality and scalability. The choice is influenced by immediate versus long-term company budget strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Ranking in ERP

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Activity Based Costing Software (5th), Production Planning (3rd), Demand Management (2nd)

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 3.0%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP

Featured Reviews

Eric Oboh

Director at Vertex Business Systems

Enables efficient finance and maintenance management with real-time data and strong integration

The integration between plant maintenance, stores, and financials is highly valued by my customers in the refinery business, as it allows for efficient maintenance processes and easily accessible financial information. Additionally, the mobile features are beneficial as they allow managers to approve or reject orders on the go. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne ( /products/jd-edwards-enterpriseone-reviews ) provides real-time data, which is very timely for decision-making. Managers have dashboards created for them that are readily updated for insightful information. This reflects the improved business intelligence features of the solution.

Read full review

Firaz Mohammed

Information Technology Manager at a retailer with 51-200 employees

Offers great integration capabilities and allows just the real-time inventory

Dynamics GP improves inventory management by offering real-time inventory tracking, and automated purchase order creation, receiving, and updating inventory levels. It facilitates site-to-site transfers and allocation tracking, enabling efficient stock management across locations. The integration capability of Dynamics GP, combined with Power Platform, has transformed our business processes. We now use PowerApps to enable salesmen to send orders electronically, eliminating the need for order books. Additionally, we developed HR apps to streamline tasks for our staff, leading to automated processes and improved efficiency. Our experience with Dynamics GP reporting and analytics features, particularly Advanced Analysis, has been great. We utilize customized smart lists for purchasing and other functions, allowing for tailored insights over specific periods. Additionally, we have developed custom dashboards for enhanced visibility and support portal integration. I wouldn't recommend Dynamics GP due to its legacy status and impending end of support. However, if integration with the Power Platform is crucial and the company prioritizes modernization, it could still be a viable option. For new companies, I would suggest considering Dynamics 365 Business Central for a more modern solution. Overall, I would rate Dynamics GP as a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."

"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows."

"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."

"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."

"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perfect for our reporting for the management, workflow, and procurement workflow."

"The solution can scale."

"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."

"There are numerous good features."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pros

"The system is easy to customize and has user-friendly access. "

"The fixed assets, payroll, the data module, and user-friendliness are most valuable."

"The solution is easy to use and not complicated. Also, it is easy to get trained on. Also, there is good information available on the web. The GP community is quite broad and there are many blogs online."

"Snowflake's ability to handle large queries efficiently is very beneficial, unlike other databases which can take a significant amount of time for similar tasks."

"You can track everything from beginning to end quite easily."

"We have gained the capability to control and address various issues within the financial module effectively."

"It is strong in integration."

"The solution offers integrations with other software as well. We have integration with Microsoft Office where we can do Word and Excel, etc."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement on the payroll side, as the solution is not very strong in this area."

"I haven't come across any downsides just yet."

"For large or sophisticated organizations, I would not recommend JD Edwards."

"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."

"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."

"If they can research and make the installation part easier or more user-friendly, it would be nice."

"The reporting has to be flexible or it will turn the end-user off."

"While it is easy to handle, there is room for improvement compared to more sophisticated ERP systems."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne cons

"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules. We use different sets of books such as CashBook and CheckBooks therefore if I select the wrong one the solution allows the transaction to just pass without warning."

"At times, navigating the user console can be challenging, particularly when trying to find account information."

"I would rate technical support for Microsoft Dynamics GP on a scale of 1 to 10 as six or five maximum."

"As for room for improvement, they have different modules, project and analytical accounting, but it will be good to have that kind of part in the standard package. To have that additional reporting functionality where you can add an attribute or something, which you can report again. So you can analyze the cost by not just natural accounts but also by a project, without having to go through another module edit on top and then the other module edit on top. The more modules you add, sometimes it doesn't work that well. Additionally, it would be easier to have the solution on the cloud. That's our consideration. We are trying to move all our systems to the cloud, and GP is one of them that we are going to move in the next couple of years. I would rate the solution seven or seven point five out of ten."

"Initially, we encountered challenges, particularly with users transitioning from their previous applications."

"As technology changes, I would say probably in the area of chart up account needs improvement because chart up account is a string. So if they make it more flexible."

"What could be improved is the functionality of Dynamics GP because it requires a lot of development by the programmers and the company in order to integrate into a solution."

"It requires a lot of expertise to implement."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The maintenance of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is expensive and overall the solution is expensive. Most enterprise operation solution is expensive."

"In terms of price, it is not on the high end."

"The licensing costs are on a yearly basis, and there are no additional costs."

"The pricing is very high. Even though the license is perpetual yet you have to get the maintenance. Since we pay using Pesos, it's very expensive."

"The price of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is high. However, every ERP solution has a high price."

"The pricing is an "arm-and-a-leg". This keeps the customers away from going for J.D. Edwards."

"More transparent pricing of the software is needed."

"The licensing is for mid-market businesses, where it is cheaper than Oracle Cloud, EBS, or SAP."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pricing and cost advice

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"The solution's price is steep."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

"It is an affordable solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perceived as expensive compared to newer applications, and consultancy costs are on the high side.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

I recommend JD Edwards EnterpriseOne due to its stability and functionality, but it may be cost-prohibitive for clients who are budget-conscious. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Dynamics GP?

The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

The version upgrading can be better. The process of moving from one version to the next can be improved. There are certain aspects that they don't support when they move to higher versions, but man...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 14% of the time

PeopleSoft vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 9% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 8% of the time

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Competitors

Odoo vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 24% of the time

Epicor ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 21% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 14% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

June 2025

Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

May 2025

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Also Known As

No data available

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

Overview

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) software solution developed by Oracle. It is designed to help organizations streamline and automate their business processes, including financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing operations. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a highly customizable solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, distribution, and services.

With JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, organizations can manage their financials, inventory, order management, procurement, and supply chain processes from a single, integrated platform. It also provides real-time visibility into business performance, enabling organizations to make informed decisions and respond quickly to changing market conditions.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Features

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Financial management: The solution provides tools for financial management, including general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, and fixed assets.

Supply chain management: Its tools for managing the supply chain include procurement, inventory management, and order management.

Manufacturing operations: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne supports manufacturing operations, including material requirements planning (MRP), capacity planning, and shop floor control.

Real-time visibility: With its real-time visibility into business performance, organizations can make more informed decisions.

Business intelligence: The solution offers business intelligence and reporting capabilities to help organizations gain insight into their operations and make data-driven decisions.

Workflow management: The solution’s workflow management enables organizations to automate and streamline business processes.

Mobile access: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne allows users to access information and perform tasks from anywhere, at any time via mobile access.

Security: It provides a secure platform for protecting sensitive data and ensuring the integrity of business operations.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Increased productivity: With its range of tools and features, the solution supports collaboration and communication, improving productivity and reducing the time required to complete tasks.

Improved business performance: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne helps organizations improve their overall business performance by providing real-time visibility into key performance metrics and enabling data-driven decision-making.

Customization: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers a highly customizable solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a wide range of industries and organizations.

Integration: It integrates with other enterprise applications, including customer relationship management (CRM), human resources (HR), and e-commerce solutions.

Reviews from Real Users

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are its ability to model, ease of use, customization capabilities, and being able to create reports without coding.

According to PeerSpot user Raymond R., JD Edwards functional consultant manufacturer at Ordina, “The strongest functionality of JD Edwards is the ability to model, in the production that it is, model the production process. If I were to model the bill of materials and production routing, then that's one of the strongest parts of JD Edwards.”

Khalid J., Senior Manager - Group ICT at Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill Co. B. S. C., says, "We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."

In addition, a Project Leader at a tech services company expresses, "With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."

Oracle

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a complete enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution for small and medium-sized businesses. Dynamics GP helps you gain greater control over your financials, inventory, and operations. It’s easy to implement and use and empowers informed decisions that lead to business success.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

June 2025

Free Report: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Find out what your peers are saying about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.