Ixia Hawkeye vs ScienceLogic comparison

Keysight Technologies and ScienceLogic are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #63, while ScienceLogic is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.5% mindshare in IM, compared to ScienceLogic’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ScienceLogic users who would recommend it.

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

1,047 Views
544 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

4,294 Views
2,233 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

ScienceLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ScienceLogic and Ixia Hawkeye compete in network monitoring and IT infrastructure management. Ixia Hawkeye appears to have the upper hand in feature richness, offering comprehensive capabilities that justify its price, while users prefer ScienceLogic's pricing and support.

Features: ScienceLogic offers real-time monitoring, automated incident management, robust integrations, and customizable dashboards. Ixia Hawkeye provides detailed traffic insights, advanced analytics, and focuses on network performance and application monitoring. Its in-depth visibility features stand out from ScienceLogic.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve its feature set further to match the depth provided by Ixia, enhance in-depth traffic analysis, and widen its application monitoring capabilities. Ixia Hawkeye can work on simplifying its deployment process, adjust its pricing for more budget-conscious organizations, and enhance its user interface for better usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides a straightforward deployment process emphasizing automation, along with strong support services. Ixia Hawkeye requires a slightly more complex deployment but compensates with reliable customer service and extensive training resources.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is known for its competitive pricing and swift ROI, making it cost-effective for budget-minded businesses. Ixia Hawkeye, with a higher initial setup cost, delivers substantial value through advanced features, promising a longer-term ROI for those needing in-depth analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Ixia Hawkeye vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. ScienceLogic

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,672 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in Unified Communications Monitoring

6th

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

83rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

63rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Unified Communications Monitoring

1st

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

16th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Server Monitoring (10th), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th), AIOps (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.6%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ScienceLogic	1.6%
Ixia Hawkeye	0.5%
Other	97.9%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."

"ScienceLogic's custom enablement, which I can achieve as a Python developer, is unique."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."

"The integration of ScienceLogic with our existing IT ecosystems has significantly benefited our organization, as all alerts now directly go to IBM Netcool and then to the ITSM tool, ServiceNow."

"I recommend ScienceLogic to other users."

"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."

"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"They need a little more self-service."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

See all answers

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 17% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 13% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 12% of the time

Aurea CX Monitor vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 12% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

December 2025

Download ScienceLogic product report

Overview

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.

Keysight Technologies

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic

Sample Customers

EMA

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. ScienceLogic

December 2025

Free Report: Ixia Hawkeye vs. ScienceLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia Hawkeye vs. ScienceLogic and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ixia Hawkeye vs. ScienceLogic report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, best Unified Communications Monitoring vendors, and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.