Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager vs Qualys Patch Management comparison

Ivanti and Qualys are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Ivanti is ranked #30, while Qualys is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9. Ivanti holds a 1.1% mindshare in PM, compared to Qualys’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Patch for Configurat...

Read 2 Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager reviews

349 Views
349 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys Patch Management

Read 33 Qualys Patch Management reviews

1,166 Views
1,166 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Ivanti Patch for Configurat...

Qualys Patch Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager and Qualys Patch Management are leading patch management solutions with distinct capabilities and user feedback. Ivanti seems to have the upper hand in ease of integration and cost-effectiveness, while Qualys leads in advanced security features and cloud flexibility.

Features: Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager offers seamless integration with Microsoft SCCM, extensive third-party app patching, and automation capabilities. Qualys Patch Management provides comprehensive vulnerability assessments, cloud-native patching, and real-time updates.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti users seek a more intuitive reporting system, better documentation, and enhancements in user experience. Qualys users want improvements in patch deployment speed, a more straightforward setup process, and enhancements in technical performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager is praised for its straightforward deployment model and reliable customer support. Qualys Patch Management receives positive feedback for its scalability in cloud deployment but has a more complex initial setup. Qualys customer service is noted for responsiveness and expertise.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager is considered cost-effective with a good ROI due to its integration with Microsoft SCCM. Qualys Patch Management may come at a higher price, justified by its advanced security features and comprehensive patch management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Patch for Configurat...

Ranking in Patch Management

30th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qualys Patch Management

Ranking in Patch Management

4th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys Patch Management is 4.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Chandola

Senior Associate Specialist at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Provides detection logic that tells us which customer will record an update and is less expensive than other solutions

I haven't had experience with customer service and support, however, we did have an advisory case with one of their technical support staff. We were publishing and getting the full metadata for the patch. We were getting the full updates for the patch release. There was confusion as to why we were seeing that in the SCCM, instead of in the full metadata patch. The support person was able to help us in understanding what we were doing wrong, highlighting it could be a certificate issue. We generated a new certificate, and after they were applied, the issue was fixed. Overall, I would rate their customer service and support a five out of five.

Read full review

Revathi VeeraRaghavan

Information Security - Manager at Infosys

Provides a centralized platform for managing assets and vulnerabilities, enabling assessment, prioritization, and remediation

Qualys Patch Management system requires several improvements. Firstly, the inability to download asset patches and the lack of third-party application integration limit patch accessibility. Additionally, rollback options are unreliable, and pre-deployment patch testing is crucial. Reporting needs enhancement, particularly with group-based compliance percentages and clearer, VMDR-like reporting in the Patch Management module. Furthermore, detection speed should be improved, as patches are released 24 hours after QIDs are published. The user interface could be more functional, with dashboards for patch compliance visualization and simplified error code language. Finally, the Mac patch catalogue needs expansion, and automated workflows, policy enforcement, and testing procedures should be streamlined for seamless, user-independent operation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature of Ivanti Patch for SCCM is the detection logic."

"Qualys Patch Management offers numerous valuable features, including automatic patching for Google browsers, which allows for scheduled updates immediately upon vendor release."

"Overall, I would rate Qualys Patch Management a ten out of ten for everything."

"The integration of Qualys Gateway Scanner is my favorite feature."

"Qualys Patch Management offers a valuable feature that allows for deferred reboots, giving users control while still ensuring eventual patching."

"Automated features streamline patch deployment and ensure compliance, effectively mitigating risks and bolstering organizational security."

"Qualys Patch Management has reduced our organization's risk by almost 90 percent."

"The most valuable features are the ease of managing both first-party and third-party patching, the generation of dashboards, and the provision of real-time information."

"Qualys Patch Management allows us to structure all the patches together and schedule patch management sessions."

More Qualys Patch Management pros

Cons

"In future releases, I would like to see improvements with the feature upgrade for the SCCM, which Microsoft has already integrated. Currently, Ivanti does not give us information about the enablement package."

"We have some problems with patches not installing successfully."

"False positives were the biggest concern."

"It is pretty good. However, it would be good to have more widgets and AI-generated reports. I have not seen anything related to AI with Qualys. It would be beneficial for Qualys to incorporate AI-generated tools for Patch Management and VMDR. This could assist in managing risks, providing AI-generated reports, and creating risk letters for clients, which can streamline communication."

"Qualys could improve its randomized download feature and provide more detailed information about patch failures, including the reason for failure."

"Qualys could improve its capacity to fix vulnerabilities on VMware and other virtualized environments. The reporting could also be enhanced to make it more user-friendly. It's difficult for beginners to learn."

"We dislike having to pay extra. We don't mind paying for additional modules like Certificate View."

"However, it would be good to have more widgets and AI-generated reports. I have not seen anything related to AI with Qualys."

"They should focus on increasing the list of supported patches. New software or data is continuously released, and it would be beneficial if patches were updated in the knowledge base more quickly."

"One area for improvement in Qualys Patch Management is knowing whether patches have been completely downloaded in a particular QGS appliance."

More Qualys Patch Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We do not have a license with Ivanti, instead we buy just the plugins for the consoles, making it a much less expensive option versus other solutions."

"From what I have heard, Qualys Patch Management is pricey, which is a main barrier to entry. Another aspect that I do not like about Qualys is that they do not add new patch management functionalities to the existing package. It is a separate SKU, so you have to pay more money."

"The pricing is reasonable and competitive. We get many more features at the same price compared to other solutions such as Microsoft SCCM. It is worth the money considering the services and features it has. Their support team is also awesome."

"Pricing for Qualys Patch Management is moderate."

"Its price is competitive in the market. Compared to other solutions like Rapid7, Qualys offers a favorable price point and robust features."

"Qualys Patch Management is expensive."

"While the cost of Qualys Patch Management is slightly high compared to alternative tools, it is not excessively expensive."

"It is affordable, but they should provide features as per the rate they are charging. We have a big infrastructure with about 80,000 licenses. We expect better support from the Qualys team. So, it is affordable, but more features should be there, and the support should be better."

"Qualys Patch Management is a cost-effective solution for managing our 43,000-plus assets."

More Qualys Patch Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?

From a pricing perspective, I find Qualys to be a bit higher, but it is worth it. Compared to other tools, it is on the costly side, but I believe it is worth the investment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?

Regarding improvements in Qualys Patch Management, I did not quite understand the downsides they were expecting. Initially, I was confused about where to find and how to use the available features....

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?

I am using Qualys Patch Management for two years, and everything is satisfactory from my side. Before purchasing Qualys Patch Management, we were already using Qualys VMDR and the cloud agent model...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager

Compared 58% of the time

BigFix vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager

Compared 42% of the time

More Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager Competitors

BigFix vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 13% of the time

Patch My PC vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 13% of the time

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 11% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Qualys Patch Management

Compared 10% of the time

More Qualys Patch Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

August 2025

Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager report

Download Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys Patch Management

August 2025

Download Qualys Patch Management product report

Also Known As

Patch for SCCM, Shavlik Patch for SCCM, Ivanti Patch for MEM

No data available

Overview

Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager is an invaluable plug-in for Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (MEM) that streamlines patch management by allowing you to publish and manage third-party software patches alongside Microsoft updates, all within a unified workflow. This means you can save both time and effort by eliminating the need for separate tools to manage your patching process. With comprehensive patch coverage for various third-party products, automated deployment, flexible scheduling, real-time reporting, and seamless integration with Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, Ivanti Patch simplifies and enhances your patch management.

Ivanti

Qualys Patch Management optimizes patching and vulnerability remediation through automation and intelligence insights, accelerating the process by 43% and improving patch rates by 90%. Its integration with CMDB and ITSM tools speeds up ticket closures by 60%, effectively reducing the attack surface while freeing IT and security resources. This cloud-based solution bridges the IT-security gap, making it essential for cybersecurity.

Qualys

Sample Customers

University of Pittsburgh

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management

July 2025

Free Report: Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.