Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL] vs Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Ivanti and Matrix42 are both solutions in the Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) category. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Matrix42 users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager and Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management compete in the endpoint management solutions category. Matrix42 seems to have the upper hand in advanced features and overall satisfaction, with Ivanti focusing on competitive pricing and support.

Features: Ivanti Endpoint Security provides robust antivirus, device control, and vulnerability management, making it appealing for those prioritizing traditional security. Matrix42 offers a comprehensive suite supporting a broad range of devices, integrating seamlessly with cloud services. Its wider device management capabilities differentiate it strongly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti offers a straightforward deployment process, known for effective support services, appealing to those requiring quick implementations. Matrix42’s deployment is more versatile but requires additional configuration, offering adaptability for complex environments. Ivanti’s rapid setup contrasts with Matrix42’s flexibility for diverse needs.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti is cost-effective, with lower setup costs and quicker ROI in straightforward environments. Matrix42 requires a higher initial investment, justified by long-term benefits due to its extensive features and integrations. Ivanti’s affordability and quicker ROI contrast with Matrix42's higher upfront cost, balanced by greater long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Featured Reviews

Anumula Hitesh

Senior Business Development Executive at Digitaltrack

Centralized device management has automated onboarding and improves remote security compliance

One thing I feel Microsoft Intune could improve is troubleshooting visibility. In many cases, when a policy or application deployment fails, the error messages are a bit generic. So, admins still spend time checking logs manually or testing on devices one by one. Compared to the simplicity of deployment, troubleshooting sometimes feels less mature. I also think reporting and real-time monitoring could be stronger. The dashboard gives useful information, but in large environments, many teams still depend on additional tools or scripts for deeper reporting and analytics. If I had to focus on one area first, I would probably choose troubleshooting and reporting. Deployment through Microsoft Intune is generally straightforward, but when something fails, identifying the exact root cause can still take more time than expected. Error messages are sometimes too generic, and admins often have to dig through logs, sync status, or multiple portals to understand what actually happened. I think user experience and policy management could also improve further. Microsoft Intune has become much better over the years, but sometimes the admin portal still feels fragmented because certain configurations open in different sections or redirect to older interfaces. For new admins, especially, it can take time to understand where everything is located. Another thing is policy conflict handling. In larger organizations, multiple device policies, compliance rules, and configuration profiles can overlap. When conflicts happen, the visibility is not always very clear, so admins spend time figuring out which policy actually won or caused the issue.

Read full review

Sanjay Mukhopadhyay

Director - Sales & Operations - India at Intertec Systems

A solid low-code builder that helps build workflows and processes in a variety of settings

It's not complex, but you need certified skills for setup to be easy. It is different for an L1 resource, who has a basic understanding of things and may not be a developer who deeply understands how to build up the solution, where that understanding is present with an L3 or L2 resource. For maintenance, you need at least one skill set for each module. You would need one for UEM and one more for MDM, which is the ideal way to do it unless you have people who know the modules in and out. We have a larger team for IT service management because the demand for IT service management is high, but we can see that for other modules as well now.

Read full review

Sanjay Mukhopadhyay

Director - Sales & Operations - India at Intertec Systems

It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support

Matrix42 is a complete solution in terms of functionality. Still, you need to understand whether it's also capable of managing Kubernetes containers to that extent, and this is not very clear in the product fact sheet. It’s possible with Ivanti MobileIron, though, and Matrix42 seems to be one step behind in this aspect. Likewise, in terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42 to integrate with more third-party tools compared to Ivanti, which has a larger number of integrations due to its size. MobileIron is an older product that has evolved over time, offering advantages in terms of readily available third-party APIs and integrations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Intune is valuable for managing various endpoints and integrating with the Azure cloud, which is essential for our organization."

"Overall, the stability is good."

"It is a stable solution."

"I can see that the patch management process is much improved with the bundled patch management option available in Microsoft Intune compared to the KPI deployment required by the other deployment solutions."

"While Microsoft Intune boasts a wide range of features, its user-friendliness and bundled licensing cost are key considerations for me."

"I would say that Microsoft Intune is absolutely the right choice for any organization that is already invested in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem and wants a unified cloud-native endpoint management approach."

"The biggest asset is the range of device management options available with Intune, whether it is a Windows device, a Linux device, a Mac device, or mobile devices."

"The navigation, the keys, and the settings are easy to find. It is easy to understand."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is cloud-based, which aids in deployment."

"The best part about Ivanti and Matrix 42 is that they are low-code solution builders with drag-and-drop capabilities regarding service management."

"The most valuable feature of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager, which my company mainly uses, is patching. Another valuable feature of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is that it allows you to view the inventory list of the different machines."

"The product has good stability."

"It provides security features for unified endpoint management."

"The solution's most valuable features are its patch management functionality and provisioning."

"Ivanti is really good. They have a very good vulnerability database in which even if it is used for other products like BMC or Microsoft, the vulnerabilities and patching database is well filtered and very well documented."

"The key differentiator is that it manages mobile devices and laptops in the same console. Windows and Linux are on the same console. This is the only product that does this. It's really the best in the industry."

More Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL] pros

"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."

Cons

"Some enrollment features could be improved."

"My main pain point for Microsoft Intune is the contact part. Not all Android or iOS applications have access to integration, for example, contacts."

"Enrollment into the Microsoft Intune service can still get easier, especially for legacy-managed systems, such as how we get it from a GPO or an SCCM configuration into Intune."

"When Microsoft Intune is used with different android devices it does not always work as it is supposed to."

"It isn't easy to use. It's very complicated, but as long as you take the time to learn it, you can do just about anything you want with your device."

"Microsoft Intune could be faster with client to server communication. Whenever I push something, it takes time; sometimes it takes more than one hour to deploy on the Windows side."

"The feature that allows us to import the business application from the configuration manager to Intune is not very good at this time."

"I also hope the cost of Remote Help will decrease because it's a much-needed Intune function."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"One of the features that Ivanti could improve is patching for non-Windows settings, such as Linux and Ubuntu."

"Some of the GUI features need improvement. In particular, navigation could be better optimized for quick navigation by the user."

"If I want to integrate the solution with any other solution, pushing the policies from the Ivanti side is a bit tough."

"The solution needs a complete overhaul or makeover. It gets stuck sometimes because they're focusing on the cloud UEM stuff rather than paying as much attention to that particular piece. The ease of use could be improved. It combines many different functionalities that you would need multiple servers like SCCM. If I wanted to train people, I’d move to a higher level from an Apache architect. There are five or six different products. So, training functional staff to use the product can be challenging because it can sometimes be cumbersome. Reporting is challenging. We use Avanti extraction to report off an endpoint. We don't use the reporting because of the need for more functionality, granularity, or customization."

"Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager's support provided to its users by the vendor is one area that needs to improve."

"The product's blocking definition needs improvement."

"An area for improvement in Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is reporting. It's lacking. For example, Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager reports should tell you if the agent is up to date, if the security patch is updated, etc."

"It could benefit from faster integration with new technologies, such as quicker adaptation to Windows updates. Additionally, more advanced customization options would be valuable."

More Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL] cons

"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."

"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive. The cost depends on the license that we choose."

"I rate Intune five out of 10 for pricing. It's expensive."

"While I can't provide insights from a business perspective, it's worth noting that the pricing may differ significantly, and the discount we received might not be reflective of standard business rates."

"Most of our clients come to us with licensing already in place. On average, it costs $6 per device per month to add Intune to an Office 365 subscription, but I am not sure."

"Any bundle package, such as Security E3, covers multiple things, such as AAP, BitLocker, etc. If you go for them individually, they would be more expensive. Bundling makes the price more attractive and competitive."

"It is cheap, but as compared to Google, it is costly. Google is cheaper, but quality-wise, Microsoft Intune is better."

"Microsoft Intune is not cost-effective as a standalone product."

"Its pricing seems reasonable."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing ten out of ten."

"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest, and one is the cheapest, I rate its pricing a five."

"The product is expensive."

"The licensing is based on assets for MDM or EM, where you need one license per asset. The license is annual, and it is not very expensive."

"The solution is pretty expensive."

"The pricing is relatively high compared to some competitors."

"Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is more expensive than some of the products I've used. It follows module-based licensing, so it would be more costly if you had more modules. Your costs depend on what modules you need."

"Matrix42 is more affordable than Ivanti."

"I am not sure the price of this solution but I would imagine it is fairly expensive because of the complexity, you would not use it in a small company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	192
Midsize Enterprise	62
Large Enterprise	187

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

Some of the GUI features need improvement. In particular, navigation could be better optimized for quick navigation b...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

I use Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager ( /products/ivanti-endpoint-security-for-endpoint-manager-reviews...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

I rate the solution eight out of ten overall. Among the AI features, it's used for discovery and remediation. The nav...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 12% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 9% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

BigFix vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Tanium vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Competitors

Workspace ONE UEM vs Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management

Compared 19% of the time

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management vs Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management

Compared 17% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management

Compared 9% of the time

Sophos Mobile vs Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management

Compared 7% of the time

NinjaOne vs Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

August 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL]

September 2026

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL] report

Download Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

September 2026

Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management report

Download Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

LANDesk Security Suite, Ivanti Endpoint Security

Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM), Silverback Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager combines a powerful vulnerability database with cloud-based deployment, facilitating mobile and OS management while enhancing security.

The platform features efficient patch management, remote control, and data access via mobile devices. Its unified console supports asset tracking across Windows, Mac, and Android, improving security patching processes. With inventory management, low-code workflow builders, built-in compliance, and an appealing UI, it manages thousands of devices, though it requires improvements in mobile onboarding, agent troubleshooting, and non-Windows patching. Some challenges exist with policy integration and IT tool integration, while comprehensive training is essential due to its wide range of functionalities.

What are the key features of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

Unified Console: Streamlines management of mobile devices and operating systems.
Cloud-Based Deployment: Simplifies setup and reduces overhead.
Vulnerability Database: Enhances identification and patching of security risks.
Remote Control: Facilitates device management and data access remotely.
Low-Code Workflow Builders: Allows easy customization without extensive coding.

Which benefits should users expect when evaluating Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

Improved Security Compliance: Ensures alignment with security best practices.
Operational Efficiency: Automates patch deployment and asset tracking.
User Satisfaction: Gains from an intuitive and visually appealing interface.
Multi-OS Support: Manages Windows, Mac, and Android devices effectively.

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is implemented across industries for enhanced security patching, mobile device management, and data compliance. Companies utilize its features for managing personal and corporate data separately to prevent data leaks and breaches. The system enables efficient management of device fleets, though Mac management has noted limitations.

Ivanti

Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is a comprehensive solution designed to streamline management across devices and platforms. It enhances productivity by providing a centralized approach to managing endpoints, offering efficient, secure collaboration within enterprises.

Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management addresses the complexities of managing diverse devices. By unifying administration tasks, it allows IT departments to deploy, secure, and support a wide range of endpoints. The integration capabilities with existing systems ensure seamless operation, reducing downtime and improving operational efficiency. The platform offers robust features that aid in compliance and security, making it indispensable for enterprises striving for excellence in endpoint management.

What are the most notable features?

Comprehensive Device Management: Supports various devices including smartphones, tablets, and laptops, ensuring smooth operation.
Integrated Security Controls: Provides multilayer protection to prevent breaches and data loss.
Customizable Reporting: Allows tailored insights and analytics for strategic planning.
Automated Workflow Processes: Streamlines routine tasks for enhanced productivity.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces manual intervention through automation, saving time.
Cost Effectiveness: Lowers operational costs by simplifying endpoint management.
Improved Compliance: Eases adherence to regulatory requirements with detailed monitoring.
Increased Security: Minimizes risks with proactive protection features.

Industries like healthcare and finance, which require stringent data security and regulatory compliance, find Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management invaluable. It supports sector-specific needs through secure data handling and efficient management of a large volume of endpoints, ultimately driving business success in these fields.

Matrix42

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Otkritie Bank, France T_l_visions, MBDA, 21st Century Oncology, Sealed Air Corporation, Granite School District, The Bunker, The MAC Services Group, Adams 12 Five Star Schools District, AlliedBarton Security Services, Mohawk Industries, Sun National Bank

Partou Childcare

Buyer's Guide

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ManageEngine, IBM and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM). Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.

We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.