Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management vs Scalefusion comparison

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management vs. Scalefusion

Download the complete report

Helped 908,344 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

Domenico Pochiero

Senior Product Leader, Sqs at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Automated onboarding has saved hundreds of hours and now standardizes device security globally

In terms of how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, I think there's potential for automation of some repetitive tasks. The device provisioning process has already become very close to zero-touch, but the patch deployment is still scheduled and policy-driven. As a result, I believe we can reduce endpoint administration further. I also think the number of integrations and the scalability of the tool can be improved, along with customer service, as we've encountered some issues in certain countries. Regarding the needed improvements, particularly concerning integrations or customer service challenges, we have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing. Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates. The accuracy and reliability of output from Ivanti's AI can be improved. We notice that the AI-driven insights are useful, but there are anomalies and some false positives. Since we are still in a validation period, I cannot provide a definitive mark, but I believe that accuracy should be enhanced, especially for more complex and environment-specific issues where human intervention is still needed.

Read full review

Jijin Joseph

Technical Director at Channelnext

An MDM solution for controlling and restricting data on devices

Everyone is using high-end devices, such as mobile devices. If they lose their devices, how about the data copied to other devices? Once the device is lost, you can remotely delete all of the data and block the device, preventing anyone from using or reusing it. This will keep your devices secure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can control applications, and I can secure applications by using the MAM policy, which is very effective and very helpful in protecting our users' data on mobile devices such as iPhones and Android phones."

"Intune's most valuable features are the device, compliance, and configuration policies."

"Cloud-based device management is the best feature for me as it impacts my company the most; it is much easier than the previous Configuration Manager or SCCM."

"I like the group policy management feature, which performs application monitoring and device enrollment."

"We were trying to solve many issues, mainly the lack of centralized management. Before Microsoft Intune, we had to manually support devices one by one, installing applications and configuring policies individually. When we implemented the tool, it became much easier to manage our devices. We enroll them in Microsoft Intune and can manage all devices with a few clicks. For application management, it's the same process. If we want to deploy applications to hundreds or thousands of devices, we can do it easily with just a few clicks. This also applies to policies."

"Microsoft Intune is a good solution and it is purely based on Azure cloud, so I can use all the benefits of Azure cloud in Microsoft Intune and several good features in Microsoft Intune to manage devices."

"I can see that the patch management process is much improved with the bundled patch management option available in Microsoft Intune compared to the KPI deployment required by the other deployment solutions."

"The mobile device management is very useful."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"The security features in Ivanti Neurons for MDM are very effective, which is why we have been distributing it for the past 15 years."

"Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution."

"We manage over 1,000 new devices per year, saving more than 1,500 hours of manual IT work annually."

"Ivanti's unified platform for IT and security operations helps streamline processes, especially because the manual intervention of having to constantly monitor, update, and maintain endpoints and applications has significantly reduced by leveraging Ivanti Neurons for UEM."

"The best features Ivanti Neurons for UEM offers include automation capabilities that help reduce manual work and improve efficiency."

"I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature."

"The company provides great customer service."

"Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management pros

"Scalefusion has significantly increased the amount of work we can perform and has made it much easier to achieve our goals efficiently by eliminating tedious work and cumbersome processes."

"Scalefusion is easy to use, and they have a broad knowledge base, so you can quickly find answers if you're unsure how to do something. The articles on the knowledge base are well-written, with clear steps on what to do for a specific scenario. That part is well documented."

"Its enhanced support for iOS and Windows devices has been particularly beneficial, expanding our service offerings to customers with diverse device environments."

Cons

"Microsoft Intune can be improved with a more intuitive admin interface, faster policy synchronization, better troubleshooting and reporting capabilities, especially for complex and hybrid environments, along with more granular control and simplified management for advanced configurations."

"No option to do end-to-en macOS management. Slow implementation of policies."

"The support is not particularly good. Sometimes when you open a case with Microsoft, you end up resolving the issue by yourself."

"I would like to see the ability to deploy custom packages as a Windows 64-bit package, as opposed to the Windows 32-bit, which is the only one available now."

"It would be great if Intune offered better data protection controls for BYOD Windows PCs."

"The most important thing is reporting. They should improve their reporting. They should give a free hand to users. In SCCM, I can create my own reports. For example, in SCCM, I can create an inventory report for my PC or for all PCs, but in Intune, we don't have an option to create any report. Microsoft claims that Intune is a successor of SCCM, but SCCM is more powerful than Intune. So, they should develop Intune more and make it equivalent to SCCM. Then, their product will be great in the market."

"The main disadvantage seen today is regarding Linux clients. We have a lot of development resources that have Linux on their clients, and we can't manage them on the same platform, as we do with other clients such as macOS and Windows. So, it should have support for Linux clients. It should also have better support for macOS."

"Microsoft Intune could improve its reporting and troubleshooting tools since diagnosing policy sync and deployment issues can still feel a bit complicated at times."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"Regarding how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, the dashboard can be quite complex for first-time users and even small-scale organizations."

"In terms of improvements for Ivanti Neurons for UEM, the only challenge I face with EPM Endpoint Manager is in scanning network devices, as some devices appear without a serial number, which is an issue that takes more time since customers often require the serial number as a mandatory field."

"Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions."

"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."

"The price being quite high and the limited container storage are areas that have room for improvement."

"The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide."

"The disadvantage in connection with Windows devices is that the pushing of policies takes some time."

"The integration between the MobileIron and Advanced Neurons isn't completely in sync, and we're still working on that."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management cons

"One area for improvement could be streamlining permissions during initial device setup, especially for corporate-owned devices, to reduce manual user interaction and expedite deployment."

"It could be easier to put devices on the blocklist. I would like the ability to block a device with a click of a button. Currently, we have to sift through different groups to block a device. It would be nice if Scalefusion allowed me to block without moving the device to a different profile. Another helpful feature they could add is the ability to migrate from one MDM to another. I'd also appreciate more extensive cloud storage. They give you 1 GB by default, but sometimes that's not enough."

"It could be easier to put devices on the blocklist. I would like the ability to block a device with a click of a button."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Intune is included with the license for Office 365, so we don't have to pay anything extra for it."

"Its price is in the medium range. It is acceptable because you're paying for the features. I am not aware of any additional costs."

"Even if they charge a premium, they aim to provide equal value."

"It is cheap, but as compared to Google, it is costly. Google is cheaper, but quality-wise, Microsoft Intune is better."

"I have no comment on pricing of the solution."

"The price is reasonable, but they should lower it a bit to make it more competitive. It's cheaper than AirWatch and other products, but I still feel like Microsoft can make a base version or with Exchange online or a la carte only Intune version which will be useful. A customer who doesn't want to go full-fledged E3 or E5 can take out or consume an Intune solution only for their purpose, and we want to target that customer."

"Generally, we get favorable discounts, so it's not too bad. Obviously, we're looking at decreasing those wherever we can to bring value back to the public purse because it's all charity based. It's all publicly funded."

"Microsoft Intune costs about $7 per user per month, which is somewhat on the pricier end. That said, it's a reliable product, so it's fair."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

"The solution is affordable."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."

"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Device Management (MDM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,344 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

No data available

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	192
Midsize Enterprise	62
Large Enterprise	186

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

Regarding pricing, I would say Ivanti Neurons for UEM falls at a nine out of ten.

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

The price being quite high and the limited container storage are areas that have room for improvement.

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

I use Ivanti Neurons for UEM for mobile device management, and I can describe the use case. The remote device managem...

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Compared 11% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 1% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

ProcessUnity vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 4% of the time

Software Risk Manager ASPM vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management Competitors

SOTI MobiControl vs Scalefusion

Compared 6% of the time

NinjaOne vs Scalefusion

Compared 6% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Scalefusion

Compared 6% of the time

42Gears SureMDM vs Scalefusion

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) vs Scalefusion

Compared 4% of the time

More Scalefusion Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Intune

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

Download Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management product report

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management report

Mobile Device Management (MDM)

Download Scalefusion product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Microsoft

Ivanti

Demo not available

Scalefusion

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leverages AI-powered automation for comprehensive endpoint control. It offers centralized management, real-time visibility, efficient patch deployment, and supports diverse operating systems.

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management integrates AI-driven automation, providing a unified dashboard for streamlined IT operations. Its features include efficient patch management and real-time device monitoring, enhancing IT security and compliance. While comprehensive, improvements in dashboard simplicity, third-party integration, and AI feature clarity are desired. It serves multiple operating systems for seamless operation across various devices, and while effective, enhancements in UI navigation and reporting are suggested. Companies find it vital for centralized device management, compliance enforcement, and automated IT task handling.

What are the most important features?

AI-powered Automation: Reduces manual work through intelligent automation.
Centralized Management: Unified control of devices from a single interface.
Real-time Visibility: Instant access to device status and operations.
Efficient Patch Management: Prioritizes and automates patch deployments.
Neurons Bots: Automates complex IT processes, enhancing efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Time Savings: Automation reduces manual task duration significantly.
Improved Compliance: Ensures security protocol adherence with ease.
Streamlined Operations: Centralized management simplifies IT workflows.
Enhanced Security: Effective patch management reduces vulnerability risks.
Device Health Monitoring: Supports continuous oversight of device status.

In industries like finance, education, and healthcare, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is deployed for managing diverse device environments. It's used for securing sensitive data, ensuring compliance in regulated industries, and optimizing IT service desk operations. Its capabilities aid in provisioning devices and maintaining an up-to-date inventory, crucial for sectors with stringent security requirements.

Ivanti

Scalefusion offers an efficient solution for mobile device management, providing robust features tailored to the needs of businesses looking to manage, control, and secure their devices effectively.

Scalefusion supports a wide range of devices and operating systems, enabling businesses to implement a security-first approach while streamlining IT operations. It's designed to simplify management tasks, allowing admins to focus on strategic initiatives rather than everyday device management challenges. Scalefusion is noted for its flexibility, offering capabilities that enhance productivity across different sectors.

What are the key features of Scalefusion?

Kiosk Mode: Enables lockdown of devices to single or multiple applications, ensuring secure and focused use.
Application Management: Facilitates the deployment and update of apps across devices from a unified platform.
Content Management: Provides streamlined distribution and management of corporate files and documents.
Remote Support: Allows IT teams to troubleshoot devices in real-time, minimizing downtime.
Compliance Control: Ensures devices meet company security policies and regulations.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Provides robust measures to protect sensitive data against unauthorized access.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces time and resources spent on device management, allowing focus on business growth.
Cost Savings: Minimizes operational costs by improving resource allocation and reducing device downtime.
Scalability: Adapts to the scaling needs of businesses without compromise in management quality.
User Satisfaction: Streamlines device usage fostering higher employee satisfaction and productivity.

Scalefusion has been effectively implemented across specific industries, such as logistics, retail, and healthcare. In logistics, it assists in tracking and managing field devices to ensure efficient operations. In retail, it supports secure transactions and customer interactions through kiosk implementations. The healthcare sector benefits from its robust compliance control, ensuring that sensitive patient data remains secure.

Scalefusion

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Frontier Airlines

Magna, Scania, Darya - Varia, Radisson Blu, Slice, Veezu

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management vs. Scalefusion