ITRS Geneos vs Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) comparison

ITRS and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. ITRS is ranked #35 with an average rating of 6.5, while Splunk is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. ITRS holds a 1.3% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

3,448 Views
1,968 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Int...

Read 50 Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) reviews

1,739 Views
1,055 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Int...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

ITRS Geneos and Splunk ITSI compete in the IT monitoring and management solutions category. Splunk ITSI seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features.

Features: ITRS Geneos offers real-time monitoring, effective alerting, and intuitive dashboards. Splunk ITSI provides deep insights into IT operations, predictive analytics, and machine learning integration.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos requires better integration with third-party tools, enhanced data visualization capabilities, and improved scalability. Splunk ITSI needs simplification in its configuration, reduced time for developing custom modules, and better performance efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos is known for its straightforward deployment model and responsive customer service. Splunk ITSI has a more complex deployment process but offers superior support with detailed guidance and training.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos is cost-effective with rapid ROI. Splunk ITSI has a higher setup cost, but its extensive capabilities justify strong ROI with significant operational efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

35th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (63rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (42nd)

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Int...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Alerting and Incident Management (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Sunil K R

Senior Software Engineer at Wipro Limited

Helps improve our incident response time, and our mean time to resolve, but visibility is limited

In my previous project, I successfully led the end-to-end deployment of a Splunk migration. The process went smoothly thanks in part to Splunk's professional services team. They conducted a thorough assessment, identified all our potential pain points, and developed a tailored solution and migration plan. This comprehensive approach ensured a seamless transition. Our core deployment team consisted of 5 internal members and two specialists from Splunk. Additionally, the project included a project manager and a product owner. We also benefited from the expertise of two professional service consultants and two representatives from the customer's side. An on-site admin architect further provided valuable technical support. Throughout the deployment process, we leveraged support from various resources whenever necessary. This included assistance with configuration changes, deployments, and other related tasks. We also collaborated effectively with our teammates to ensure a smooth and successful implementation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a very powerful application monitoring tool across the industry. Many free, open-source tools are available. There are also paid tools, but ITRS Geneos is a real-time application monitoring tool where the user can monitor, self-configure, and manage alerts through their console."

"ITRS uses SNMP to communicate with our devices as well as SNMP net probes installed on our servers."

"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."

"One thing we're utilizing in Geneos is the Gateway-SQL. That's really helpful for us. Using Gateway-SQL, we are able to merge two different views into one. Suppose we have to check something in the log and that we have to check something in the database and do a comparison before publishing a result. We can achieve that using Gateway-SQL."

"The ability to build integrations to tools that are not monitored out of the box is the most valuable feature."

"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."

"In my experience, being able to monitor our databases is a valuable feature as we can create our own queries and aren't reliant on the in-built ones."

"It's also easy to implement. The implementation of Geneos is very easy and interesting. It's not complicated. It's very quick to implement. The installation is very easy. There are many topics about ITRS Geneos that explain more about the features of the function of Geneos."

More ITRS Geneos pros

"The observability is great and valuable."

"I find the episode review, glass tables, and correlation search features very useful."

"The service analyzer view and automatic creation of incidents are valuable."

"The most valuable feature is the Glass Tables. It gives you a nice, good overview of your KPIs. It's really slick and clean."

"We have a lot of teams using Splunk and they would be blind without it."

"The solution is easy to scale."

"The most valuable feature of ITSI is the service KPIs. No other tool provides you with the same level of observability and enterprise security or the search and reporting applications."

"In my opinion, Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) is better than QRadar. With the help of Splunk, we can get results."

More Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) pros

Cons

"I would like to see ITRS integrate its setup editor with a SVN to check-in setup XML after major changes."

"For the last year or two, I've been asking the vendor about the mobile app. This is something that probably everyone asks when they see the tool and they see how powerful it is. If there is any mobile app for this or if there is any way this tool can be more easily accessible other than having a big client installed, it would be great. I know you can build dashboards, et cetera, but there is no quick and easy way. I should be able to download an app, log in, and see my status. That will put this product above everything else out there. I believe it's on their roadmap."

"I would really like to see something from the Geneos side to set up automated reporting from ITRS. We have to send reporting to management every day. To do that we have to check the dashboard and then we have to report whether everything is fine or not. In the future, I want something, some reporting kind of feature in ITRS, where it can collect all the data and mention what is green, what is amber, what is red in a report."

"Geneos' application monitoring could be improved a lot. Products like AppDynamics and Dynatrace provide the process thread-level monitoring, but Geneos lacks these capabilities."

"It needs to be easier to configure, especially with the JMX plugins."

"The deployment method for upgrading is a bit tricky. It takes a little bit of manual effort. If that could be a bit more automated, it would help us a lot."

"We all look at the same things - CPU, disk space, paging stats, service status with RAG status on each. That could be provided straight out, saving significant time."

"At the moment Geneos is excellent and handling real time monitoring, however not great at doing historical reporting."

More ITRS Geneos cons

"If the product had some prebuilt machine learning features, it would add value to our use cases."

"Quality-of-life features have room for improvement."

"We'd like them to show more inputs on the dashboard."

"The cost of the license could be lower."

"Splunk ITSI generates numerous false positives and has the potential for enhancement."

"The license cost is expensive."

"The user interface visualization could be improved."

"While Splunk has existing add-ons, they are unreliable and do not provide accurate results."

More Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

"The market tools are on par with this solution, but if the solution included more features, then it would be well within the range for the cost."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

"Splunk ITSI is a pay-per-use service that is priced fairly based on the amount of data we use."

"Splunk ITSI is expensive; however, with the appropriate use case, it justifies the cost."

"Pricing was pretty good, and it is possible to just add on the features we want."

"Splunk ITSI is expensive."

"Splunk pricing is high."

"The cost of the modules is a bit high for non-global companies, making it difficult for them to afford Splunk ITSI."

"Splunk ITSI is expensive."

"The licensing is based on data usage."

More Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

76%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ITRS Geneos?

I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What do you like most about Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)?

Our mean time to detect is down to five minutes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)?

Pricing can vary significantly based on the selected modules and deployment choices. Splunk ITSI tends to be more expensive compared to some open-source solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)?

Splunk ITSI could benefit from including more features that other solutions support, such as vulnerability management modules. This would help manage vulnerabilities effectively, allowing my organi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 23% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 16% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)

Compared 17% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)

Compared 13% of the time

OpsRamp vs Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)

Compared 9% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)

Compared 9% of the time

BigPanda vs Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)

Compared 8% of the time

More Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

May 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)

April 2025

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) report

Download Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) product report

Also Known As

Geneos

No data available

Overview

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) is a powerful analytics-driven monitoring and analytics solution that provides real-time insights into the health and performance of IT services.

It enables organizations to proactively identify and resolve issues, optimize service delivery, and improve overall IT operations. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, ITSI automatically detects anomalies, predicts future events, and prioritizes alerts based on business impact.

The solution offers a centralized view of IT services, allowing users to visualize and analyze data from multiple sources in a single dashboard. ITSI also provides customizable KPIs, service-level agreements (SLAs), and key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure and track service performance.

With its intuitive interface and powerful analytics capabilities, Splunk ITSI empowers IT teams to deliver reliable and efficient services, ensuring maximum uptime and customer satisfaction.

Splunk

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

TransUnion, Cox Automotive, Carnival Cruises, Leidos, Econocom, National Ignition Factory, Entrust Datacard, Molina Healthcare, United States Census Bureau

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)

April 2025

Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)

Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.