ITRS Geneos vs Nastel AutoPilot [EOL] comparison

ITRS and meshIQ are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. ITRS is ranked #35 with an average rating of 6.5, while meshIQ is ranked #94. ITRS holds a 1.3% mindshare in APM, compared to meshIQ’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of meshIQ users who would recommend it.

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

3,448 Views
1,968 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Nastel AutoPilot [EOL]

Read 4 Nastel AutoPilot [EOL] reviews

149 Views
69 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Nastel AutoPilot [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 12, 2025

Nastel AutoPilot [EOL] and ITRS Geneos compete in IT operations management. ITRS Geneos seems more advantageous due to its comprehensive feature set that aligns with diverse infrastructure needs.

Features: Nastel AutoPilot [EOL] focuses on real-time monitoring, automatic problem detection, and middleware monitoring. ITRS Geneos offers comprehensive infrastructure monitoring, extensive dashboards, and multi-environment alerting configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nastel AutoPilot [EOL] is straightforward to deploy with effective customer service ensuring smooth installation. ITRS Geneos, while potentially more complex to set up, benefits from robust customer service to manage deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Nastel AutoPilot [EOL] provides competitive pricing with low initial setup costs appealing to budget-conscious buyers seeking quick ROI. ITRS Geneos involves higher costs but offers enhanced functionalities with strategic long-term value for investment returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 852,764 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

35th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (63rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (42nd)

Nastel AutoPilot [EOL]

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

94th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nastel AutoPilot [EOL] is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

it_user226614

Global Head of Performance and Service Metrics at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

You can easily scale it for high message rates, but it's primarily a flow-monitoring tool rather than an APM.

Autopilot is a middleware-centric business transaction monitoring tool that includes a Complex Event Processor (CEP) for transaction data. Architecture AutoPilot Probes are lightweight performance measurement and monitoring tools for live applications that are executed at defined points within the…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

852,764 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

75%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ITRS Geneos?

I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 23% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 16% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

May 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

May 2025

Download Nastel AutoPilot [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Geneos

No data available

Overview

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Nastel AutoPilot [EOL] is a comprehensive, end-of-life monitoring solution for businesses seeking enhanced application performance management and middleware automation.

Designed for technically adept professionals, Nastel AutoPilot [EOL] provides robust monitoring and automation capabilities aimed at streamlining middleware operations and boosting application performance. It is utilized for detecting, predicting, and resolving IT issues before they impact business operations, helping enterprises ensure reliability in critical systems.

What are the key features?

Real-Time Monitoring: Continuously observes application behavior to detect anomalies instantly.
Predictive Analytics: Anticipates potential issues, facilitating proactive management.
Automatic Problem Resolution: Automates responses to incidents, reducing manual intervention.
Middleware Support: Comprehensive integration support for middleware systems.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Increased Uptime: Minimized disruptions resulting in superior service availability.
Cost Efficiency: Reduced operational costs through automation of routine tasks.
Enhanced Performance: Optimized system performance with fewer bottlenecks.
Time Savings: Streamlined monitoring and analysis, saving valuable employee hours.

In financial services, Nastel AutoPilot [EOL] is leveraged for transaction monitoring to ensure seamless operations. In healthcare, it helps maintain critical application reliability, safeguarding patient data integrity and facilitating compliance. Its deployment varies across industries but consistently aims for IT operational excellence.

meshIQ

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Banamex, Barclays Capital, Bank of Bermuda, California Commerce Bank, Calyon Corporate and Investment Bank, CGEY, Checkfree Corporation, CIBC, CitiCard, Citicorp, New York, Citigroup Inc., CME Group Inc., Credit Agricole Indosuez Luxembourg, Credit Suisse, CRIF, Deutsche Bundesbank, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, DTCC, FannieMae, Fidelity (FMR), First Citizens Bank & Trust, Fortis Investments, GE Money Americas, GE Money Bank, HP, HP/WestLB Systems, HSBC, HSH Nordbank, IG Index, i-bp Banque, Populaire, Interpay Nederland B.V., IZB - Informatikzentrum Bayern GmbH & Co., JP Morgan, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., MGIC (Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation) NYSE, OMGEO, People's Bank (Ct), Peoples United Bank, Phoenix Informatica Bancaria S.p.A., PinkRoccade, Santander Bank, SKOFIN, Sociale Verzekeringsbank, Thomson Financial, UBS, UMB Financial Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

May 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

852,764 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.