Sparx Pro Cloud Server vs iServer comparison

Orbus Software and Sparx Systems are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Orbus Software is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Sparx Systems is ranked #25. Orbus Software holds a 4.3% mindshare in AM, compared to Sparx Systems’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Orbus Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sparx Systems users who would recommend it.

iServer

Read 18 iServer reviews

2,253 Views
1,577 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Sparx Pro Cloud Server

Read 3 Sparx Pro Cloud Server reviews

348 Views
348 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

iServer

Sparx Pro Cloud Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

iServer and Sparx Pro Cloud Server compete in enterprise architecture tools. Sparx Pro Cloud Server offers superior value due to its extensive feature set.

Features: iServer provides seamless integration with existing systems, scalability, and strong support for enterprise architecture frameworks. Sparx Pro Cloud Server offers robust collaboration tools, comprehensive model management, and extensive customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: iServer is known for a straightforward deployment process and comprehensive customer support. Sparx Pro Cloud Server offers cloud-based deployment, requiring technical expertise for optimal configuration.

Pricing and ROI: iServer typically has lower initial setup costs, appealing for short-term ROI. Sparx Pro Cloud Server's higher initial investment may offer better long-term ROI due to its features and customization potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Sparx Pro Cloud Server vs. iServer Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Sparx Pro Cloud Server vs. iServer

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iServer

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

8th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (16th)

Sparx Pro Cloud Server

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

25th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of iServer is 4.3%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sparx Pro Cloud Server is 1.4%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
iServer	4.3%
Sparx Pro Cloud Server	1.4%
Other	94.3%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

Antonios Lazanakis

Senior IT Solution Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Flexible, easy to use, and easy to import data

We use iServer to establish an enterprise architecture function in our organization iServer is a very flexible platform for defining your own enterprise architecture model. It is very easy to import data, and we also have good integration with Visual Drawing Tools and SharePoint. The solution is…

Read full review

Pawel-Gawronski

Enterprise Architect at BEC

A cloud SaaS solution for collaboration with customer support

There could be improvement in connecting to and securing this connection. Spark is not up to date on its Insight dashboard compared to competitors, but this impacts the digital experience. It is important for the team to continue working on this tool without disruption. So maybe this is an area for improvement to have a better Insight.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There were lots of different requirements, and collaboration and review is one of the biggest things. There is also Office 360 integration, and there's flexibility to use it as a database as well."

"The most valuable feature is its reporting capability. It offers various packages for different types of reports, such as business and project management reporting packs."

"The solution has wide use within Microsoft products. The integration with Microsoft products, and, in particular, Microsoft Office, is great."

"Tech support is very responsive. They solved issues within a prompt response time."

"I have to think less with this solution. It's simple."

"iServer is a very flexible platform for defining your own enterprise architecture model."

"iServer has valuable features for workflow and document management."

"This flexibility is the most helpful part in the standard version."

More iServer pros

"We have found the technical support to be helpful."

"The solution's most valuable feature is ArchiMate which I use daily."

Cons

"More visualization techniques and ways to report the data might be helpful."

"iServer should invest in enhancing the capabilities of the embedded drawing tool, draw.io."

"Requirements management needs to be improved."

"There are other solutions out there that have a better user interface."

"The modelling needs improvement, specifically forecasting capabilities and scenarios."

"iServer is a solid tool. Occasionally, we needed to contact the vendor to clarify details such as porting issues, missing components, and model specifics."

"It definitely needs help to improve the visual aspect of the solution."

"It runs relatively slowly."

More iServer cons

"The user-friendliness could be even better."

"The solution should allow easier access with enhanced customization options for web page DHTML."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of iServer is reasonable compared to other solutions."

"The solution is cheaper than its competitors."

"Aim for the exact number of people who shall define/review approve and view the processes, as it will impact the cost."

"The product has a moderate pricing."

"It's about 13K to set up and 9K for the license for three months. I think it's about 20K a year, but we haven't firmed up on pricing yet because the price depends on how long we commit to the solution."

"They offer annual subscriptions for developing countries, which are not affordable for small or medium businesses."

"The solution's Ultimate Plan costs $399 per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iServer?

iServer should invest in enhancing the capabilities of the embedded drawing tool, draw.io. draw.io is a drawing tool used to draw architectural diagrams, flow diagrams, etc. It is an alternative to...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iServer?

We use iServer to establish an enterprise architecture function in our organization.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering iServer?

I would recommend the solution to other users. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs iServer

Compared 13% of the time

LeanIX vs iServer

Compared 13% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs iServer

Compared 12% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs iServer

Compared 9% of the time

Visio vs iServer

Compared 6% of the time

More iServer Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Sparx Pro Cloud Server

Compared 30% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Sparx Pro Cloud Server

Compared 27% of the time

Sparx Prolaborate vs Sparx Pro Cloud Server

Compared 25% of the time

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs Sparx Pro Cloud Server

Compared 17% of the time

More Sparx Pro Cloud Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

January 2026

Download iServer product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

January 2026

Download Sparx Pro Cloud Server product report

Overview

iServer is a unified software platform and enterprise modeling environment that extends and enhances the familiar, market leading Microsoft Visio and Office products. Core capabilities provided by iServer include an enhanced Microsoft Visio diagramming interface, a powerful central repository for all enterprise architecture or business process models and documentation, and a range of tools for visualization, analysis and decision making.

Orbus Software

Share, review and inform

Pro Cloud Server opens your entire enterprise to your modeling efforts, enabling stakeholders to have secure access for discussion and review. WebEA, hosted on Pro Cloud Server, complements Enterprise Architect by providing a real-time view of project content, anywhere, anytime....

Sparx Systems

Sample Customers

Barclays, Cathay Pacific, Deloitte, British Gas, MasterCard

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Sparx Pro Cloud Server vs. iServer

December 2025

Free Report: Sparx Pro Cloud Server vs. iServer

Find out what your peers are saying about Sparx Pro Cloud Server vs. iServer and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Sparx Pro Cloud Server vs. iServer report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.