IRONSCALES vs Mimecast Email Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IRONSCALES Logo
757 views|438 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Mimecast Logo
979 views|813 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IRONSCALES and Mimecast Email Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IRONSCALES vs. Mimecast Email Security Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which solution do you prefer: IRONSCALES or Mimecast?
Answer: Hi Deepak, I think you first need to differentiate between a Gateway(Mimecast) and a Non-Gateway (IRONSCALES) solution. The Gateway solution is always going to be superior, as it scans your mail before it delivers it to you, that way keeping you safe. A solution like Ironscales scans your mail after it has been delivered, so the threat is basically on your account already. I would recommend Mimecast, I have been implementing this solution for the last 5 years and think it is one of the best out there.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution captures a bit more of the unknown, quantifies it, and applies intelligence to it to pick out and stop a lot of phishing emails that come through.""For me, the mobile app is most valuable. All other features are also very useful, but the mobile app makes it really easy for me to manage on the go. I don't have to be at my desk. I could be at the shops, or it could be in the evening when I am out, and I can get a notification on my phone that there is an incident that has been raised. I can sort it out very quickly without having to be at my work PC.""The report function through Gmail is probably the most valuable feature. The next most valuable features are simulation and training.""The biggest benefit is that we get fewer phishing and spam emails, so using IRONSCALES has made our environment much safer.""For what was being offered with IRONSCALES, I feel like we got an incredible deal.""Their anti-phishing platform is absolutely fantastic. The automated AI piece is amazing, and their technical support is fantastic.""The fact that it is set-and-forget is valuable. Once you turn it on, you very rarely have to micromanage it, whereas, with a lot of spam filters, you have to go in very often.""AI-driven phishing detection and incident remediation are valuable. It saves time from having to do manual analysis and investigation, and we also get alerts for phishing emails."

More IRONSCALES Pros →

"Email security is the most valuable feature of the solution.""It's good, it keeps the spam out.""Mimecast certainly helped my customers reduce phishing emails.""The product's most valuable features are impersonation protection and phishing countermeasures.""In the current environment that the world is in, everyone is trying to hack everyone else, so Project+ definitely helps a lot there.""Its administration console is very easy to use. The administration console is absolutely important because you interact with the platform through it.""URL inspection works pretty well.""The setup was easy."

More Mimecast Email Security Pros →

Cons
"There's room for improvement in the campaign management. IRONSCALES has many built-in templates that I use, but you can also build templates from scratch. However, the interface for creating custom templates needs to be updated.""IRONSCALES should bundle more features together instead of separating them and charging additional licensing fees.""I would like it if IRONSCALES had some sort of reminder mechanism, meaning IRONSCALES knows if a user completed the training or not. As long as it hasn't been completed, it keeps reminding every so often, alerts the manager, etc. Right now, it is all in the hands of the employee, and not all of them continue the process, which is a shame.""Even though they have been continuously improving it, it is not 100% there. We have had a few incidents where legitimate emails were getting blocked, and we had to manually remove those emails from quarantine. It is 90% effective or accurate because, on rare occasions, some emails from customers were not getting delivered. In one or two instances, their emails got blocked by IRONSCALES, and we had to manually remove the emails from quarantine. I would like them to improve their algorithm to avoid flagging genuine emails as malicious. I would also like to be able to whitelist certain email addresses. I'd love to be able to whitelist a particular customer.""Its UI could be improved. My pet peeve with a lot of these cloud-based systems is that a lot of times, the interface for the management is a little clunky. If you live and breathe IRONSCALES all day long, you'll obviously know where everything is just from muscle memory, but the system is not designed for people to be in it all day long. You're only supposed to occasionally look at it. When things get moved around, it is not necessarily that intuitive. I'm an IT guy, and I can pretty much take the worst UI and figure it out, but the menus and the options in the interface could be a little cleaner graphically. If you have a quick problem that you want to resolve, it takes a little bit of digging in the admin console, whereas it should take a few clicks up front.""The simulation and training piece could be improved by having more granularity in terms of scheduling how campaigns are run and allowing people to directly take the training rather than having to go through an official campaign. That's not available yet.""The integration with Google Suite needs to be better. it's something they can work on.""The only thing that I could say is that some of the reporting features could be better."

More IRONSCALES Cons →

"From an administrative point of view, Mimecast is a little bit cumbersome and difficult. It's not something that the end-user can easily find navigate themselves.""Its pricing can be improved. It is a bit expensive.""The attachment scanning feature doesn't work properly.""While it's quick and easy, the initial setup could be more user-friendly.""The solution should include more AI features instead of Mimecast's more general static configuration tooling.""The detection rates are an area for improvement.""The reaction time between a new threat being identified and Mimecast picking it up needs to be narrowed a bit.""Lately, Mimecast's outbound mail servers have been regularly blocklisted by spam filters. That didn't happen a few years back, but it seems to be a more frequent problem these days. When a server is blocklisted, it means all of my outgoing mail ends up in the recipient's junk mail. That affects my reputation and business confidence."

More Mimecast Email Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is an installation cost. Since we have this as a managed service, we pay for licensing and the managed service itself. Other than that, there are no additional costs."
  • "They are pretty much the same as all the other competitors in the market."
  • "We pay $3000 plus a little more a year for the number of employees we have, and we're not even that big. The solution is at the higher end in terms of cost. It's not the most expensive product, but I would say it's worth the price if you have a high volume of email traffic. In our case, the solution has inspected over 162,000 emails between three and four months. It saved us a lot of time and money. It's a worthwhile investment because a bad actor only has to succeed once; we must defend against everything in our business. IRONSCALES offers a sense of security and confidence from being well protected."
  • "I don't know about its pricing because I don't run the budget or pay the bills, but if it was extortionate, we probably would be looking to scrap it, and because we are not, I assume its price is okay."
  • "Considering the value it provides, it is definitely worth the cost. We don't have to do manual analysis and remediation of phishing emails, which saves us a lot of hours. Its licensing is based on the number of users being supported and the number of email addresses being protected. I'm not aware of any additional costs."
  • "As compared to everything else we looked at, it was good. It was the best value for the dollars."
  • "IRONSCALES is an expensive solution."
  • More IRONSCALES Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's an expensive solution."
  • "The licensing costs are per-user for the product that you get with them."
  • "It is a bit expensive."
  • "I'm always going to say the price needs to be lower, but it's reasonable."
  • "The customers can select the license packages as per their requirements."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a ten."
  • "Compared to the other solutions in the market, Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection's pricing is fine."
  • "For what it is, the product is overpriced."
  • More Mimecast Email Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution captures a bit more of the unknown, quantifies it, and applies intelligence to it to pick out and stop a lot of phishing emails that come through.
    Top Answer:IRONSCALES is an expensive solution. The solution has certain add-on features, and its pricing depends on how you scale it. You have to pay additional licensing fees for some specific features.
    Top Answer:IRONSCALES should bundle more features together instead of separating them and charging additional licensing fees. The solution’s scalability could be improved.
    Top Answer:The interface of this solution is very easy to navigate and user-friendly. There is no delivery in email and other communications, making it reliable. The configuration is relatively easy.
    Top Answer:Compared to the other products in the market, it is neither cheap but nor very expensive. I would rate it somewhere in the middle, five out of ten.
    Top Answer:The feature that should be included is to remove the block on the encrypted files.
    Ranking
    Views
    757
    Comparisons
    438
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    1,403
    Rating
    9.3
    Views
    979
    Comparisons
    813
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    430
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection
    Learn More
    Overview

    IRONSCALES is a leading email security platform that combines human intelligence with machine learning to detect and respond to phishing attacks.

    It offers a comprehensive suite of tools, including email threat intelligence, incident response, and automated phishing remediation. 

    With its unique self-learning technology, IRONSCALES can quickly identify and mitigate phishing threats, reducing the risk of data breaches and financial losses. 

    The platform also provides real-time alerts and actionable insights to help organizations proactively defend against evolving email threats. 

    With its user-friendly interface and seamless integration with existing email systems, IRONSCALES is a powerful solution for businesses of all sizes looking to enhance their email security.

    Mimecast Email Security is a comprehensive solution designed to safeguard organizations against advanced email threats. With an array of advanced security features, it provides robust protection against phishing attacks, malware, ransomware, and other targeted threats.

    This product leverages Mimecast's extensive threat intelligence network to identify and block malicious emails before they reach the user's inbox. It employs sophisticated algorithms and machine learning techniques to analyze email content, attachments, and URLs, ensuring that only legitimate and safe emails are delivered.

    One of the key features of Mimecast Advanced Email Security is its URL Protect capability. This feature scans all URLs within emails in real-time, checking for any signs of malicious activity. It blocks access to suspicious websites, preventing users from inadvertently clicking on harmful links and falling victim to phishing attacks or drive-by downloads.

    Another notable feature is Attachment Protect, which scans all email attachments for malware and ransomware. It uses multiple layers of defense, including sandboxing and file conversion, to detect and neutralize any threats. This ensures that users are protected from opening malicious attachments that could compromise their systems.

    Mimecast Advanced Email Security also includes Impersonation Protect, which guards against CEO fraud and other impersonation attacks. It analyzes email headers, domains, and sender behavior to identify suspicious emails that attempt to deceive users. By alerting users and administrators to potential impersonation attempts, it helps prevent financial loss and data breaches.

    Furthermore, Mimecast Advanced Email Security provides comprehensive data loss prevention (DLP) capabilities. It scans outgoing emails for sensitive information, such as credit card numbers or social security numbers, and prevents accidental or intentional data leaks. This helps organizations comply with data protection regulations and maintain the privacy of their customers' information.

    Sample Customers
    Allegheny Millwork, Ayrshire College, Nium, Orris, Paramount School District, Pres Les, PRT Staffing, Recovery Unplugged, Telit, WebHelp
    Azizi Developments, Affinity Credit Union, Aftercare, Al Abbar Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Outsourcing Company11%
    Hospitality Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    REVIEWERS
    Transportation Company17%
    Retailer17%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Construction Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Construction Company6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise54%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business52%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise32%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise45%
    Buyer's Guide
    IRONSCALES vs. Mimecast Email Security
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IRONSCALES vs. Mimecast Email Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IRONSCALES is ranked 3rd in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 11 reviews while Mimecast Email Security is ranked 5th in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 23 reviews. IRONSCALES is rated 9.2, while Mimecast Email Security is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IRONSCALES writes "It has an easy installation that can be done in a matter of minutes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mimecast Email Security writes "It gives clients peace of mind and helps them educate their users about threats". IRONSCALES is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, Sublime Security, Perception Point Advanced Email Security and Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, whereas Mimecast Email Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Abnormal Security, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration and Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway. See our IRONSCALES vs. Mimecast Email Security report.

    See our list of best Secure Email Gateway (SEG) vendors.

    We monitor all Secure Email Gateway (SEG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.