We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and Veritas Backup Exec based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"The backup potential of the solution is very good. It's protected us in the past very well and allowed us to get up and running after an attack with minimal loss."
"It has good stability. Its interface is very good, responsive, and easy for restoring data. I use it for backup, encryption, and restore operations, and it works. I am using many agents from VM to LMDP. I also use an agent for SQL Server, which has advanced options because it is the Enterprise version."
"The usability and interface of the solution are good."
"The interface, dashboard, and pricing are all perfect."
"In the global business world, Veritas has a very good name. I think they have a good solid product, and they are always trying to improve it, and update it. ;They know what the client actually needs, and they are up to the challenge of satisfying those needs."
"Veritas Backup Exec is easily managed."
"I have found the overall features of the solution very good and there is the option to backup to the cloud."
"The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"Veritas Backup Exec's support services could be faster."
"I would like to improve their ability to back up the cloud environment. Additionally, it would be nice to have simpler UI."
"A web console would be great because nowadays a lot of products are web-based and you can access the console from various environments. So I would recommend bringing this feature in the next solution."
"The pricing is an area of improvement and the mode of marketing it."
"Doesn't include disaster recovery."
"They could include backup functionality for enterprise environments."
"It is currently missing the dynamic backup feature for virtual machines, which is available in NetWorker. I can create politics in NetWorker to add virtual machines with specific tags, but I cannot do this in Backup Exec, which is a minus point for me. Currently, a user has to send a request to the Backup administrator to add a machine to the backup, but I should be able to create rules to automatically add a new machine to the backup. This kind of functionality is very important in current times, especially when we are using cloud solutions. I should be able to create more than one stream in a policy and specify how many streams I want to run in parallel in one policy. Currently, I have to manually create more policies to backup more than one virtual machine at the same time. Their support can also be improved in terms of response time."
"I have experienced some errors, such as failures, but there have not been very many."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 37th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while Veritas Backup Exec is ranked 15th in Backup and Recovery with 71 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while Veritas Backup Exec is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas Backup Exec writes "Highly stable, intuitive design, and integrates well". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, Veeam Backup & Replication and NAKIVO Backup & Replication, whereas Veritas Backup Exec is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Veritas NetBackup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Commvault Cloud and Veritas System Recovery.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.