We performed a comparison between IQMS Enterprise IQ and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."This solution has all of the features you need: sales, distribution, supply chain. It has logistics and production management capabilities. It has so many modules, which were integrated using our expertise."
"S4HANA is very scalable - we use it across seven or eight factories, and everything is running fine."
"I find the Production Planning Cockpit (PPC) and Material Requirements Planning (MRP) most valuable modules."
"The initial setup is not complex; it's more at a medium level. Not too easy, but with the right knowledge, you can configure it."
"It's helped with business aspects and improved material planning and RMA processes."
"The functionality of SAP S4HANA is very good when comparing it to others, such as Oracle, Microsoft, and other ERP solutions."
"The most valuable feature is that HANA loads from memory, which means it loads very quickly."
"The finance solution and procurement functionalities are good."
"The scalability is excellent, especially on cloud deployment models."
"Setup is very complex."
"There are some problems with the support provided for the solution, so it is not quite easy. It takes some time for them to offer us support."
"We would like to see more DevOps capabilities in the future."
"The solution could have a better user experience. However, they are working a lot on the user experience and they have come up with various applications, such as mobile applications. This was lacking over the last two years."
"SAP S4HANA could improve by having a more seamless easier integration, faster integration. The overall implementation timelines should be reduced."
"During parallel preparation of go-live processes, SAP B1 and S4H transactional data alignment can be difficult to track."
"S/4HANA could be improved with better integration. At the moment, a main issue I see is that there's so much growth in the functionality, complementary modules, and cloud solutions which were acquired by SAP and which extend the functionality of the SAP ERP suite. It looks to me that they tend to acquire more and more functionality from acquisitions, but they don't invest enough effort into making them integrated with S/4HANA or ERP. I would say that the functionality is great, but integration is something which still needs more attention. Instead of focusing on acquisitions, they should invest, integrate, and better the existing portfolio of products in SAP. It would help us, as implementors, to have a more complex or compact solution."
"The install can be difficult. There's something called secondary sales solutions that is not there in SAP. We need to have third-party tools to integrate to do the automatization. The two parts are missing on the secondary sales solution and automation."
"We are always looking for a better user experience. We would like to see more consolidation in SAP S4HANA because of all the financial compliance and regulatory changes."
IQMS Enterprise IQ is ranked 21st in ERP with 1 review while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 65 reviews. IQMS Enterprise IQ is rated 8.0, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IQMS Enterprise IQ writes "Allows customization for production and has good sales, distribution, and quality management features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". IQMS Enterprise IQ is most compared with SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Epicor ERP, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Oracle E-Business Suite.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.