Invicti vs Rapid7 AppSpider comparison

Invicti and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5, while Rapid7 is ranked #30. Invicti holds a 1.7% mindshare in SAST, compared to Rapid7’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Invicti

Read 31 Invicti reviews

5,070 Views
3,042 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews

2,042 Views
1,327 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Invicti

Rapid7 AppSpider

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Invicti and Rapid7 AppSpider compete in the web application security landscape. Invicti appears to have the upper hand with effective pricing and support.

Features: Invicti is noted for its accurate vulnerability detection, comprehensive reporting tools, and cost-effectiveness. Rapid7 AppSpider is known for its extensive integration capabilities, detailed analysis features, and advanced security assessments.

Room for Improvement: Invicti users want enhanced integration options, broader language support, and faster development of new features. Rapid7 AppSpider users seek improvements in scan speed, user experience simplification, and better adaptability to diverse environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti is recognized for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Rapid7 AppSpider, although offering strong support, is considered more complex in deployment which may deter some users.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti's competitive setup costs and significant ROI are highlighted by user reviews for balancing cost and benefits. Rapid7 AppSpider, while perceived as more expensive, is justified by its comprehensive features and integration, delivering solid ROI for more robust needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Invicti vs. Rapid7 AppSpider Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,915 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (24th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (8th), API Security (9th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (4th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th)

Rapid7 AppSpider

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Invicti is 1.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Invicti	1.7%
Rapid7 AppSpider	0.8%
Other	97.5%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Valavan Sivgalingam

Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS

Dynamic testing regularly identifies web vulnerabilities and has strong false positive confirmations

It has good false positive confirmations, confirmed issues identification, and proof of exploit-related features as part of it. We use Invicti for these things in our portfolios. The solution includes Proof-Based Scanning technology. Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios. For both the API endpoints and web applications, we do regular testing on a monthly basis for all our releases. Invicti does a good job. The only concern is on the performance side, but other than that, we find it really helpful in identifying web vulnerabilities. A full scan takes more time based on your website and other factors, but for us, it takes more than two to three days. The scan performance can be improved upon. When we check with them, they discuss proof-based scanning and related aspects. However, there could be intermittent results that could help us.

Read full review

Hiroshi Watanabe

Marketing Expert at J's communication

Clients benefit from broad authentication and effective crawling but need localization improvements

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that it's stable and technical support is great."

"Invicti's best feature is the ability to identify vulnerabilities and manually verify them."

"I would definitely recommend it to those who really want to know in-depth details of their applications/products regarding security."

"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."

"Crawling feature: Netsparker has very detail crawling steps and mechanisms. This feature expands the attack surface."

"When we try to manually exploit the vulnerabilities, it often takes time to realize what's going on and what needs to be done."

"The solution generates reports automatically and quickly and it's a very user-friendly product."

"It has a comprehensive resulting mechanism. It is a one-stop solution for all your security testing mechanisms."

More Invicti pros

"It does a scan that performs about 100 checks on web applications and produces a clear report on all of the vulnerabilities that are found."

"The initial deployment is very straightforward and simple."

"Customer service has been quite good."

"It is really accurate and the rate of false positives is very low."

"I would say that it is stable, as I am not aware of any major issues."

"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 AppSpider is the vulnerability reporting data. Additionally, the data is reported in a convenient way rather than seeing them as a PDF. We are able to generate all the reports exactly what we want in a flexible way."

"Rapid7 AppSpider is good at managing different applications. It uses applets and generates reports to cover the PCA/GDPR compliance requirements."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

Cons

"They don't really provide the proof of concept up to the level that we need in our organization. We are a consultancy firm, and we provide consultancy for the implementation and deployment solutions to our customers. When you run the scans and the scan is completed, it only shows the proof of exploit, which really doesn't work because the tool is running the scan and exploiting on the read-only form. You don't really know whether it is actually giving the proof of exploit. We cannot prove it manually to a customer that the exploit is genuine. It is really hard to perform it manually and prove it to the concerned development, remediation, and security teams. It is currently missing the static application security part of the application security, especially web application security. It would be really cool if they can integrate a SAS tool with their dynamic one."

"The licensing model should be improved to be more cost-effective. There are URL restrictions that consume our license. Compared to other DAST solutions and task tools like WebInspect and Burp Enterprise, Invicti is very expensive. The solution’s scanning time is also very long compared to other DAST tools. It might be due to proof-based scanning."

"The license could be better. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license. It's a major hindrance that we are facing while scanning applications, and we have to be sure that the URLs are the same and not different so that we do not end up consuming another license for it. Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted. If you have a URL that you scanned once, like a website, you cannot retry that same license. If you are scanning the same website but in a different domain or different URL, you might end up paying for a second license. It would also be better if they provided proper support for multi-factor authentications. In the next release, I would like them to include good multi-factor authentication support."

"I think that it freezes without any specific reason at times. This needs to be looked into."

"Reporting should be improved. The reporting options should be made better for end-users. Currently, it is possible, but it's not the best. Being able to choose what I want to see in my reports rather than being given prefixed information would make my life easier. I had to depend on the API for getting the content that I wanted. If they could fix the reporting feature to make it more comprehensive and user-friendly, it would help a lot of end-users. Everything else was good about this product."

"When scanning a large web-based application, it tends to process slow and takes a long time especially on crawling and attacking part."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"The higher level vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting, SQL Injection, and other higher level injection attacks are difficult to highlight using Netsparker."

More Invicti cons

"The solution is too slow. It could take a full day to scan. Competitors are much faster."

"Support response times are slow and can be improved."

"Implementing Rapid7 AppSpider requires scanning and self-identification mechanisms. You can add different types of authentication to each scan."

"The product needs to be able to scale for large companies, like ours. We have millions of IP addresses that need to be scanned, and the scalability is not great."

"Support response times are slow and can be improved."

"The tech support is responsive but issues remain unresolved."

"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."

"It needs better integration with mobile applications."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"It is competitive in the security market."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

"The price is pretty fair."

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,915 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

11%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 9% of the time

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 9% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 8% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

May 2026

Download Invicti product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider

April 2026

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Also Known As

Netsparker

AppSpider

Overview

Invicti offers advanced web application security testing focused on identifying vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Its Proof-Based Scanning minimizes false positives and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, making it an effective tool for enterprise environments.

Invicti provides comprehensive scanning capabilities that include detecting and verifying critical vulnerabilities and security data consolidation. Its scalable scanning engine and robust API support allow for flexible testing across diverse environments, including web and API testing. Despite some drawbacks like limited single sign-on integration and slow scanning speeds for large applications, Invicti remains a popular choice for automating security assessments, ensuring compliance with standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, and GDPR.

What are the key features of Invicti?

Comprehensive Vulnerability Scanning: Detects vulnerabilities like SQL injection and XSS.
Proof-Based Scanning: Confirms exploitability and reduces false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development pipelines.
Security Data Consolidation: Centralizes data for better insights.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy analysis and reporting.
Scalable Scanning Engine: Supports testing in enterprise environments.
Robust API Support: Enhances flexibility in testing.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Proactive Security: Actively identifies and verifies vulnerabilities to prevent breaches.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps maintain compliance with standards like PCI DSS and GDPR.
Efficient Vulnerability Management: Aids in prioritizing remediation efforts.
Integration Capabilities: Streamlines processes with CI/CD pipeline compatibility.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Invicti is implemented to bolster security through automated vulnerability assessments. Its ability to provide insightful reports and remediation suggestions assists companies in efficiently managing security risks and achieving compliance with critical regulatory standards.

Invicti

Rapid7 AppSpider provides rapid vulnerability detection and comprehensive reporting, integrating seamlessly with development cycles to enhance web application security. It is widely recognized for its detailed remediation steps and compliance with international standards like ISO27001.

Renowned for its robust security assessment capabilities, Rapid7 AppSpider stands out by offering advanced crawling technology and interactive interface features. Despite its slower performance compared to some competitors, it efficiently manages applications with configurable reporting and a focus on reducing false positives. Users find its automation and extensive integration capabilities valuable, although they indicate a need for improved interface enhancements and better report localization for specific regions like Japan.

What are the key features of Rapid7 AppSpider?

Rapid Vulnerability Detection: Quickly identifies security issues within applications.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed, configurable reports for thorough analysis.
International Compliance: Aligns with standards such as ISO27001 for security assurance.
Extensive Integration: Integrates with various software development life cycles.
Interactive Interface: User-friendly design enhances ease of use and engagement.
Automation: Streamlines processes with automated scanning capabilities.
Portability: Easily managed across different environments and platforms.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating Rapid7 AppSpider?

Detailed Remediation Steps: Provides guidance on addressing identified vulnerabilities.
Low False Positives: Ensures higher accuracy in scan results.
Compliance Control: Helps maintain adherence to security standards and regulations.
API Auditing Capabilities: Extensive checks on web application interfaces.
Comprehensive Reports: Detailed documentation aids in security decision-making.

In sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology, companies leverage Rapid7 AppSpider to enhance their security management. It plays an integral role in vulnerability assessment processes, aiding in the compliance with international security standards and reforms in security testing strategies, especially during auditing and routine application scans.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

April 2026

Free Report: Invicti vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti vs. Rapid7 AppSpider and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,915 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Invicti vs. Rapid7 AppSpider report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.