HCL AppScan vs Invicti comparison

Read 31 Invicti reviews

3,717 Views
855 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

HCL AppScan and Invicti are key competitors in the application security testing domain. Invicti seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and high user satisfaction, overshadowing HCL AppScan’s robust testing capabilities.

Features: HCL AppScan is noted for advanced scanning tools, detailed reporting, and addressing vulnerabilities efficiently. Invicti offers strong automation capabilities, ease of integration into existing development workflows, and streamlined processes which many users find more effective.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan could focus on improving its learning curve, enhancing dashboards for better usability, and offering more intuitive interfaces. Invicti should work on refining reporting features, providing more detailed scan insights, and improving report comprehensiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan users experience a steep deployment curve but commend its customer service. Invicti provides a simpler deployment process and receives positive feedback for responsive support, making it more accessible for quick setup and assistance.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan has competitive pricing and delivers satisfactory ROI for those prioritizing comprehensive scanning. Invicti, despite a higher price point, is valued for its advanced capabilities and automation, leading to a perceived strong ROI especially by those prioritizing efficiency and thoroughness.

To learn more, read our detailed HCL AppScan vs. Invicti Report (Updated: March 2026).

HCL AppScan vs. Invicti

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

17th

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (19th)

Invicti

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

11th

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (24th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (8th), API Security (8th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of HCL AppScan is 9.5%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 8.3%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Invicti	8.3%
HCL AppScan	9.5%
Other	82.2%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

Ravi Khanchandani

Founder Director at Techsa Services

Has improved identification of encryption and authentication issues across cloud and on-prem applications

During the learning curve of onboarding HCL AppScan, we learned that HCL has altered the portfolio and now offers HCL AppScan 360, which has a much better look and feel with an improved user interface. However, there is one feature called SCA, which stands for Software Composition Analysis, that could be improved. When I'm doing an application scan, HCL AppScan has the ability to generate information about what components are in use. For example, if I'm scanning a web application, it shows me the various components being used. It tells me whether I have Java libraries, .NET frameworks, or other log management libraries such as Log4j, and what versions of those specific components are present. I would like to see more detailed reports from the tool. Currently, you can find out the components belonging to a specific software, but if detailed reporting became available, you would be in a better position to identify vulnerabilities. For instance, I could identify that I had the Log4j vulnerability and know that I need to fix my application accordingly. If they add the features I'm describing, I would consider giving them a higher rating. However, I've only been experienced with the product for three months.

Read full review

Valavan Sivgalingam

Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS

Dynamic testing regularly identifies web vulnerabilities and has strong false positive confirmations

It has good false positive confirmations, confirmed issues identification, and proof of exploit-related features as part of it. We use Invicti for these things in our portfolios. The solution includes Proof-Based Scanning technology. Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios. For both the API endpoints and web applications, we do regular testing on a monthly basis for all our releases. Invicti does a good job. The only concern is on the performance side, but other than that, we find it really helpful in identifying web vulnerabilities. A full scan takes more time based on your website and other factors, but for us, it takes more than two to three days. The scan performance can be improved upon. When we check with them, they discuss proof-based scanning and related aspects. However, there could be intermittent results that could help us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers services in a few specific development languages."

"Compared to other tools only AppScan supports special language."

"It is an application for security assessment or scanning for static environments, and with all customers, it is performing well."

"I mainly use AppScan for vulnerability scanning and database bridging."

"It's generally a very user-friendly tool. Anyone can easily learn how to scan"

"This solution saves us time due to the low number of false positives detected."

"I prefer Appscan, as it much more user friendly, and it detects cross-site scripting and SQL injection issues much better than other tools in the market."

"The HCL AppScan performance is both stable and reliable."

More HCL AppScan pros

"I am impressed with Invictus’ proof-based scanning. The solution has reduced the incidence of false positive vulnerabilities. It has helped us reduce our time and focus on vulnerabilities."

"It has very good integration with the CI/CD pipeline."

"I would definitely recommend to those who really want to know in-depth details of their applications/products regarding the security of their web system."

"One of the features I like about this program is the low number of false positives and the support it offers."

"We use simultaneous products, but I found this to be the best of the lot."

"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."

"It correctly parses DOM and JS and has really good support for URL Rewrite rules, which is important for today's websites."

"The dashboard is really cool, and the features are really good. It tells you about the software version you're using in your web application. It gives you the entire technology stack, and that really helps. Both web and desktop apps are good in terms of application scanning. It has a lot of security checks that are easily customizable as per your requirements. It also has good customer support."

More Invicti pros

Cons

"I think it's a little bit complex, and that's quite a common issue with most of the IBM products."

"We would like to see a check in the specific vulnerabilities in mobile applications or rooted devices, such as jailbreaking devices."

"The product has some technical limitations."

"There is one feature called SCA, which stands for Software Composition Analysis, that could be improved."

"The penetration testing feature should be included."

"The databases for HCL are small and have room for improvement."

"Improving usability could enhance the overall experience with AppScan. It would be beneficial to make the solution more user-friendly, ensuring that everyone can easily navigate and utilize its features."

"I think being able to search across more containers, especially some of the docker elements. We need a little tighter integration there. That's the only thing I can see at this point."

More HCL AppScan cons

"The support's response time could be faster since we are in different time zones."

"Netsparker doesn't provide the source code of the static application security testing."

"The solution needs to make a more specific report."

"Maybe the ability to make a good reporting format is needed."

"The license could be better. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license. It's a major hindrance that we are facing while scanning applications, and we have to be sure that the URLs are the same and not different so that we do not end up consuming another license for it. Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted. If you have a URL that you scanned once, like a website, you cannot retry that same license. If you are scanning the same website but in a different domain or different URL, you might end up paying for a second license. It would also be better if they provided proper support for multi-factor authentications. In the next release, I would like them to include good multi-factor authentication support."

"Right now, they are missing the static application security part, especially web application security."

"They need to improve their support in the documentation. Their support mechanism is missing. Their responsiveness, technical staff, and these types of things need to be improved, and comprehensive documentation is required. They should have good self-service portal enhancement"

"They don't really provide the proof of concept up to the level that we need in our organization."

More Invicti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheap."

"The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."

"With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

"The price is very expensive."

"Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."

"HCL AppScan is expensive."

"The product has premium pricing and could be more competitive."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

"It is competitive in the security market."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	31

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?

The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

I'm currently working with BigFix and HCL AppScan. At least three people in my company are using HCL AppScan. Since we are a reseller, we run it in both lab environments and live production applica...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs HCL AppScan

Comparisons

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 9% of the time

SonarQube vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

Coverity Static vs HCL AppScan

Compared 2% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 9% of the time

SonarQube vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Invicti

Compared 3% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Product Reports

HCL AppScan

Download HCL AppScan product report

Download Invicti product report

Also Known As

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

Netsparker

Overview

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

HCLSoftware

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

HCL AppScan vs. Invicti