HCL AppScan vs Invicti comparison

Read 31 Invicti reviews

7,541 Views
2,111 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

HCL AppScan and Invicti are major competitors in the application security testing field. HCL AppScan seems to have the upper hand in integration within the SDLC, whereas Invicti excels in proof-based scanning and false positive reduction.

Features: HCL AppScan features comprehensive integration with the SDLC, supporting API and scalable solutions backed by technical assistance. Its standout ability is identifying reflected XSS vulnerabilities. Invicti impresses with its proof-based scanning, offering a low false positive rate and comprehensive vulnerability explanations. Invicti's authentication options and DevOps integration flexibility make it a favored choice for proactive vulnerability management.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan could improve CI/CD integration, user experience, and expand language support. Invicti needs to enhance performance during full scans and reporting capabilities. Pricing models and responsiveness of technical support are additional areas for Invicti to improve, along with better integration with API tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan offers deployment flexibility across public, hybrid, and on-premises environments with varying tech support reviews. Invicti provides robust deployment options for public and on-premises setups but can improve tech support resources and response times.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is deemed expensive, with mixed opinions on pricing competitiveness. However, it boasts strong ROI through reduced vulnerabilities and efficient integration. Invicti, though costly, provides flexible licensing for large enterprises with a competitive subscription-based pricing model. Despite the strong ROI, it needs to improve accessibility for small and medium-sized businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed HCL AppScan vs. Invicti Report (Updated: September 2026).

Download the complete report

HCL AppScan vs. Invicti

September 2026

Helped 912,069 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

20th

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (23rd)

Invicti

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

12th

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (24th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (10th), API Security (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of HCL AppScan is 8.6%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 8.4%, up from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Invicti	8.4%
HCL AppScan	8.6%
Other	83.0%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

Ravi Khanchandani

Founder Director at Techsa Services

Has improved identification of encryption and authentication issues across cloud and on-prem applications

During the learning curve of onboarding HCL AppScan, we learned that HCL has altered the portfolio and now offers HCL AppScan 360, which has a much better look and feel with an improved user interface. However, there is one feature called SCA, which stands for Software Composition Analysis, that could be improved. When I'm doing an application scan, HCL AppScan has the ability to generate information about what components are in use. For example, if I'm scanning a web application, it shows me the various components being used. It tells me whether I have Java libraries, .NET frameworks, or other log management libraries such as Log4j, and what versions of those specific components are present. I would like to see more detailed reports from the tool. Currently, you can find out the components belonging to a specific software, but if detailed reporting became available, you would be in a better position to identify vulnerabilities. For instance, I could identify that I had the Log4j vulnerability and know that I need to fix my application accordingly. If they add the features I'm describing, I would consider giving them a higher rating. However, I've only been experienced with the product for three months.

Read full review

PrashantUppuluri

Solution Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automated scanning has strengthened web application security and supports hybrid protection

A good scanning engine is what I appreciate about Invicti. When you want to find out the vulnerabilities within your web applications, Invicti has done a thorough job with respect to filtering out the vulnerabilities and identifying the risk factors with respect to the security modules within the solution. Invicti does have a segment of the solution which works on the automated scanning engine. As long as the license is active, the scanners that work within the solution are pretty effective. With respect to SAST and DAST, being a real-time scanning engine is one of the portfolios and one of the selling factors of the solution. Invicti is known to be a solution that works within the hybrid environment, be it cloud, on-premises, or a mix and match across multiple marketplaces. It does a thorough job. Most importantly, Invicti is a very good SAST and DAST solution that is very competitive in the market with respect to competitors. Invicti is a part of the Magic Quadrant with respect to Gartner's Magic Quadrant and has made a very good customer database and pipeline within the marketplace locally. With respect to security impacts in terms of support, Invicti is pretty much supportive. With respect to use cases or the POCs I have run on the solution, we have identified a couple of vulnerabilities and Invicti was able to trace them, detect, and quarantine the attacks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SAST is the only feature that works using the on-prem version."

"The support I have received has been good."

"The static scans are good, and the SaaS as well."

"I prefer Appscan, as it much more user friendly, and it detects cross-site scripting and SQL injection issues much better than other tools in the market."

"We use it as a security testing application."

"The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase."

"For its first initial release, the integration was pretty good."

"It identifies all the URLs and domains on its own and then performs tests and provides the results."

More HCL AppScan pros

"Its ability to crawl a web application is quite different than another similar scanner, and sometimes it can find more vulnerabilities that another scanner can’t."

"It has a comprehensive resulting mechanism. It is a one-stop solution for all your security testing mechanisms."

"I'd recommend Netsparker for anyone who wants to make a security assessment for web applications."

"This tool is really fast and the information that they provide on vulnerabilities is pretty good."

"It is a very good tool."

"I would rate the stability as ten out of ten."

"Technical support is very professional, 10/10."

"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."

More Invicti pros

Cons

"We have experienced challenges when trying to integrate this solution with other products. When you compare it with the other SecOps products, the quality of the output is too low. It is not a new-age product. It is very outdated."

"The penetration testing feature should be included."

"We would like to integrate with some of the other reporting tools that we're planning to use in the future."

"The solution needs to improve in some areas. The tool needs to add more languages. It also needs to improve its speed."

"Scans become slow on large websites."

"It's a little bit basic when you talk about the Web Services. If AppScan improved its maturity on Web Services testing, that would be good."

"Better detection of DOM-based XSS Better remediation guidance using code examples and contexts"

"The performance could be better. Sometimes it doesn't work so well."

More HCL AppScan cons

"The higher level vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting, SQL Injection, and other higher level injection attacks are difficult to highlight using Netsparker."

"The scan performance can be improved upon."

"Netsparker doesn't provide the source code of the static application security testing."

"Improvement could be made in the area of production."

"The proxy review, the use report views, the current use tool and the subset requests need some improvement. It was hard to understand how to use them."

"The support's response time could be faster since we are in different time zones."

"The license could be better. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license. It's a major hindrance that we are facing while scanning applications, and we have to be sure that the URLs are the same and not different so that we do not end up consuming another license for it. Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted. If you have a URL that you scanned once, like a website, you cannot retry that same license. If you are scanning the same website but in a different domain or different URL, you might end up paying for a second license. It would also be better if they provided proper support for multi-factor authentications. In the next release, I would like them to include good multi-factor authentication support."

"The solution needs to make a more specific report."

More Invicti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."

"With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."

"The solution is moderately priced."

"The product has premium pricing and could be more competitive."

"The tool was expensive."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."

"The price is very expensive."

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,069 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	31

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

I'm currently working with BigFix and HCL AppScan. At least three people in my company are using HCL AppScan. Since we are a reseller, we run it in both lab environments and live production applica...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HCL AppScan?

AppScan is considered more cost-effective than Veracode, although I have not updated the exact pricing details. Companies often choose based on budget constraints, with Veracode being on the higher...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan

Comparisons

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs HCL AppScan

Compared 6% of the time

SonarQube vs HCL AppScan

Compared 5% of the time

Bright vs HCL AppScan

Compared 3% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 8% of the time

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

SonarQube vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Product Reports

Download HCL AppScan product report

HCL AppScan

August 2026

Download Invicti product report

August 2026

Also Known As

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

Netsparker

Overview

HCL AppScan offers quick vulnerability detection with effective SDLC integration and is known for its user-friendly interface and seamless security integration.

HCL AppScan provides dynamic and static scanning to identify vulnerabilities like XSS and SQL injection. It integrates well into CI/CD pipelines, supports multiple languages, and offers web and dynamic scanning, helping businesses ensure security across development lifecycles. Users benefit from API coverage, Postman integration, and its ability to function in cloud and on-premise environments, facilitating a shift from DevOps to DevSecOps practices.

What features define HCL AppScan?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and usage.
Vulnerability detection: Quickly identifies issues like XSS and SQL injection.
Integration with SDLC: Seamlessly blends with development processes.
Dynamic scanning: Offers comprehensive security evaluations.
Multiple language support: Supports diverse programming environments.

What benefits should users consider?

Scalability: Adapts to growing needs and projects.
Low false-positive rates: Delivers accurate and reliable results.
Detailed reporting: Provides comprehensive vulnerability insights.
Effective integration: Enhances CI/CD pipeline security.

HCL AppScan is leveraged in sectors requiring rigorous security checks, such as finance and healthcare, where it conducts comprehensive scans and offers insights into potential vulnerabilities. Its robust scanning capabilities aid companies in maintaining compliance and security standards.

HCLSoftware

Invicti offers advanced web application security testing focused on identifying vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Its Proof-Based Scanning minimizes false positives and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, making it an effective tool for enterprise environments.

Invicti provides comprehensive scanning capabilities that include detecting and verifying critical vulnerabilities and security data consolidation. Its scalable scanning engine and robust API support allow for flexible testing across diverse environments, including web and API testing. Despite some drawbacks like limited single sign-on integration and slow scanning speeds for large applications, Invicti remains a popular choice for automating security assessments, ensuring compliance with standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, and GDPR.

What are the key features of Invicti?

Comprehensive Vulnerability Scanning: Detects vulnerabilities like SQL injection and XSS.
Proof-Based Scanning: Confirms exploitability and reduces false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development pipelines.
Security Data Consolidation: Centralizes data for better insights.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy analysis and reporting.
Scalable Scanning Engine: Supports testing in enterprise environments.
Robust API Support: Enhances flexibility in testing.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Proactive Security: Actively identifies and verifies vulnerabilities to prevent breaches.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps maintain compliance with standards like PCI DSS and GDPR.
Efficient Vulnerability Management: Aids in prioritizing remediation efforts.
Integration Capabilities: Streamlines processes with CI/CD pipeline compatibility.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Invicti is implemented to bolster security through automated vulnerability assessments. Its ability to provide insightful reports and remediation suggestions assists companies in efficiently managing security risks and achieving compliance with critical regulatory standards.

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank