InfluxDB vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service comparison

InfluxData and Oracle are both solutions in the Open Source Databases category. InfluxData is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0, while Oracle is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6. InfluxData holds a 4.0% mindshare in OSD, compared to Oracle’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfluxData users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

InfluxDB

Read 11 InfluxDB reviews

1,708 Views
366 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 21 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

274 Views
136 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

InfluxDB and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service compete in the cloud database industry. InfluxDB's focus on time-series data provides an advantage for analytics, while Oracle MySQL excels in integration within the Oracle ecosystem.

Features: InfluxDB supports high write and query loads, offers native time-series data handling, and includes integrations like Grafana for monitoring. Oracle MySQL is recognized for its transactional capabilities, seamless Oracle services integration, and advanced data management tools.

Room for Improvement: InfluxDB could benefit from simplifying its custom configuration requirements, offering better native support options, and expanding its feature set to include more transactional capabilities. Oracle MySQL could improve by enhancing its scalability, offering better pricing models for smaller teams, and providing more open-source contributions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle MySQL's deployment process is straightforward, supported by robust infrastructure and comprehensive documentation. InfluxDB offers flexibility for time-series use cases but may require additional configurations. Oracle's customer service delivers comprehensive support, while InfluxDB appeals to those with specific technical requirements.

Pricing and ROI: InfluxDB typically has a lower initial setup cost, attracting smaller teams focused on IoT and DevOps monitoring, offering good ROI for specific scenarios. Oracle MySQL may have higher costs due to its comprehensive features but provides significant ROI for businesses already utilizing Oracle’s ecosystem.

To learn more, read our detailed InfluxDB vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfluxDB

Ranking in Open Source Databases

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (2nd), Network Monitoring Software (23rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (23rd), NoSQL Databases (3rd)

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Open Source Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of InfluxDB is 4.0%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

DeepakR

Site Reliability Engineer(Observability) at Sapiens

An open-source database that can be used to insert data

InfluxDB is generally stable, but we've encountered issues with the configuration file in our ticket stack. For instance, a mistake in one of the metrics out of a hundred KPIs can disrupt data collection for all KPIs. This happens because the agent stops working if there's an issue with any configuration part. To address this, it is essential to ensure that all configurations are part of the agent's EXE file when provided. This makes it easier to package the agent for server installation and ensures all KPIs are available from the server. Additionally, the agent cannot encrypt and decrypt passwords for authentication, which can be problematic when monitoring URLs or requiring authentication tokens. This requires additional scripting and can prolong service restart times.

Read full review

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"While I would rate InfluxDB a ten on a scale of one to ten, users should be thoughtful about matching the engine to their specific needs."

"InfluxDB's best feature is that it's a cloud offering. Other good features include its time-series DB, fast time-bulk queries, and window operations."

"The most valuable features are aggregating the data and integration with Graphana for monitoring."

"In our case, it started with a necessity to fill the gap that we had in monitoring. We had very reactive monitoring without trend analysis and without some advanced features. We were able to implement them by using a time series database. We are able to have all the data from applications, logs, and systems, and we can use a simple query language to correlate all the data and make things happen, especially with monitoring. We could more proactively monitor our systems and our players' trends."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is we can use InfluxDB to integrate with and plug into any other tools."

"The platform operates very quickly. It is easy to configure, connect, and query and integrates seamlessly with Grafana."

"InfluxDB works as expected with excellent scalability and stability, which is critical for our application."

"The most valuable features of InfluxDB are the documentation and performance, and the good plugins metrics in the ecosystem."

More InfluxDB pros

"MySQL is a centralized RDBMS in itself, and you don't have the overkill of having the full Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server. It's ideal, and it helps with the developer console. It has three versions for developers. It's a very good tool for open source."

"The stability of the solution is very good. I wouldn't have used it for the past seven years if I was not satisfied."

"The access to a suite of management and administration tools that simplify tasks such as database provisioning, configuration, and monitoring."

"The solution overall is very, very good. It's got good integration with other databases and adds new features often."

"The product is good for tuning."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to manage and install."

"The product is easy to learn."

"It's easy to use."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

Cons

"InfluxDB is generally stable, but we've encountered issues with the configuration file in our ticket stack. For instance, a mistake in one of the metrics out of a hundred KPIs can disrupt data collection for all KPIs. This happens because the agent stops working if there's an issue with any configuration part. To address this, it is essential to ensure that all configurations are part of the agent's EXE file when provided. This makes it easier to package the agent for server installation and ensures all KPIs are available from the server. Additionally, the agent cannot encrypt and decrypt passwords for authentication, which can be problematic when monitoring URLs or requiring authentication tokens. This requires additional scripting and can prolong service restart times."

"InfluxDB cannot be used for high-cardinality data. It's also difficult and time-consuming to write queries, and there are some issues with bulk API."

"In terms of features that I would like to see or have, in the community version, some features are not available. I would like to have clustering and authentication in the community version."

"InfluxDB can improve by including new metrics on other technologies. They had some changes recently to pool data from endpoints but the functionality is not good enough in the industry."

"The solution's UI can be more user-friendly."

"One area for improvement is the querying language. InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying."

"The error logging capability can be improved because the logs are not very informative."

"It is challenging to get long-running backups while running InfluxDB in a Microsoft Azure Kubernetes cluster."

More InfluxDB cons

"The technical support is in need of improvement."

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"There could be more courses where the people could learn more easily how to use the tool."

"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."

"The solution should offer memory management."

"Improvement could be made in the workflow, particularly when it comes to making changes or implementing certain functions."

"Integrating business intelligence or NLP solutions would help us save time and would prevent us from having to take a deep dive. Data problems seem to multiply on the system when you interact with it. Automation would save a lot of man-hours."

"The tool’s stability must be improved."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

"InfluxDB recently increased its price. It is very expensive now."

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"The product is expensive."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"It is an open-source product."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"The license is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about InfluxDB?

InfluxDB is a database where you can insert data. However, it would be best if you had different components for alerting, data sending, and visualization. You need to install tools to collect data ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

It is challenging to get long-running backups while running InfluxDB in a Microsoft Azure Kubernetes cluster. Replicating data for on-prem development and testing is difficult. Having a SQL abstrac...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

InfluxDB is the main component in our large enterprise-scale streaming data application for maritime vessels. We collect position data from vessels around the coast once per second, put it on a Kaf...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

See all answers

Comparisons

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 25% of the time

MongoDB vs InfluxDB

Compared 20% of the time

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

ScyllaDB vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

Cassandra vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 44% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 31% of the time

PostgreSQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 24% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

June 2025

Download InfluxDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

May 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Overview

InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.

InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.

InfluxDB offers its users:

Infrastructure and application monitoring: Collect, process, and analyze real-time data from edge devices to help optimize distributed infrastructure.

IoT monitoring and analytics: InfluxDB is designed to store large volumes of time series data and quickly perform real-time analysis on that data. Gain insights from all the sensor data and use the collected data to create and perform automated tasks.

Network monitoring: Manage responsive and high-performing networks with widely distributed resources.

InfluxDB Benefits

There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

APIs and ready toolset: InfluxDB can be accessed via a set of powerful tools enabling users to get started quickly, with less programming required. This includes a REST API, extensive client libraries, a wide variety of open-source integrations, and Flux - a functional data scripting language for querying, analysis, and events. The InfluxDB API can be used to write data from edge devices to the InfluxDB instance

Time series engine: Get any data - events, logs, traces - from any edge device - systems, sensors, queues, databases, and networks. This data is stored in a powerful and high-performing engine capable of ingesting millions of data points per second.

Community: InfluxDB has a large community of cloud and open-source developers ready to assist users.

Ready-made templates: Use InfluxDB Templates, a set of tools with a packager and other ready monitoring solutions. These tools allow users to share their monitoring expertise with coworkers and other community members around the world. The Templates gallery offers available templates for some of the most popular tools and applications.

Enhanced UI: InfluxDB’s UI includes an explorer, dashboarding tools, and a script editor. Use it to easily browse the collected metric and event data and apply common transformations. The dashboarding tool comes with a variety of visualization options that help users view insights from the data. The script editor assists users to quickly master Flux with easily accessible examples, auto-completion, and real-time syntax checking.

Reviews from Real Users

InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.

Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”

InfluxData

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

Sample Customers

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

June 2025

Free Report: InfluxDB vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxDB vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfluxDB vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.

We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.