OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence comparison

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence and SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence are both solutions in the Mainframe Management category. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is ranked #5 with an average rating of 6.0, while SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.0. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence holds a 4.7% mindshare in MM, compared to SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence’s 9.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence users who would recommend it.

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Read 28 OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reviews

905 Views
344 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SYSVIEW Performance Intelli...

Read 28 SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence reviews

920 Views
920 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

SYSVIEW Performance Intelli...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence and SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Mainframe Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,515 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Mainframe Management

5th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (10th)

SYSVIEW Performance Intelli...

Ranking in Mainframe Management

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Mainframe Management category, the mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 4.7%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence is 9.8%, down from 14.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mainframe Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence	9.8%
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence	4.7%
Other	85.5%

Mainframe Management

Featured Reviews

Sakkamon Rapeepisarn

System Programmer at Krungsri

Automation has improved alerts and file handling but script-based setup still needs simplification

OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is the automation tool I use. I think OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is good for creating complex rules because it's coding, but it takes time to learn how to use it. OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence works well if you know the syntax very well and you have experience in creating scripts or REXX syntax; it would be very good and is a good tool, but it takes time to learn, so that is for experienced staff to work with. I would rate the product a six from one to ten. I cannot think of any additional features in the next release of OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence.

Read full review

Sakkamon Rapeepisarn

System Programmer at Krungsri

Real-time monitoring has improved incident response but still needs built-in history and prediction

A long-term performance database in SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence would be beneficial to see historical performance for the long term and observe trends. Currently, a program must be created to gather data, and it should be part of the product with a built-in database inside SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence so that a custom program to gather data and keep it somewhere is not necessary. Prediction capability is not available in SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence—the kind of machine learning intelligence desired, such as the ability to predict patterns or seasonality or month-end behavior. However, if there is a chance to use WatchTower, this ability might be gained.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It allows us to respond faster to issues. If there are issues that come out, we're able to capture a message and alert somebody about it."

"It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs."

"The documentation is simple, easy to follow, and use. A limited, first-time systems programmer can do it, in that it is out-of-the-box almost functional."

"Their technical support is incredible, immediately responsive, and even if it is not updated to Level 2 support sometimes, they chip in providing more detailed answers and options to fix the problem."

"The performance of it is beyond exceptional. It is probably one of the best products that I have ever worked with. It is easy to use, comprehensive, and can perform almost any task you need it to."

"Once automatic IPL has been defined, anyone can perform an IPL with very little intervention. We know that all of the components will be started correctly."

"It's very flexible. You can customize what you need to, which is good. For example, you can do your own coding inside the tool, make your own scripting tooling."

"If something breaks and it goes down when it's not supposed to, automation brings it right back up."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

"When we changed to JES3, the programmers didn't have to know anything. The product provided the same interface with the same look and feel."

"The stability is very reliable. We have not had any issues."

"Thresholds with alerts are valuable, enabling us to fix a problem before it has an impact."

"We have not had any major issues in approximately 15 years."

"I also really appreciated all the work that everybody did to get it functional for JES3, and they continue to do so, even though IBM said they are going to do away with JES3."

"Between the tech support and the person I was working with, they have been extraordinary."

"The scalability is absolutely fine."

"Ability for system diagnostics"

More SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence pros

Cons

"One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky."

"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script."

"My impressions on OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is that it's quite difficult to use, as it relies mainly on the coding syntax and doesn't provide an easy-to-use GUI."

"The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into."

"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."

"It’s a complex product. The initial installation is easy, but implementing various functions is a constant process."

"The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better. CA Common Services interfaces - namely Zdata Mover, Zmessage Service, Zdatacolletcor - are poorly documented."

"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

"They are already working on improvements. One of them is the operational intelligence, which is a lot of stuff I am trying to learn and work on right now, which SYSVIEW reports to that all the system things which are going on."

"It confuses a lot of people because there are so many features, but when they see me bouncing around they say, "I didn't know it did that, I didn't know it did that." It takes a long time to find all the different features that are available."

"The things that I would think about would be in relation to JES3. However, I don't know if they'll be able to do much more with that because I don't know how much longer IBM is going to be supporting JES3. So I can understand not doing additional development. But if I were to suggest something it would be the JES3 initiators, the JES3 queues."

"If a unit of work ID is associated with a CICS, a DB2, and a MQ transaction, and having that capability correlate to those different technologies via one business application transaction which would be beneficial."

"The documentation format could be better. I noticed with the last release that all of the manuals were bundled into one. It used to have a separate installation guide, user guide, etc."

"The documentation, like installation guides and stuff, put it all in one place."

"We are using Datacom as the database system, so maybe a little bit more integration with that."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Pricing is a little steep, but there are a lot of other functions that it brings together. It gives you one window to look through to get to a lot of different features. The more products you have from CA, the better pricing they have, the more you can get them doing more things for you."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Logistics Company

17%

Educational Organization

10%

Financial Services Firm

Marketing Services Firm

Financial Services Firm

22%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	25

Comparisons

BMC AMI Ops vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 17% of the time

IBM OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 14% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 10% of the time

CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 10% of the time

Tone Mainframe Management vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 6% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

IBM OMEGAMON vs SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

Compared 39% of the time

BMC AMI Ops vs SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

Compared 30% of the time

ASG TMON vs SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

Compared 15% of the time

Mainframe Operational Intelligence vs SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

Compared 9% of the time

More SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

January 2026

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Buyer's Guide

SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

January 2026

Download SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence product report

Also Known As

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

CA SYSVIEW Performance Management, CA SYSVIEW, Unicenter CA-SYSVIEW Realtime Performance Management

Overview

z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

Broadcom

CA SYSVIEW Performance Management offers new levels of visibility into critical business transactions that provide 24x7 monitoring for complex application environments. This real-time visibility is a critical asset to simplify mainframe performance management by monitoring against alerts, drilling down for intuitive problem identification, and basing automation on performance intelligence. Instead of using different tools, processes and people to support each environment, now there's an enterprise-wide solution that monitors the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems, providing additional integrated data.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Tieto

Tieto, Navy Federal Credit Union (NFCU)

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

December 2025

Free Report: OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

Find out what your peers are saying about OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence report.

See our list of best Mainframe Management vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.