No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IBM StoredIQ vs OpenText eDiscovery comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM StoredIQ
Ranking in eDiscovery
14th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Indexing and Search (15th)
OpenText eDiscovery
Ranking in eDiscovery
19th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of IBM StoredIQ is 2.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText eDiscovery is 2.7%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eDiscovery Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM StoredIQ2.7%
OpenText eDiscovery2.7%
Other94.6%
eDiscovery
 

Featured Reviews

GB
Delivery Manager at Gesel
Helps with GDPR compliance through data discovery and management
We knew that we have a lot of scanned docs inside our repositories, but there was a big issue where we needed to know which content was really an image. Because of the OCR made at runtime during the scan, now we know exactly the data we have. When you have zipped documents the scan will unzip them and find the data inside.
Use OpenText eDiscovery?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
886,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

J.B. Hunt Transport, BBVA Compass
Serious Fraud Office, Sidley Austin, Phillips Lytle, Ashurst and Integreon, Leading Law Firm, Gray Plant Mooty, Stinson Leonard Street, Drinker Biddle and Reath, Hire Counsel, Pillsbury Law,
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Commvault and others in eDiscovery. Updated: March 2026.
886,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.