We performed a comparison between IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and NTT-AT WinActor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)."It is easy to use. We have enabled our resources who don't have a background in automation to be certified and trained, then implement this product within a very short period of time, as it is very user-friendly."
"The solution’s performance is good."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"IBM Robotic Process Automation has greatly improved the organization by improving the speed of performance, as the speed of the robot is estimated to be 20 times faster than the human being."
"It's not inclusive, in terms of automation, you can just do it standalone, in its own silo. It's not going to force your existing system or teams, your admin teams, to create new IDs for you or even force them to create new services or APIs for you or expose something from there. They can just keep the way they are doing it right now, but you still automate it."
"The solution's ease of use is its most valuable aspect."
"It is a good tool for automation."
"I like the integration with Watson and the possibility to have an intelligent reading of all the customers' documents."
"The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."
"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."
"We would like a decreased need for customer support."
"Needs better integration with artificial intelligence or with machine-learning."
"We are looking to see how it can connect with various interfaces seamlessly, through APIs."
"Stability could be better."
"We would like more focus on understanding AI and how it can be used to manage exception handling."
"IBM’s support should improve response time."
"One of the things I would definitely like to see is more of the machine-learning and cognitive capabilities. For example, now that we're starting to automate more and more tasks, there are some things that still require us to go back and modify the robots when we need to. But if we had more of the machine-learning integrated into it, I believe it would be easier to maintain, so that we wouldn't have to go back and adjust every time."
"Capturing GUI operations is very easy, but capturing IBM Logistics automation is hard. It does not always work with browsers or automotive applications like SAP."
"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."
"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."
More IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is ranked 8th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 23 reviews while NTT-AT WinActor is ranked 27th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 2 reviews. IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is rated 8.2, while NTT-AT WinActor is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) writes "User-friendly interface and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NTT-AT WinActor writes "Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked". IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism and IPsoft 1RPA, whereas NTT-AT WinActor is most compared with UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.