We performed a comparison between IBM Case Foundation and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."
"Case Foundation provides a strong security boost."
"It provides us the capability of producing business processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository."
"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."
"The solution is scalable."
"The content management is great."
"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."
"It's very easy."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"The cloud version could use more stability."
"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."
"The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications."
"IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM."
"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."
"Once a workflow is launched then it stays static forever, which is a problem because if there is a change in the business then you cannot change the workflow."
"There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
IBM Case Foundation is ranked 27th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Streamlined business process automation with user-friendly design". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, Pega BPM and Camunda. See our IBM Case Foundation vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
