We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Initially, the process architecture studio was very helpful and it was compliant with BPMN standards."
"Setting it up is fairly easy. If somebody has knowledge of the system, he or she will be able to do it fairly quickly."
"IBM BPM is a stable solution."
"IBM BPM and Automation Anywhere working together automate manual tasks with a reduction in FTEs, creating about a 30% reduction in FTEs by automating processes."
"This is one of the best tools to support the business and the way we work, and the numerous processes we need to implement."
"The solution is stable."
"Overall, I'm satisfied with the product. If you compare it with other products, it's probably not as easygoing or as simple to implement as the rest. But after you get used to it, it works. It has a lot of capabilities and potential, but the people, who come from different technologies, have some difficulty getting used to the way of working with IBM products."
"IBM BPM's most valuable features are its speed in implementing and providing any changes."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"The engine itself tends to accumulate a lot of data that needs to be cleaned up, and that's the kind of thing that keeps it from, in some scenarios, scaling as much as it needs to. And then, when you're building solutions, if you're not careful to keep the screens from being associated with too much data, if you're going to just do things the way that a lot of people would just assume that they can do, without having experience of having made those mistakes before, it will accumulate a lot of data, and that will cause it to perform very badly."
"IBM BPM can improve the dashboards and reports. It only has two dashboards, and reporting is very difficult to build."
"I have an interest around the robotic piece, and integrating that with the processes. I think that is certainly a good direction to be going."
"They don't have a mechanism to achieve processes, data sources, and data."
"The interface is limited and should improve in the future."
"You must have good experience to work with it. It is not that easy. Its installation is complex, especially in the new version for business automation, and it could be improved. It has a safety application embedded inside it, and you need to do a lot of configuration to install it. I have been working for two days to resolve an issue."
"We have been experiencing bad performance and instability."
"User Interface components could be further refined to enhance and extend customizations dictated by end clients."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, Camunda and Pega BPM. See our IBM BPM vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.