OpenText Functional Testing and SmartBear TestComplete compete in the functional testing tools category. OpenText Functional Testing has the upper hand with a more extensive feature set, although it is priced higher.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers advanced object identification, seamless application integration, and robust AI capabilities, enhancing automation efficiency for a variety of applications. SmartBear TestComplete is recognized for its ease of use, providing effective script recording and a strong object spy feature.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing needs better browser support and modern programming language options. Users also note integration and performance issues with desktop applications. SmartBear TestComplete could improve mobile testing support and cross-browser compatibility and streamline reporting for large-scale integration scenarios.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing is primarily deployed on-premises with strong integration capabilities but lacks public cloud flexibility. Customer service receives mixed reviews with prompt but sometimes slow support for complex issues. SmartBear TestComplete provides flexible deployment options and generally reliable customer service, though some users desire faster technical support responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is priced higher, justifying its cost with reduced manual effort and a positive ROI for large-scale enterprises. SmartBear TestComplete offers a more budget-friendly alternative with effective licensing options for varying team sizes, delivering cost-effective outcomes without sacrificing essential features.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Once set up, only one person is needed to handle all tasks, reducing the requirement for multiple personnel.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
Running them in parallel allows you to consume multiple runtime licenses and just execute the tests that don't have conflicting priorities and get through a lot of volume much quicker.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
While using SmartBear TestComplete, we are fine with the current capabilities, however, it would be beneficial to improve some performance aspects, especially the image comparison feature.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
OpenText Functional Testing has an impressive ability to connect to mobile devices and its ability to test so many different types of software, whether it be mainframe, APIs, mobile, web, or desktop.
The best features of OpenText Functional Testing include descriptive programming, the ability to add objects in the repository, and its ease of use for UI compared to other tools.
The most valuable feature of SmartBear TestComplete for me is the image comparison functionality.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 7.0% |
| SmartBear TestComplete | 5.8% |
| Other | 87.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 73 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
SmartBear TestComplete offers automation testing across desktop, web, and mobile platforms with robust object identification and cross-browser compatibility. It features seamless integration with CI tools and supports diverse tech stacks, enhancing efficiency through modular testing and data-driven capabilities.
SmartBear TestComplete is known for its Object Browser and Object Spy, providing deep inspection and interaction within applications. It supports third-party tool integration, particularly CI platforms, enhancing testing consistency through name mapping and modular testing. Despite its high pricing and need for enhancement in COM and ActiveX support and mobile testing, it offers record-and-playback features, self-healing capabilities, and cross-browser compatibility, making it a choice for regression and automation. Users leverage it for testing in environments including Windows, with exploration into a Flutter-based mobile context. Improvements are desired in object mapping, headless testing, and programming language support, while challenges exist in UI usability and virtual machine licensing.
What are the key features of SmartBear TestComplete?SmartBear TestComplete is implemented in industries requiring comprehensive testing solutions, including those performing regression and functionality testing across platforms. Its integration and behavior automation support CI/CD pipelines, while desktop, web, and mobile applications are tested for UI automation and backend database functionality, showing its adaptability to industry-specific needs.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
