HPE OneView vs ManageEngine Site24x7 comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and ManageEngine are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.5, while ManageEngine is ranked #48 with an average rating of 8.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

HPE OneView

Read 84 HPE OneView reviews

3,128 Views
2,846 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Site24x7

Read 2 ManageEngine Site24x7 reviews

1,099 Views
648 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

ManageEngine Site24x7

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE OneView and ManageEngine Site24x7 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

27th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine Site24x7

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

48th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (59th), Server Monitoring (21st), Cloud Monitoring Software (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Site24x7 is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE OneView	1.2%
ManageEngine Site24x7	0.5%
Other	98.3%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sajith Alawwa

Sr. Systems Engineer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Efficient management and upgrades streamline complex setups

My main complaint is about the blades on the frames, which seem to have a lot of problems. We often have to call HPE for replacements, such as for memory. Constant issues arise, leading to frequent replacement of blade parts. Additionally, the upgrade process is lengthy, requiring careful planning as we cannot match ESXi versions without aligning OneView first, leading to delays.

Read full review

Prashanth Magadi

Principal Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Struggled with complex licensing and limited support but have gained unified cloud monitoring

We face certain challenges with monitoring website uptime for our business operations because we don't have that 24/7 monitoring, so that's what we are working with ManageEngine on, regarding how effectively we can use that. I may not be able to give that information on how ManageEngine Site24x7 can be improved, but I felt that the monitoring or the licensing terms, such as the advanced monitors or monitors, are not very user-friendly. I feel that because I don't know how exactly we can check what devices use which license and how we can control those things; that's not user-friendly. For example, if I have to look at what all devices are utilizing my advanced monitor license or what all devices are using my basic monitor license, then if I want to pull a report or validate them, I don't have an easy option; it's too complicated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The deployment was easy, it has many features, and it is a great solution that is easy to use while providing a good inventory of your hardware and firmware."

"In 3.0, HPE has done a better job with firmware updates, added more features, and also enabled the possibility to stage updates on the iLO card."

"It improves our productivity, because we can use OneView for more than just servers."

"OneView is a really good option and it makes our life easy."

"If you have HPE compute in place today, you should definitely look at using OneView."

"In terms of switch management, it is now easy to understand the current configuration, it provides centralized management, it provides a single pane, and you can easily do all updates in one shot."

"Easy to add servers and get them monitored and manageable."

"The improvement was basically to be more efficient and have a lot of productivity, as we are more developed to creation rather than just solving problems."

More HPE OneView pros

"Site24x7 stands out. It is truly amazing."

"One of the valuable features of this site is that it operates 24/7, monitoring my entire infrastructure, uptime, and related error issues."

"The deployment was not a challenge for us, because we are just trying to connect to the cloud instance; it's SaaS-based, so we just had to route all our traffic to that particular device."

Cons

"The main problem that we run into, as far as stability goes, is when something loses its profile. Sometimes it requires jumping through a number of "hoops" to really get it back."

"I have not given it a perfect rating because some features are missing like adding other storage systems and providing email notifications."

"There is a lot of automated stuff in there, but we'd like to step into the middle of that and bring in our own different tools as a part of that integration."

"I think HPE could make more user-friendly interfaces, exclude Java and move to an HTML5 platform, make more detailed documentation, and lower the price."

"The stability of the solution is unfavorable. We have had some struggles with OneView."

"The system currently has 75,000 alerts that are either being acknowledged or some are active, and there's not a simple way of selecting a whole filtered list and then closing them off and deleting them."

"The solution could add storage, integration services, and end-to-end support for Cisco switches or other competitor products."

"I would like to see a change in the GUI, so that you can navigate easier."

More HPE OneView cons

"It is technical. The engineer must be familiar with it."

"The product is not difficult to use. That said, it is technical. The engineer must be familiar with it."

"The only complaint I would state about the technical support by ManageEngine is we don't get them on call; it's only email support that we get."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think that the price of OneView is $500 USD per server, which is a little high."

"I am happy with the price."

"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."

"Use it. It is free."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

"The solution is free to use, but if you want the management aspect you require a virtual machine such as C7000 or Synergy which require licenses."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

27%

University

12%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	51

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

The typical use case for HPE OneView addresses a shift from manual monitoring, where clients needed to log in to the server every hour. After integrating everything on HP Service Manager and HP Ope...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering HPE OneView?

Regarding the integration capabilities of HPE OneView with platforms such as VMware, SAP, or other platforms, I work for Telecom VAS servers, for SMSC, CMC, and CRB. We already have an HP team in p...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Site24x7?

This tool can handle 40 basic monitors. I can set the pole and frequency from 130 locations, configuring the IPs to provide three advanced monitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Site24x7?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Site24x7?

The primary use case is for the monitoring of our critical resources. We have probably not fully utilized the product, as we are still using the basic functionality of monitoring our servers and a ...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs HPE OneView

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 9% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs HPE OneView

Compared 6% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 6% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE OneView

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Kentik vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 19% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 11% of the time

Netdata vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 10% of the time

eG Enterprise vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 7% of the time

Centreon vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine Site24x7 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

March 2026

Download HPE OneView product report

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

March 2026

Download ManageEngine Site24x7 product report

Also Known As

HP OneView

No data available

Overview

HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.

HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

ManageEngine Site24x7 is a comprehensive monitoring platform that aids businesses in tracking application and website performance, network activity, and server health, ensuring seamless IT operations.

Known for delivering deep insights, ManageEngine Site24x7 provides businesses with the tools necessary to maintain robust digital infrastructure. It supports monitoring of application performance, uptime, server health, and network traffic. Its cloud-based solution is suitable for IT departments seeking continuous visibility and control over their digital assets. Offering detailed analytics, it enhances decision-making by rapidly identifying potential issues before they affect business operations.

What are the key features of ManageEngine Site24x7?

Application Performance Monitoring: Tracks and optimizes application services for improved functionality.
Website Monitoring: Monitors uptime and response time to ensure web presence is uninterrupted.
Network Monitoring: Provides insights into network traffic and performance for comprehensive oversight.
Server Monitoring: Analyzes server status and resource consumption, promoting optimal performance.
Cloud Monitoring: Supports multiple cloud providers, offering a unified view of cloud services.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from ManageEngine Site24x7?

Improved Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring to reduce downtime and enhance productivity.
Cost Savings: Detects issues early to minimize repair costs and resource wastage.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides thorough insights into IT infrastructure for proactive management.
Scalability: Adapts to dynamic IT environments, making it suitable for growing businesses.

ManageEngine Site24x7 is implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. It provides solutions tailored to specific needs, ensuring critical IT systems perform reliably. Organizations benefit from its ability to monitor and report on industry-specific applications and regulatory compliance requirements.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.