HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] vs VMware Live Recovery comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Broadcom are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

HPE GreenLake for Disaster ...

Read 3 HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Read 82 VMware Live Recovery reviews

6,951 Views
1,112 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

HPE GreenLake for Disaster ...

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 12, 2025

VMware Live Recovery and HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] compete as disaster recovery solutions, each offering unique benefits. HPE GreenLake is seen as superior due to its comprehensive features and elasticity, which justify its investment value.

Features: VMware Live Recovery includes robust virtual machine backup, quick recovery, and seamless integration with VMware environments. HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] provides scalable infrastructure, flexible resource allocation, and a cloud-based approach enhancing resilience and adaptability during disasters.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Live Recovery is straightforward to deploy within VMware ecosystems, benefiting from extensive documentation and reliable support. HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] has a more complex deployment due to its cloud-oriented model but offers dedicated customer service to assist during implementation.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Live Recovery generally showcases a more appealing initial setup cost, attracting cost-conscious organizations. HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] delivers higher ROI over time with scalable consumption-based billing, aligning with long-term growth and cost management strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Disaster Recovery as a Service Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery as a Service

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,932 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE GreenLake for Disaster ...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Live Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (1st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (3rd)

Featured Reviews

Wayne Cross

Director of cyber security at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Identifies additional capacity and automates onboarding

I think HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery is doing a good job overall, but there's room for improvement. It should pay more attention to different business models. As a law firm, our requirements differ greatly from those of insurance companies or banks. Our timelines and capacity recovery needs are unique. The solution should create specific verticals focused on contracts that suit our environment. The concept is great, but the execution could be better for the legal vertical. For example, when we need capacity, it usually takes too long to get it. This might be okay for banks or insurance companies, but it's too slow for a law firm. The tool needs to understand how different industries work and what drives our specific requirements.

Read full review

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

Has enabled seamless VM management and automated failover while support response needs improvement

For support issues, they help with the issue, but it takes a very long time. The reason is that they engage a very initial resource and then escalate to another level, and during these level escalations, our time is wasted. They do not understand the severity of the issue. They go through step-by-step and then go to the upper level. This may be their SOP, but we require instant support and instant resolution of the problem, so here VMware Live Recovery is lacking. They follow their SOP, but they initially engage very low-level personnel who are not able to answer or resolve the issue, so they escalate or take a very long time to resolve the issue. The main issue is to improve the approach of resolving solutions. I may not be able to suggest new features because in these recent months, I have not been very close to it as we are exploring different solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are simplicity and that recovery can take a few seconds."

"I now have one portal where I can manage my servers, my storage, my networking, and also my data protection and disaster recovery. It is now all integrated into one portal."

"The most valuable feature of HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery for us is its ability to identify when we need additional capacity and automate onboarding. Our law firm's data needs can be unpredictable, so the tool's management of long-term data capacity strategies is crucial. They monitor when we reach around 80 percent capacity and ensure that additional capacity is provided within the required time frame, which is important for us."

"With VMware vSphere Replication and SRM combined, we were able to cut down outage windows to a maximum of one hour."

"VMware Live Recovery is a very useful tool for live recovery."

"VMware SRM is very effective between two sites with identical twin storage, you can have synchronization between the two sites."

"It's very reliable. The solution is stable."

"Very good - we have a DR platform that we've tested with a live production workflow."

"This disaster recovery solution helps our clients with their mission-critical projects, allowing them to maintain business continuity and increase the reliability of their services."

"It's easy to use and the interface is quite simple."

"The stability of SRM has been excellent. It gets a nine-out-of-ten."

More VMware Live Recovery pros

Cons

"I would like to have the ability to deploy the appliances and protect some VMs on the cloud."

"In HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery, until now, if I remember well, there is only VMware to VMware. Recently, they added Azure, but it does not have the full flexibility yet for it to go from anywhere to anywhere. There is room for improvement."

"I think HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery is doing a good job overall, but there's room for improvement. It should pay more attention to different business models. As a law firm, our requirements differ greatly from those of insurance companies or banks. Our timelines and capacity recovery needs are unique."

"Currently, there is a limitation of consolidating only 15 sites per SRM."

"The two vCenters have to be synchronized, which sometimes gives us problems because Keberos does not tolerate more than five minutes in time difference."

"There is room for improvement in the automation and orchestration aspects of this solution."

"Not really for use and operation, but a version upgrade is a real problem."

"You need a lot of knowledge to work with the interface because it is not really easy to use, and it would be great if the dashboard were simplified."

"SRM may hit some OS issues related to IP changes, but they are usually OS related, especially in the 2008 realm."

"I would like to see this solution be more scalable."

"Technical support needs improvement, they are not very responsive."

More VMware Live Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is straightforward. The thresholds are well documented, so you know exactly where your tiers are. The price is very clear if you decide to go for a certain capacity. The pricing is also clear if you want to move to the next threshold. So that aspect is very straightforward and not an issue."

"It is not cheap, but it is much more cost-efficient compared to Zerto because the entry point of the number of VMs to be protected is lower compared to Zerto. It is more interesting to get started with GreenLake for Disaster Recovery because of the lower entry price point."

"It is about $3,000 a year for the 25 pack. The package gives you the ability to protect up to 25 virtual machines."

"SRM is reasonably priced for the functionality it provides."

"It is an expensive platform. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."

"The price of VMware SRM depends on how many VMs the customer has to move. There is a difference between the standard and enterprise license. I'm presenting the standard license to my customers because the total of VMs is not more than 50. The customer needs only the standard license and the cost is very effective for him."

"It is reasonably priced, and its cost hasn't been a significant factor in our implementation."

"There is an annual license to use this solution."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for VMware SRM, which is not very expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight to nine out of ten."

More VMware Live Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,932 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery?

It is not cheap, but it is much more cost-efficient compared to Zerto because the entry point of the number of VMs to be protected is lower compared to Zerto. It is more interesting to get started ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery?

It satisfies my needs because I am using VMware to VMware. It is using Zerto technology in the backend, and knowing that with Zerto, you can go from any cloud to any cloud or on-premises VMware. Yo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery?

I use it for disaster recovery needs. I have a main data center and then another disaster recovery site, which is technically one server to protect my mission-critical VMs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We have been using VMware Live Recovery since 2015, and most of our effort relies on it. I personally feel that it is very easy to use, easy to manage, and provides many features compared to other ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We are the partner as well as the integrator, and we mostly work in the integration industry. Integration is our core business, but we also do partnership activities. Most of our projects are based...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Site Recovery vs HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL]

Compared 59% of the time

More HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] Competitors

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 33% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 14% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 2% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL]

April 2026

HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] report

Download HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery

March 2026

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

Also Known As

No data available

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Overview

HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] provides a robust platform tailored for ensuring continuous data protection and seamless business continuity. With its reliable features, it is designed to minimize downtime and streamline recovery processes for diverse environments.

Tailored for enterprises needing efficient disaster recovery solutions, HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] integrates seamlessly into existing infrastructures. It reduces complexities associated with traditional data backup systems by offering a comprehensive approach to IT resilience. Businesses benefit from flexible scalability and enhanced data security, making it a strategic choice for maintaining business operations.

What are the key features of HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL]?

Automated Orchestration: Streamlines disaster recovery processes with automated workflows to ensure rapid response and minimal manual intervention.
Scalability: Designed to grow with enterprise needs, allowing for flexible resource allocation based on demand.
Data Compression: Enhances storage efficiency and reduces latency by compressing data for efficient transfer and storage.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for physical infrastructure, leading to significant savings in capital expenditures.
Minimal Downtime: Ensures quick recovery of services, minimizing business interruption and revenue loss.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust security features to protect data during transfer and storage, safeguarding sensitive information.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, where data integrity is critical, HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] is often implemented to ensure reliable data protection and rapid recovery. Its application extends to e-commerce and manufacturing sectors, providing flexible recovery solutions tailored to specific business demands.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

VMware Live Recovery is a disaster recovery solution that protects and recovers virtual machines (VMs) across on-premise and public clouds. Key features include rapid ransomware recovery, an on-demand recovery environment for testing procedures without affecting production, live behavioral analysis to detect threats, push-button VM network isolation to contain threats, guided restore point selection, and immutable, air-gapped recovery points to prevent tampering. VMware Live Recovery provides a comprehensive solution to safeguard critical data and applications from cyberattacks and other disasters.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery as a Service

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Microsoft, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,932 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.