Azure Site Recovery vs HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] comparison

Microsoft and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Azure Site Recovery

Read 26 Azure Site Recovery reviews

2,265 Views
815 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

HPE GreenLake for Disaster ...

Read 3 HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Azure Site Recovery

HPE GreenLake for Disaster ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 6, 2025

Azure Site Recovery and HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery EOL are competing in the disaster recovery category. Despite Azure's positive aspects in pricing and support, HPE GreenLake stands out due to its advanced features that justify the investment.

Features: Azure Site Recovery integrates seamlessly with the Azure ecosystem, facilitates effortless backup and recovery, and offers reliable disaster recovery solutions. HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery EOL provides customizable disaster recovery plans, a comprehensive monitoring dashboard, and extensive management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Site Recovery offers straightforward deployment within the Azure framework complemented by reliable support. HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery EOL requires a complex setup due to its extensive features, but it provides attentive customer service for thorough assistance throughout the process.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Site Recovery is cost-effective with lower initial setup investment and quicker ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery EOL comes with higher setup costs but delivers greater long-term value and enhanced ROI due to its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Disaster Recovery as a Service Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery as a Service

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (3rd)

HPE GreenLake for Disaster ...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

RituparnaBhattacharya

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global

The time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes

First of all, we initially faced a challenge as Azure Site Recovery was not supporting shared disk options on SQL clusters with VMs, which are important for a Windows cluster mode. Additionally, the setup is quite easy, only requiring the creation of a vault. Its time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes.

Read full review

Wayne Cross

Director of cyber security at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Identifies additional capacity and automates onboarding

I think HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery is doing a good job overall, but there's room for improvement. It should pay more attention to different business models. As a law firm, our requirements differ greatly from those of insurance companies or banks. Our timelines and capacity recovery needs are unique. The solution should create specific verticals focused on contracts that suit our environment. The concept is great, but the execution could be better for the legal vertical. For example, when we need capacity, it usually takes too long to get it. This might be okay for banks or insurance companies, but it's too slow for a law firm. The tool needs to understand how different industries work and what drives our specific requirements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."

"What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution."

"We use the tool for business continuity purposes."

"It’s native to Azure and does exactly what it’s designed to do—recover one site to another without creating all the VMs on that site. This helps reduce costs on the secondary site."

"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."

"It is a very stable product and very scalable."

"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."

"The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products."

More Azure Site Recovery pros

"The most valuable features are simplicity and that recovery can take a few seconds."

"The most valuable feature of HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery for us is its ability to identify when we need additional capacity and automate onboarding. Our law firm's data needs can be unpredictable, so the tool's management of long-term data capacity strategies is crucial. They monitor when we reach around 80 percent capacity and ensure that additional capacity is provided within the required time frame, which is important for us."

"I now have one portal where I can manage my servers, my storage, my networking, and also my data protection and disaster recovery. It is now all integrated into one portal."

Cons

"One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately."

"The solution needs to improve replication and failover processes. We are still looking for improvements in the cost baseline."

"The system did go down a couple of times, which impacted our operations. For stability, I would rate it a seven out of ten."

"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."

"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."

"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."

"Currently, Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options. Moreover, it does not support services like AppConfig or App Services."

"Could have more integration with other platforms."

More Azure Site Recovery cons

"I think HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery is doing a good job overall, but there's room for improvement. It should pay more attention to different business models. As a law firm, our requirements differ greatly from those of insurance companies or banks. Our timelines and capacity recovery needs are unique."

"In HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery, until now, if I remember well, there is only VMware to VMware. Recently, they added Azure, but it does not have the full flexibility yet for it to go from anywhere to anywhere. There is room for improvement."

"I would like to have the ability to deploy the appliances and protect some VMs on the cloud."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."

"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

"The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."

"Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."

"They have a license to pay."

"I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."

"It is not cheap, but it is much more cost-efficient compared to Zerto because the entry point of the number of VMs to be protected is lower compared to Zerto. It is more interesting to get started with GreenLake for Disaster Recovery because of the lower entry price point."

"Pricing is straightforward. The thresholds are well documented, so you know exactly where your tiers are. The price is very clear if you decide to go for a certain capacity. The pricing is also clear if you want to move to the next threshold. So that aspect is very straightforward and not an issue."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Site Recovery?

Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?

A major advantage is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site. It is very flexible and will save your cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?

The flexibility of Azure Site Recovery regarding integration with different IT environments is limited; it is purely an Azure platform service for business continuity, not meant for integration wit...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery?

It is not cheap, but it is much more cost-efficient compared to Zerto because the entry point of the number of VMs to be protected is lower compared to Zerto. It is more interesting to get started ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery?

It satisfies my needs because I am using VMware to VMware. It is using Zerto technology in the backend, and knowing that with Zerto, you can go from any cloud to any cloud or on-premises VMware. Yo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery?

I use it for disaster recovery needs. I have a main data center and then another disaster recovery site, which is technically one server to protect my mission-critical VMs.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 18% of the time

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 13% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 11% of the time

SEP Software vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

More Azure Site Recovery Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery

October 2025

Download Azure Site Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL]

September 2025

HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] report

Download HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] product report

Overview

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Microsoft

HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] provides a robust platform tailored for ensuring continuous data protection and seamless business continuity. With its reliable features, it is designed to minimize downtime and streamline recovery processes for diverse environments.

Tailored for enterprises needing efficient disaster recovery solutions, HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] integrates seamlessly into existing infrastructures. It reduces complexities associated with traditional data backup systems by offering a comprehensive approach to IT resilience. Businesses benefit from flexible scalability and enhanced data security, making it a strategic choice for maintaining business operations.

What are the key features of HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL]?

Automated Orchestration: Streamlines disaster recovery processes with automated workflows to ensure rapid response and minimal manual intervention.
Scalability: Designed to grow with enterprise needs, allowing for flexible resource allocation based on demand.
Data Compression: Enhances storage efficiency and reduces latency by compressing data for efficient transfer and storage.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for physical infrastructure, leading to significant savings in capital expenditures.
Minimal Downtime: Ensures quick recovery of services, minimizing business interruption and revenue loss.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust security features to protect data during transfer and storage, safeguarding sensitive information.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, where data integrity is critical, HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] is often implemented to ensure reliable data protection and rapid recovery. Its application extends to e-commerce and manufacturing sectors, providing flexible recovery solutions tailored to specific business demands.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery as a Service

September 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Commvault, Microsoft and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.