HPE BladeSystem vs Supermicro SuperBlade comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Supermicro are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Supermicro is ranked #8. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 12.9% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Supermicro’s 7.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Supermicro users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 139 HPE BladeSystem reviews

2,041 Views
2,000 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Supermicro SuperBlade

Read 4 Supermicro SuperBlade reviews

838 Views
712 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

Supermicro SuperBlade

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 31, 2025

HPE BladeSystem and Supermicro SuperBlade are two products competing in the blade server market. HPE BladeSystem holds an advantage with its cost-effectiveness and reliability, while Supermicro SuperBlade shines with superior technology and performance for intensive computing environments.

Features: HPE BladeSystem is known for its modular design, efficient energy use, and robust management capabilities, making it easy to integrate with existing infrastructures. Supermicro SuperBlade offers exceptional computational power, flexibility, and advanced technology integration, ideal for tech-heavy environments requiring high processing power and scalability.

Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem could enhance its high-performance computing capabilities, improve flexibility, and adopt more advanced technology integrations. Supermicro SuperBlade could benefit from reduced deployment complexity, optimized energy efficiency, and enhanced support systems for easier integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE BladeSystem offers straightforward deployment and comprehensive support services to ensure easy integration into enterprise systems. Supermicro SuperBlade, although sophisticated and performance-oriented, can require longer deployment times due to advanced configuration needs, but it provides detailed setup guides and responsive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem's competitive initial setup costs and quick return on investment appeal to budget-sensitive businesses. Conversely, Supermicro SuperBlade necessitates a higher initial investment but promises substantial long-term benefits through superior performance and capability, making it attractive for organizations focusing on powerful computing solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,209 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Ranking in Blade Servers

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

139

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Supermicro SuperBlade

Ranking in Blade Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE BladeSystem is 12.9%, down from 13.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Supermicro SuperBlade is 7.9%, up from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE BladeSystem	12.9%
Supermicro SuperBlade	7.9%
Other	79.2%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Reliability and reasonable pricing enhance data center management

I researched on peerspot.com about IT solutions, specifically about HPE BladeSystem and HPE Synergy, because we are already using HP servers in our state data center. In HP Cloud System, we are using a converged infrastructure to connect LAN and SAN connectivity across the network. Regarding Virtual Connect technology, there is a noticeable impact on network management. For day-to-day operations, we use various applications such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams to connect virtually. Using HPE BladeSystem Virtual Connect technology in HP Cloud System, we achieve efficient network management with well-defined LAN and SAN connectivity. We already have a defined modular architecture in place designed by the HP team for our data center. My company name is National Institute for Smart Government, also called NISG, under the National e-Governance Division. My title is Technology Management Consultant. I would rate HPE BladeSystem as an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Gergely Lakos

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

With many servers in one, these blade servers are easier to manage

The service could be improved by faster servers, more widely available VMs, and more storage in one place. Then, in the event of a blade failure, we could start our VMs on another blade in a couple of minutes. This is why we wanted to buy storage. But now, we want to buy a twin server with 24 VMware discs to create test storage. The next product release should allow more servers to be controlled simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs."

"The density of the BladeSystem, that we can keep adding blades as we need more VMs."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its high availability."

"The most valuable feature of HPE BladeSystem is its upgradability and centralized configuration."

"The feature I find most valuable is the ease of use."

"The solution has good scalability."

"The solution is issue-free and works almost flawlessly."

"Modularity is a key feature that provides energy saving ."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The ability to save resource is a key feature."

"I think the IPMI is a really good feature."

Cons

"HPE BladeSystem could improve the communication between the server and the storage."

"The solution could improve by having more automation, such as the automatic mapping feature that is available in the Synergy Blade series."

"The management side of this solution could be improved."

"They should provide open learning materials and seminars for detailed knowledge of the product."

"There could be more management capability to work with integrations."

"Really look at it closely, but really look at the Synergy product as well. That seems to me like that's the next evolution of the BladeSystem."

"Higher bandwidth interconnects could be introduced."

"Currently, in the case of a disk failure there is a need to remove the whole bay and as a result, to disconnect all the other disks."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"Supermicro blade servers are not the best. They could improve in scalability but are not really scalable right now."

"There is a lack of support for fiber channels currently that needs to be added."

"The solution does not scale well."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."

"I need to pay for the license, and it is expensive. We make yearly payments."

"There is a one-time purchase for the HPE BladeSystem."

"The pricing is competitive."

"We have an annual license."

"We have been satisfied with the price. However, there are additional costs for support."

"Regarding the cost, HPE BladeSystem is not cheap. The solution and its support are costly, and there are challenges with renewal and pricing, especially in Nigeria, due to the dollar rate and FX issues. However, it is reliable. I don't have specific figures for licensing costs, as the procurement and finance departments handle them."

"I would recommend this solution for large enterprises. Medium-sized companies would find it difficult to afford the HPE BladeSystem's overall capital expenses."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

"The product is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	103

No data available

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?

The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 59% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Superdome X vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 5% of the time

Dell PowerEdge C- Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 24% of the time

NEC Sigmablade-H vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 11% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 9% of the time

HPE Integrity vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 9% of the time

More Supermicro SuperBlade Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

October 2025

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

October 2025

Download Supermicro SuperBlade product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

SuperBlade

Overview

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Supermicro SuperBlade delivers innovative computing performance and efficiency, perfect for data-intensive tasks. With its modular design, it optimizes space and power, providing a flexible and scalable infrastructure for demanding business workloads.

Supermicro SuperBlade is specifically engineered for modern data centers needing high-density computing. It offers a compact, modular architecture that simplifies system management and enhances agility. It integrates seamlessly with cloud and virtualization technologies, supporting diverse applications and workloads. Its design focuses on reducing operational costs while achieving peak performance. Users appreciate its balance of power efficiency and high computing capacity.

What are the key features of Supermicro SuperBlade?

High-Density Design: Packs multiple servers in a small form to maximize computing power per square foot.
Scalability: Easily expand or modify with modular components to adapt to growing demands.
Efficient Cooling: Advanced cooling systems ensure optimal performance and energy efficiency.
Built-In Management: Integrated management tools for streamlined operations and monitoring.
Green Computing: Focuses on energy savings for cost-effective and ecological operation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Supermicro SuperBlade?

Cost Savings: Reduces energy and operational expenses with its efficient design.
Improved Performance: Delivers exceptional processing power for faster task execution.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes IT resource utilization and efficiency.
Ease of Management: Simplifies management processes, reducing administrative overhead.
Future-Proofing: Provides flexible expansion options to accommodate future growth.

Supermicro SuperBlade is widely implemented in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and research where high computational power and storage are critical. In finance, it's used for real-time analytics and transactions. Healthcare facilities use it for patient data analysis and complex simulations, while research institutions leverage SuperBlade for simulations and data-intensive research tasks. Its adaptability allows enterprises to efficiently meet technical requirements unique to each industry.

Supermicro

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Prace

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

September 2025

Free Report: HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.