HPE BladeSystem vs Supermicro SuperBlade comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Supermicro are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Supermicro is ranked #9. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 13.9% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Supermicro’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Supermicro users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 139 HPE BladeSystem reviews

1,881 Views
1,175 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Supermicro SuperBlade

Read 4 Supermicro SuperBlade reviews

705 Views
545 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

Supermicro SuperBlade

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 25, 2025

HPE BladeSystem and Supermicro SuperBlade compete within the server infrastructure market. Supermicro SuperBlade holds an advantage in advanced features, while HPE BladeSystem shines in customer support and competitive pricing.

Features: HPE BladeSystem offers versatility, integration capabilities, and powerful virtualization features. Supermicro SuperBlade features a comprehensive modular design, high-density computing, and advanced scalability.

Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem could enhance its modularity and expandability options and improve its web management interface. Supermicro SuperBlade can work on simplifying deployment, reducing initial costs, and streamlining configuration options for easier use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE BladeSystem provides streamlined deployment processes and robust support. Supermicro SuperBlade, while requiring more technical adjustments during deployment, offers responsive customer service to address these challenges.

Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem is a budget-friendly choice with a reasonable ROI. In contrast, Supermicro SuperBlade demands a higher upfront investment but promises significant ROI through enhanced computing capacity.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,687 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Ranking in Blade Servers

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

139

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Supermicro SuperBlade

Ranking in Blade Servers

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE BladeSystem is 13.9%, down from 15.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Supermicro SuperBlade is 6.2%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Fatai Akinwande

Specialist Datacenter and Server at IHS Towers

Enables you to manage all resources from a single dashboard using the OneView feature

In terms of improvements, I'd suggest enhancing the stability of the HPE BladeSystem, especially regarding network connectivity. We once had an issue where a system didn’t communicate with the network, and it took a while to diagnose the problem. Eventually, we discovered it was a motherboard issue, but we initially thought it was the network card. Improving the onboard administratordashboard to provide more granular insights, like clearly identifying faultycomponents, would make troubleshooting much more efficient. Aside from that, the system is superb and has been reliable.

Read full review

Gergely Lakos

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

With many servers in one, these blade servers are easier to manage

The service could be improved by faster servers, more widely available VMs, and more storage in one place. Then, in the event of a blade failure, we could start our VMs on another blade in a couple of minutes. This is why we wanted to buy storage. But now, we want to buy a twin server with 24 VMware discs to create test storage. The next product release should allow more servers to be controlled simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature I find most valuable is the ease of use."

"I have noticed that the solution does provide a very good ROI for companies."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ease of management with the hardware."

"Currently, we're using HPE BladeSystem BL460, but we're planning to migrate to the Synergy System as part of our strategy since the OEM support for the BL460 will eventually end. The most valuable features are its high computing capability and availability. Additionally, the ability to manage all resources from a single dashboard using the OneView solution that comes with the HP Converge system is incredibly beneficial. The efficientand unique environment makes it an excellent fit for our needs."

"HPE BladeSystem is very easy to use."

"The solution has high performance."

"The monitoring and support HP provides is far better compared to other systems, and if we are using HP servers along with HP tools such as HP Service Manager and HP OpenView for integrating server management and automating incident management systems, it is quite helpful and the best in the market currently."

"The feature I find most valuable is the ease of use."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The ability to save resource is a key feature."

"I think the IPMI is a really good feature."

Cons

"This product needs a wider range of firmware compatibility matrix from the oldest to the newest blade server."

"BladeSystem is an old-fashioned server and not very well developed for new features and new areas of data centers, which is not very good for enterprise companies."

"The connectivity speed could be improved."

"HPE BladeSystem can improve proactive monitoring."

"They are not selling BladeSystem anymore. The end of the sale of this platform was this year, 2020."

"I would prefer to have changes in the compatibility of the blade servers with the new ones designed by HPE, as the top team's version does not have it."

"Storage capacity could be enhanced."

"HPE BladeSystems is an old technology that cannot fit all of the dynamic organizational needs of our company."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"There is a lack of support for fiber channels currently that needs to be added."

"Supermicro blade servers are not the best. They could improve in scalability but are not really scalable right now."

"The solution does not scale well."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I need to pay for the license, and it is expensive. We make yearly payments."

"The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."

"The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."

"it would make everyone happy if the solution were less expensive."

"The product’s price is high compared to one of its competitors."

"It is expensive. There are no additional costs. We are able to get good discounts anyway from HPE, but if the price can come down, we'll be happy."

"I would recommend this solution for large enterprises. Medium-sized companies would find it difficult to afford the HPE BladeSystem's overall capital expenses."

"Regarding the cost, HPE BladeSystem is not cheap. The solution and its support are costly, and there are challenges with renewal and pricing, especially in Nigeria, due to the dollar rate and FX issues. However, it is reliable. I don't have specific figures for licensing costs, as the procurement and finance departments handle them."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

"The product is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?

The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 61% of the time

Dell PowerEdge M vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 9% of the time

HPE Superdome X vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 7% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

Dell PowerEdge M vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 18% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 15% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 14% of the time

More Supermicro SuperBlade Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

June 2025

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

May 2025

Download Supermicro SuperBlade product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

SuperBlade

Overview

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Supermicro SuperBlade delivers innovative computing performance and efficiency, perfect for data-intensive tasks. With its modular design, it optimizes space and power, providing a flexible and scalable infrastructure for demanding business workloads.

Supermicro SuperBlade is specifically engineered for modern data centers needing high-density computing. It offers a compact, modular architecture that simplifies system management and enhances agility. It integrates seamlessly with cloud and virtualization technologies, supporting diverse applications and workloads. Its design focuses on reducing operational costs while achieving peak performance. Users appreciate its balance of power efficiency and high computing capacity.

What are the key features of Supermicro SuperBlade?

High-Density Design: Packs multiple servers in a small form to maximize computing power per square foot.
Scalability: Easily expand or modify with modular components to adapt to growing demands.
Efficient Cooling: Advanced cooling systems ensure optimal performance and energy efficiency.
Built-In Management: Integrated management tools for streamlined operations and monitoring.
Green Computing: Focuses on energy savings for cost-effective and ecological operation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Supermicro SuperBlade?

Cost Savings: Reduces energy and operational expenses with its efficient design.
Improved Performance: Delivers exceptional processing power for faster task execution.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes IT resource utilization and efficiency.
Ease of Management: Simplifies management processes, reducing administrative overhead.
Future-Proofing: Provides flexible expansion options to accommodate future growth.

Supermicro SuperBlade is widely implemented in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and research where high computational power and storage are critical. In finance, it's used for real-time analytics and transactions. Healthcare facilities use it for patient data analysis and complex simulations, while research institutions leverage SuperBlade for simulations and data-intensive research tasks. Its adaptability allows enterprises to efficiently meet technical requirements unique to each industry.

Supermicro

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Prace

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

June 2025

Free Report: HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.