Cisco UCS B-Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade comparison

Cisco and Supermicro are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4, while Supermicro is ranked #8. Cisco holds a 7.3% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Supermicro’s 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Supermicro users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS B-Series

Read 74 Cisco UCS B-Series reviews

1,089 Views
1,056 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Supermicro SuperBlade

Read 4 Supermicro SuperBlade reviews

825 Views
693 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS B-Series

Supermicro SuperBlade

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 31, 2025

Supermicro SuperBlade and Cisco UCS B-Series compete in the blade server market. Cisco UCS B-Series seems to have the upper hand due to advanced management features and scalability, although Supermicro SuperBlade is favored for its pricing and support.

Features: Supermicro SuperBlade is notable for its high-density design, customizable configurations, and efficient power usage. Cisco UCS B-Series offers integrated management capabilities, scalable architecture, and robust performance.

Room for Improvement: Supermicro SuperBlade could enhance its integrated management features, scalability options, and improve its performance metrics. Cisco UCS B-Series may benefit from simplifying its complex interface, further reducing initial costs, and shortening deployment times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Supermicro SuperBlade provides flexible deployment and personalized customer support tailored to individual needs. Cisco UCS B-Series ensures streamlined deployment through its cohesive management suite, affording quicker setup and management processes.

Pricing and ROI: Supermicro SuperBlade is appreciated for lower initial costs and favorable ROI, aligning with budget-conscious users. Cisco UCS B-Series, with higher initial setup costs, offers substantial value over time through advanced features and reliable long-term operation.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS B-Series

Ranking in Blade Servers

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Supermicro SuperBlade

Ranking in Blade Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS B-Series is 7.3%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Supermicro SuperBlade is 7.6%, up from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS B-Series	7.3%
Supermicro SuperBlade	7.6%
Other	85.1%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

DavidMbugua

Group General Manager-ICT at SkyLink

Reliable product with efficient automation capabilities

Cisco UCS B-Series manages various processes, including handling payments for over 650,000 growers, running group financials, managing human resources, and operating our main ERP system, SAP. The servers' resilience was particularly impactful. Even during power outages, the servers resumed operations from the last saved point without human intervention. The enhanced processing speed also allowed us to complete tasks that took two days in just one hour. The automation capabilities enhanced efficiency and facilitated integration with our networking components, particularly since we also used Cisco switches. The servers' security was reliable, and formal training on Cisco products made management easier. I rate the product an eight.

Read full review

Gergely Lakos

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

With many servers in one, these blade servers are easier to manage

The service could be improved by faster servers, more widely available VMs, and more storage in one place. Then, in the event of a blade failure, we could start our VMs on another blade in a couple of minutes. This is why we wanted to buy storage. But now, we want to buy a twin server with 24 VMware discs to create test storage. The next product release should allow more servers to be controlled simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution are stability and security."

"The Cisco solution provides a unified dashboard which enhances virtualization tasks, allowing configurations from a single interface. It also helps with space and power management, which are vital for data center efficiency."

"The scalability and easy management of the lifecycle, upgrades, and hardware failures are valuable."

"I like that the hardware is separated from the software definition of the components."

"The solution is stable...The solution is scalable."

"Great security and functionality."

"The initial setup is simple, and not very complex."

"The product is easy to use."

More Cisco UCS B-Series pros

"The ability to save resource is a key feature."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"I think the IPMI is a really good feature."

Cons

"The integration is an area where Cisco UCS B-Series needs to provide users with more details."

"It is more expensive than the competitors."

"The main issue with this solution is that it is quite vendor-restricted, meaning that when we use third party software, we cannot use all of the available configuration tools or pre-validated design features."

"The initial setup process is complex."

"Compared to the deployment of servers such as Dell XCDs, the deployment of UCS servers is more complex. They take longer to deploy."

"The configuration is a little bit complicated and could be made simpler."

"Cisco could improve the user-friendliness for less experienced users."

"It needs a better UI. Cisco makes a great product, but doesn't know how to make a UI."

More Cisco UCS B-Series cons

"There is a lack of support for fiber channels currently that needs to be added."

"Supermicro blade servers are not the best. They could improve in scalability but are not really scalable right now."

"The solution does not scale well."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to the more in-demand hyper-converged environments such as Nutanix or DVX rail, Cisco UCS B-Series is even more costly due to the expensive fabric interconnects."

"It makes much more sense for individual licenses for distributed environments"

"The product is expensive."

"It is expensive."

"The type of service level purchase will determine the level of support response that you receive from Cisco."

"Pricing will be based on your requirements so it is important to plan, engage, and negotiate directly with the Cisco Account Manager."

"The pricing for Cisco is less than for the HP Proliant series."

"Considering our market, I rate the pricing of Cisco UCS B-Series as a six."

More Cisco UCS B-Series pricing and cost advice

"The product is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	41

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS B-Series?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easily scalable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS B-Series?

Comparing Cisco UCS B-Series with traditional servers, while its initial cost may be slightly higher, it is not as expensive as Oracle Exadata, making it a worthwhile investment. It pays off in the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS B-Series?

There is a need for Cisco UCS B-Series to evolve and scale vertically, particularly with the increasing data demands and the integration of AI, ensuring the solution remains certified and capable u...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 32% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 17% of the time

HPE BladeSystem vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 13% of the time

HPE NonStop vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 7% of the time

More Cisco UCS B-Series Competitors

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 24% of the time

NEC Sigmablade-H vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 18% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 9% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 9% of the time

HPE Integrity vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 9% of the time

More Supermicro SuperBlade Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series

October 2025

Download Cisco UCS B-Series product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

October 2025

Download Supermicro SuperBlade product report

Also Known As

UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series

SuperBlade

Overview

Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.

Cisco

Supermicro SuperBlade delivers innovative computing performance and efficiency, perfect for data-intensive tasks. With its modular design, it optimizes space and power, providing a flexible and scalable infrastructure for demanding business workloads.

Supermicro SuperBlade is specifically engineered for modern data centers needing high-density computing. It offers a compact, modular architecture that simplifies system management and enhances agility. It integrates seamlessly with cloud and virtualization technologies, supporting diverse applications and workloads. Its design focuses on reducing operational costs while achieving peak performance. Users appreciate its balance of power efficiency and high computing capacity.

What are the key features of Supermicro SuperBlade?

High-Density Design: Packs multiple servers in a small form to maximize computing power per square foot.
Scalability: Easily expand or modify with modular components to adapt to growing demands.
Efficient Cooling: Advanced cooling systems ensure optimal performance and energy efficiency.
Built-In Management: Integrated management tools for streamlined operations and monitoring.
Green Computing: Focuses on energy savings for cost-effective and ecological operation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Supermicro SuperBlade?

Cost Savings: Reduces energy and operational expenses with its efficient design.
Improved Performance: Delivers exceptional processing power for faster task execution.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes IT resource utilization and efficiency.
Ease of Management: Simplifies management processes, reducing administrative overhead.
Future-Proofing: Provides flexible expansion options to accommodate future growth.

Supermicro SuperBlade is widely implemented in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and research where high computational power and storage are critical. In finance, it's used for real-time analytics and transactions. Healthcare facilities use it for patient data analysis and complex simulations, while research institutions leverage SuperBlade for simulations and data-intensive research tasks. Its adaptability allows enterprises to efficiently meet technical requirements unique to each industry.

Supermicro

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots

Prace

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

September 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.