HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs Qumulo comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Qumulo are both solutions in the NAS category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.8, while Qumulo is ranked #13. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.1% mindshare in N, compared to Qumulo’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qumulo users who would recommend it.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Read 304 HPE 3PAR StoreServ reviews

12,432 Views
3,108 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Qumulo

Read 8 Qumulo reviews

3,879 Views
1,862 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Qumulo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

HPE 3PAR StoreServ and Qumulo compete in the data storage market. Despite HPE 3PAR StoreServ’s lower price, Qumulo often gains favor due to its advanced features.

Features: HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers scalable architecture, effective data deduplication, and reliable support, suiting high-demand environments. Qumulo provides strong data analytics, real-time visibility, and seamless cloud integration. The main distinction is Qumulo’s focus on analytics compared to HPE’s emphasis on scalability.

Room for Improvement: HPE 3PAR StoreServ could enhance its deployment complexity and expand cloud integration options. Some users suggest improvements in user interface design and licensing flexibility. Qumulo can improve its customer support responsiveness, offer more competitive pricing, and enhance robustness in non-standard storage environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qumulo offers seamless cloud integration and responsive support, making deployment straightforward. HPE 3PAR StoreServ, while traditional and complex, is reliable with strong customer service. The choice is between Qumulo’s ease and adaptability versus HPE’s stable service.

Pricing and ROI: HPE 3PAR StoreServ is attractive for its lower initial setup costs and stable long-term ROI. Qumulo’s higher upfront costs are justified by efficiency gains and advanced data features, offering higher ROI for those prioritizing advanced data solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Qumulo Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Qumulo

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Ranking in NAS

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

304

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (2nd), All-Flash Storage (11th)

Qumulo

Ranking in NAS

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File and Object Storage (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is 4.1%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qumulo is 4.8%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE 3PAR StoreServ	4.1%
Qumulo	4.8%
Other	91.1%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Cyril Omatsola

Information Systems & Security Administrator at a government with 501-1,000 employees

Ease of use in data center boosts resilience and infrastructure efficiency

I find the HPE 3PAR StoreServ valuable for its ease of use and resilience, which is beneficial. The main benefits I have seen from having HPE 3PAR StoreServ include its use at a small branch I managed for about three years with around 60 users. It operates effectively because it is an HPE product we use there. I have not experienced any significant issues besides occasional IT-related ones, such as local database problems. Since handing over the administration of the system to someone else and moving to another department, there have not been any issues. There are many features that exist but I haven't needed to try. Before moving out of that role in my organization, I knew it was a product I enjoyed working with for infrastructure purposes. After completing my new role, I intend to return to infrastructure.

Read full review

VinceVitro

Senior Storage Architect at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Useful data sharing, simple cluster scaling, and excellent support

One aspect of Qumulo that I hoped to see improved was its software upgrade process, which did see significant progress during my usage. Initially, upgrading the software resulted in several minutes of system downtime. However, by the time I departed last summer, the downtime had reduced to mere ten seconds. Although I am unsure if Qumulo has yet achieved a completely outage-free upgrade, I simply performed the upgrades early in the morning before the marketing department began its workday, so any downtime was inconsequential.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution has given us improved application uptime and performance."

"When you need fast storage, high capacity, and deduplication, it's a good solution."

"I think the service during post-implementation, and not just pre-implementation, is the most valuable feature."

"We deployed 3PAR in the national and international markets. It's not bad, the solution."

"The compression features are good."

"With the support that our organization has, I can talk to someone right away if I have an issue. It has been very good."

"The all-flash positions our organization for growth; if somebody comes to us who needs an application with performance, we have that already formulated."

"The reason why we chose 3PAR is because it was future proof, with features like thin provisioning, very fast movement of blocks so we can put the hot data where it should be, a really powerful tool to measure data performance and bottlenecks, and no need for spare disks so we could use all the space."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pros

"The data protection algorithm to protect the data between the nodes has been the most valuable feature."

"The ratio of total operational cost to complexity versus feature set is very good."

"The feature that I like most is the analytics part of the file system."

"The data protection algorithm to protect the data between the nodes has been the most valuable feature. The integration with backup platforms such as Veeam and Veritas has also been valuable."

"The most valuable features of Qumulo are its rolling updates and all-day availability."

"The most valuable feature is real-time analytics."

"The most valuable feature of Qumulo is the ability to share files and reliability."

More Qumulo pros

Cons

"I want artificial intelligence. I don't want anybody from my team to touch it anymore. I want the AI to do everything."

"Two years ago it was 9/10. Now, perhaps it's 7/10."

"We have about 1.2 petabytes of storage sitting on the 3PARs at the moment replicated; we'd really like to get into data compression and deduplication on those devices, but at this stage we can do that only on the SSD in the environment and not on the remaining storage."

"The configuration and flexibility should improve."

"HPE 3PAR StoreServ should increase the storage capacity."

"I'd really it to be able to interact with older 3PAR storage, and possibly even non-HPE. I would like to be able to pull stuff off of old things and bring it up to the standard that has been set, simply, quickly, and efficiently. That would be a really nice feature. Right now it is a big pain. It seems to work but we tend to get some latency behind."

"We have had a few issues with it. We had our virtual environment lock up a few times on storage-based things. We think we have it sorted out, but maybe it came down to a configuration issue on it."

"Security is a mandatory feature because our customer needs to protect delicate information."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ cons

"In the next release, I would like to see the ability to have more control at a terminal level of the file system."

"The price of the software is a bit expensive, so a reduction in cost would make it more competitive."

"Qumulo should continue to expand automation and orchestration capabilities."

"One aspect of Qumulo that I hoped to see improved was its software upgrade process, which did see significant progress during my usage. Initially, upgrading the software resulted in several minutes of system downtime. However, by the time I departed last summer, the downtime had reduced to mere ten seconds. Although I am unsure if Qumulo has yet achieved a completely outage-free upgrade, I simply performed the upgrades early in the morning before the marketing department began its workday, so any downtime was inconsequential."

"Qumulo should continue to expand automation and orchestration capabilities."

"The support for iMac and protocols should be improved, not all features are available."

"The solution could improve availability and improve data protection or data services such as compression of deduplication. In a future release, we'd like to have more cloud API integrations."

"There is plenty of room for improvement. In the future, I would like to see non-disruptive updates."

More Qumulo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"3PAR was quite a bit less money than EMC, and that was one of the deciding factors."

"The solution has two parts: software and hardware, and you need to buy licenses for some features."

"Performance is at least two times, if not three times, what we had previously."

"We don't pay for any licensing fees."

"The price of the solution could be reduced for the license and for support."

"Nowadays, from a storage point of view, there are so many vendors in the market. So cost is one of the factors that pushed us to go with HPE 3PAR. Cost-wise they're pretty competitive."

"We purchased the solution as CapEx and we only pay support now. I find the pricing fantastic."

"The SSD is a little bit expensive."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pricing and cost advice

"The price of Qumulo is reasonable."

"The price of the solution is in the middle range compared to others. We look at the price per terabyte."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user182013

Federal Civ/Intel Engineering Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 1, 2015

Measuring Up: EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR

Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	74
Large Enterprise	170

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE Primera?

HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective, it is reliable, easy to set up, stable, and offers quality block storage. All...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

As a customer, I always prefer to have a lower price. Any customer will always ask for the cheaper price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

I have no specific ideas for improvement at present. We just need to verify whether our current virtual server setup is acceptable to the RBI, as they had raised questions about the VSO, ISO config...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Primera vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

Dell Unity XT vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

NetApp AFF vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

HPE MSA vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Competitors

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Qumulo

Compared 17% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Qumulo

Compared 11% of the time

VAST Data vs Qumulo

Compared 7% of the time

Everpure FlashBlade vs Qumulo

Compared 7% of the time

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Qumulo

Compared 3% of the time

More Qumulo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

April 2026

Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ product report

Buyer's Guide

NAS

April 2026

Download Qumulo product report

Also Known As

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage

No data available

Overview

HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers unparalleled performance and flexibility for enterprise storage needs. It is highly valued for its manageability and advanced capabilities, making it ideal for mission-critical workloads.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a high-performance storage system known for its ease of use and robust architecture. It supports seamless upgrades and is adaptable to evolving technology, making it an excellent choice for electronic medical records, virtualization, and centralized data management. With integration capabilities supporting applications like SQL Server, VMware, and SAP, it effectively meets diverse business needs.

What are the key features of HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks with an intuitive interface.
Reliability: Offers high availability and robust architecture for mission-critical workloads.
Flash Storage: Provides fast data access and improved performance.
Dynamic Provisioning: Enhances scalability and resource allocation.
Data Deduplication: Reduces storage costs by eliminating duplicate data.
Tiered Storage: Optimizes data storage with automated tiering.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Performance: Handles demanding workloads with efficiency.
Scalability: Grows with enterprise needs without compromising performance.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems and applications.
Proactive Support: Ensures smooth operation with timely updates and support.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is employed in industries like healthcare and finance, supporting applications such as Oracle databases and SAP. It enhances data processing and provides essential storage for virtual and real-time applications, meeting the rigorous demands of sectors requiring reliable and high-performance storage solutions.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Qumulo offers an efficient and reliable file-sharing platform with real-time analytics and seamless integration with major cloud services, ensuring ease of use and high IO speed for storage needs.

With its focus on file sharing, real-time analytics, and reliability, Qumulo allows for smooth operations, ease of use, and resilience. It boasts integration with AWS and Google Cloud, providing enhanced functionality with a strong operational cost-to-complexity ratio. Despite requests for software upgrades and better support for certain protocols, it remains a competitive choice for centralized media storage and object-based storage solutions.

What are Qumulo's most important features?

File Sharing: Offers seamless file sharing capabilities.
Reliability: Ensures stable and dependable operations.
Ease of Use: Designed with user-friendly interfaces.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights and data analysis.
No Downtime Updates: Supports upgrading without interruptions.
Failover Capability: Allows disaster recovery operations.
Cloud Integration: Compatible with AWS and Google Cloud.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Performance: High IO speed in storage systems.
Cost Efficiency: Benefits from operational cost-to-complexity ratio.
Data Insights: Detailed analytics on processes and usage.
Integration Potential: Easy integration with cloud and backup platforms.

Organizations in marketing and entertainment industries rely on Qumulo for managing files, media storage, and archiving needs. On-premises deployments are common for centralized media storage, facilitating object-based storage for videos, images, and office data support. The solution appeals to solution providers and resellers seeking market presence with application versatility.

Qumulo

Sample Customers

Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC

County of Riverside Sheriff Department, Hyundai Mobis Automotive North America, University of Arizona, UCSD - San Diego Supercomputer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Sinclair Oil, Royal Dutch Shell, Kaiser Permanente, Deluxe Creative, Vexcel Imaging, University of Florida, The Madison Square Garden Company, Arizona State University, Cinesite, San Diego Padres Baseball, Johns Hopkins University - School of Medicine, IHME, EllieMae, Washington State University.

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Qumulo

April 2026

Free Report: HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Qumulo

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Qumulo and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Qumulo report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.