"It is very durable and that is particularly important."
"The cost was the main reason we chose to use this solution."
"The ratio of total operational cost to complexity versus feature set is very good."
"The feature that I like most is the analytics part of the file system."
"The most valuable feature is real-time analytics."
"As it is an S3 solution with the same protocol as the one we have with AWS, having better integration with AWS will be beneficial."
"It is a cloud-based environment and at times, it is not very simple to use."
"In the future, I would like to see non-disruptive updates."
"Qumulo should continue to expand automation and orchestration capabilities."
"The price of the software is a bit expensive, so a reduction in cost would make it more competitive."
Cloudian HyperStore is ranked 11th in File and Object Storage with 2 reviews while Qumulo is ranked 16th in File and Object Storage with 3 reviews. Cloudian HyperStore is rated 7.0, while Qumulo is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cloudian HyperStore writes "A reasonable-priced and durable solution for storing our company backup data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qumulo writes "Easy to set up, good technical support, and it provides valuable usage analytics ". Cloudian HyperStore is most compared with MinIO, Scality RING8, Dell EMC ECS, NetApp StorageGRID and IBM Cloud Object Storage, whereas Qumulo is most compared with Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), Scality RING8, Pure Storage FlashBlade, NetApp FAS Series and FreeNAS. See our Cloudian HyperStore vs. Qumulo report.
See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
