Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs HPE MSA comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
HPE 3PAR StoreServ enhances performance, reduces downtime, and improves scalability, cost efficiency, and productivity with notable power and space savings.
Sentiment score
8.2
HPE MSA provides cost-effective storage management, offering an excellent return on investment by efficiently handling multiple servers.
If they're investing in 3PAR, they are getting a good return.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
HPE 3PAR StoreServ is praised for proactive support but needs improved global consistency and advanced-level communication.
Sentiment score
7.2
HPE MSA support is generally effective but varies regionally, with some delays and inefficiencies in hardware issue resolution.
If we activate the 3PAR call home function, then the remote technician always has access to our StoreServ and provides strong suggestions to improve our 3PAR performance.
I would rate technical support a three out of five due to the lack of effectiveness in preventing recurring problems.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
HPE 3PAR StoreServ is scalable and adaptable, efficiently handling large datasets and workloads, praised for seamless growth.
Sentiment score
7.8
HPE MSA is praised for scalability and storage expansion but has configuration challenges; ideal for small to medium enterprises.
HPE MSA's scalability benefits are notable as its speed and performance are good.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
HPE 3PAR StoreServ is praised for its stability, reliability, rapid issue resolution, proactive alerts, and robust performance.
Sentiment score
8.4
HPE MSA is commended for stability, reliability, and consistent performance, with efficient RAID management despite minor firmware issues.
HPE 3PAR is a very stable solution from HPE, and people have been using this for more than five years.
I faced issues with hard disk reliability, as they frequently fail and risk losing redundancy.
 

Room For Improvement

HPE 3PAR StoreServ needs better integration, improved features, and enhanced support to address user concerns about performance and scalability.
Users seek enhancements in storage, scalability, cloud integration, and support, emphasizing security, replication, and improved monitoring tools.
In Pakistan, some parts are not readily available, and we need to import them from Singapore or other countries.
Data security features are more important to me than anything else, and I think HPE MSA lacks in this area.
 

Setup Cost

HPE 3PAR StoreServ's pricing varies greatly; complexities in setup and licensing can be mitigated through discounts and all-inclusive options.
HPE MSA users have mixed opinions on pricing, citing reasonable features but concerns over costs and storage expansion.
It is expensive, however, when we compare it to the features provided by HPE, the price-to-performance ratio is very good.
The pricing of HPE MSA is not deemed reasonable.
 

Valuable Features

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is renowned for its manageability, scalability, performance, cost-effectiveness, and strong support, ensuring consistent, uninterrupted operations.
HPE MSA is valued for reliability, cost-effectiveness, management ease, flexibility, scalability, and features like snapshots and data deduplication.
There is no downtime when we upgrade our 3PAR systems.
Compared to Huawei, however, I found that Huawei's processing power, performance, and cost were more advantageous.
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Ranking in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
302
Ranking in other categories
NAS (6th), All-Flash Storage (9th)
HPE MSA
Ranking in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) category, the mindshare of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is 9.6%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE MSA is 19.6%, up from 16.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Saqib - PeerSpot reviewer
Uninterrupted upgrades accelerate performance with good support
I would rate the solution eight out of ten. It should be noted that in Pakistan, some parts are not readily available, and we need to import them from Singapore or other countries. We encountered an issue with a customer where the midplane failed and was not available. We had to wait for several days for a replacement, even in a 24/7 support case. Additionally, we faced motherboard failures in the customer's environment, encountering two motherboard failures simultaneously. We obtained one motherboard immediately, yet had to wait ten days for another. These issues should have been resolved promptly given the 24/7 support level.
Pragnesh Sachania - PeerSpot reviewer
Scalable, easy to manage, and used for virtualization environments
We didn't face any issues with the technical functionality. However, we faced a lot of challenges with our custom configuration. The HPE support person who did the installation was very technical. He answered all the queries, and we resolved the entire setup. We set up the storage as per our requirements. We previously used a physical server instead of virtualization. With the help of an HPE engineer and partners, we prepared a strategy for migrating the entire physical servers to our virtualization infrastructure. It took two days to deploy the solution. Six people were involved in the solution's deployment, including two from HPE and four from our IT team.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions are best for your needs.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user182013 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 1, 2015
Measuring Up: EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR
Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
85%
Computer Software Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
2%
Manufacturing Company
1%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
7%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE Primera?
HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective, it is reliable, easy to set up, stable, and offers quality block storage. All...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE 3PAR StoreServ?
It is expensive, however, when we compare it to the features provided by HPE, the price-to-performance ratio is very good.
What do you like most about HPE StorageWorks MSA?
The most valuable feature of HPE StorageWorks MSA is its flexibility.
What needs improvement with HPE StorageWorks MSA?
It needs more details on how to integrate with the cloud for backup scenarios. It should show more options for cloud backup support.
 

Also Known As

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage
HP StorageWorks MSA
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC
Femsa CSC, TTX, Rabobank
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. HPE MSA and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.