Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Heimdal Patch and Asset Management vs Nanitor comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Heimdal Patch and Asset Man...
Ranking in Patch Management
20th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nanitor
Ranking in Patch Management
52nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (98th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (70th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (12th)
 

Featured Reviews

Melvin Ong - PeerSpot reviewer
Has plug-and-play capability once configured and good reporting system
The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits.
Use Nanitor?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
851,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Educational Organization
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
University
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Thor Foresight Enterprise
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Brother, Symbion, CPH West
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLSoftware , Qualys and others in Patch Management. Updated: May 2025.
851,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.