Guardz vs VMware Carbon Black Endpoint comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Guardz and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Guardz is ranked #72, while Broadcom is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.0. Guardz holds a 0.5% mindshare in EDR, compared to Broadcom’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Guardz users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Guardz and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR).

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,714 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Guardz is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is 1.9%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint	1.9%
Guardz	0.5%
Other	93.8%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Steve Bowtell

Managing Director at Cyber Active

Exceptionally easy to integrate and covers a multitude of cybersecurity issues

The solution's interface appears very simple, but it is very complicated in the back end. So, it removes all the complications that an MSP or an MSSP would normally have. The solution's maintenance depends on whether you run it like an MDR platform where you provide the detection response part for the customer. That would normally be the MSP part. Sometimes, you have customers who are just happy to get an email and tell them what the problem is, and they fix it themselves. If there's no in-house expertise, the MSP or the MSSP can do the maintenance. If there's in-house expertise, it's just a matter of advising them. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Paanob-Mahanarongchai

CTO at Microsoft

Improved incident investigation has supported response while core protection still needs progress

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint does not have easy integration, as there are many complexities with the Ribitava API, which is very deep. I rate this solution overall as a five or six on a scale from one to ten. I have integrated VMware Carbon Black Endpoint with other tools that are helpful. I think this solution should be targeted at small clients, because adoption will grow more with small businesses tomorrow.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Since they've done their most recent update, the ease to isolate endpoints is valuable. If we find one where there is a virus on it, we can easily isolate it. We don't even have to contact the user. We don't have to manually take them off the network. We can easily isolate them."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has accelerated the response time for my security team, so we have been able to resolve issues faster than usual."

"The solution allows us to make investigations. Other XDR solutions also provide similar capabilities but for investigation, Cortex XDR is better."

"Stability-wise, it is good; I did not hear about any issues in terms of stability, and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be trusted completely."

"Cortex covers everything I need. It's a perfect solution. Cortex provides a different level of visibility because it's an extended EDR, allowing you to grab logs from the network and firewalls. Palo Alto invented the concept of the extended EDR or XDR."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is specifically designed to prevent zero-day attacks and is part of an ecosystem of Palo Alto, providing customers with a long-term vision to modify and redesign how security is applied in their company."

"It detected stuff that other things wouldn't detect."

"The most valuable feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is the low consumption of system resources. The solution uses a lot of AI and machine learning."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The solution is exceptionally easy to integrate and covers a multitude of cybersecurity issues."

"The capabilities of this tool are almost limitless."

"We can access computers remotely if we need to."

"While there is an IR team that is responsible for managing EDR or deep analytics, our focus is on endpoint and antivirus protection, where we encounter signature updates, look for false positives in their relation to file interpretation, and can instantly respond by putting a policy in place to immediately stop the false positives instead of sending a sample and waiting for coverage."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"It has improved our protection to have less false-positives, we have a greater ability to find malware notifications, and it has improved between 30-35% more than prior to our use of the solution."

"The threat analysis functionality is good."

"It actually does some heuristics, and some behavioral analysis."

"The product is very smooth and pretty simple."

More VMware Carbon Black Endpoint pros

Cons

"Cortex does not offer an on-premises solution. However, some customers would prefer not to be on the cloud. It would be ideal if it could offer something on-prem as well."

"I recommend adding a data loss prevention (DLP) solution to Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products."

"It's more focused on network communication. If a customer wants to increase the level of protection and start working with documents, it's impossible to integrate these features into the system. It's more of a communication-oriented system than a content security-oriented system."

"I have run into some detection issues with Cortex XDR. It needs to be better at detection of internal attacks."

"While using Cortex, I noticed some aspects that could be improved, such as increasing the synchronization speed between XDR and Xnor."

"Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks could improve by adding a sandbox feature to better compete with their competitors which have it."

"The MAC agent is not as robust feature-wise as the PC version."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The solution's security awareness training and phishing are very United States-focused and don't work very well in Australia."

"I'm actually looking for a replacement because of the fact that we lost that integration."

"The directions for Splunk are spot on, but it is difficult to find anything on integration with AlienVault,"

"I would personally give the tech support a rating of seven out of ten."

"Occasionally, we'll have issues with the latest version and they'll basically tell us that they will improve it in the next iteration. They need to work on their version release quality."

"What was rolled out to my company are mixed versions of Carbon Black CB Defense, so what I'd like to see in the next release is more synchronization, where it can detect the endpoint that's running an old version and suggest updates."

"The endpoint machines need improvement."

"I'm not sure as to the logic of how we've decided to customize it. We've only really used it since February and therefore there may be more to do on that front. That's why it's hard to say if something is missing or if we just aren't utilizing it."

"There could be more knowledge. I think they made a mistake when they took away the Check Point integration, because it provides more automation and also more threat intelligence."

More VMware Carbon Black Endpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I feel it is fairly priced."

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

"The tool's price is moderate."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is quite an expensive solution."

"It has a yearly renewal."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"This is an expensive solution."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"I like Guardz's pricing model because it's very cost-effective and has no long-term commitments."

"The cost/benefit factor has great relevance in Cb Defense implementations."

"The licensing cost is on the more expensive side, but I thought it was worth it because they did a good job. It was one of the vendors I truly didn't have to worry about too much until this latest upgrade."

"Price-wise, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is a highly-priced solution. Regarding the licensing cost of the solution, one needs to opt for an annual subscription."

"The license is annual. It's a standard license."

"It is more expensive, but it's worth it. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"We have branches, we have different companies, but we cannot buy less than 100 licenses. This does not make sense to me... It should be more flexible. I can understand their saying, "Okay, to be a customer you need 100," but to add on to that number it should be something very straightforward. If I need to add five, for example, I shouldn't need to add 100."

"Carbon Black provides competitive pricing."

"The product is expensive. There are some additional costs apart from the standard licensing charges attached to the solution."

More VMware Carbon Black Endpoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,714 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Educational Organization

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	57

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	33

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What to choose: an endpoint antivirus, an EDR solution or both?

I can recommend Carbon Black, an award-winning next-gen anti-virus (NGAV) and endpoint detection and response (EDR) s...

See all answers

What's the difference between Carbon Black CB Response and Carbon Black CB Defense?

Carbon Black offers two different levels of Endpoint Detection and Response. One is the VM Carbon Black Cloud Endpoin...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Carbon Black CB Defense?

My rating for the pricing of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is that it is not cheap, but it is also not as inexpensive ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Confluera vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Coro vs Guardz

Compared 17% of the time

Avanan vs Guardz

Compared 16% of the time

Cynet vs Guardz

Compared 9% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Guardz

Compared 8% of the time

Huntress Managed ITDR vs Guardz

Compared 6% of the time

More Guardz Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

November 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Email Security

October 2026

Download Guardz product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint

October 2026

Download VMware Carbon Black Endpoint product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Carbon Black CB Defense, Bit9, Confer

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Guardz provides a comprehensive suite designed for cybersecurity risk management, offering innovative tools implemented across different sectors. Its feature-rich platform aids companies in mitigating risks and improving overall security posture.

Guardz encompasses industry-specific cybersecurity solutions. Leveraging AI and machine learning, it offers robust protection against evolving cyber threats. With scalable options to suit business needs, Guardz supports compliance with legal standards, streamlining threat detection, and response. Seamless integration capabilities allow for easy incorporation into existing IT infrastructures, making it an ideal choice for organizations prioritizing enhanced security measures and operational efficiency.

What are Guardz's Most Intriguing Features?

AI-Driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats in real-time.
Scalable Security Solutions: Tailored to meet varying business requirements, ensuring robust protection across different scales.
Compliance Management: Facilitates alignment with industry regulations and standards, reducing compliance risks.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with existing systems to ensure a smooth transition and adoption.

What Benefits Should Users Look for in Reviews?

Enhanced Security: High-level protection against data breaches and cyber attacks.
Improved Compliance: Streamlines processes to meet regulatory requirements efficiently.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual work through automation and intelligent threat detection.
Cost-effective: Scalable solutions that optimize budget and resource allocation.

In finance, Guardz aids in safeguarding sensitive client data and ensuring regulatory compliance, essential for maintaining client trust and avoiding hefty fines. Retailers use it to protect customer information, reducing the risk of data theft and enhancing consumer satisfaction. Health sectors deploy it to secure patient records, ensuring privacy and meeting healthcare directives. With diverse use cases, Guardz adapts to meet unique sector requirements, illustrating its implementation flexibility across industries.

Guardz

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint uses behavioral analysis and cloud management to detect threats, stop suspicious activities, and ensure security with features like real-time monitoring and machine learning.

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides robust threat detection with centralized cloud management and behavioral analysis to prevent security breaches. Suitable for both cloud and on-premise environments, it enhances cybersecurity with seamless scaling, integrates with software for advanced threat hunting, and ensures policy management through application control.

What are the most important features of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint?

Behavioral Analysis: Identifies suspicious activities using behavior patterns.
Cloud Management: Centralizes security operations for efficiency.
Real-Time Monitoring: Offers continuous surveillance to catch threats early.
Machine Learning: Enhances threat detection with AI-driven insights.
Application Control: Manages policy enforcement easily.
Threat Hunting: Integrates with software for comprehensive analysis.

What benefits can be expected from VMware Carbon Black Endpoint?

Proactive Security: Prevents threats before they materialize.
Scalability: Adjusts to growing security needs effortlessly.
Improved Compliance: Helps maintain regulatory standards through advanced technologies.
Streamlined Management: Reduces time spent on security administration.

In industries like finance and healthcare, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is implemented to secure sensitive data from cyber threats. It supports organizations in minimizing risks associated with malware and ransomware, protecting their endpoint environments through AI-driven detection and real-time monitoring.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Netflix, Progress Residential, Indeed, Hologic, Gentle Giant, Samsung Research America

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,714 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors and best Ransomware Protection vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.