We performed a comparison between Greenhouse and PeopleStrong based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Greenhouse has a better search function than other products and finds candidates quicker."
"It provides very good flexibility to create filters. Therefore, I can look at candidates' progress across different stages. I can also follow candidates to get updates about where they are in the cycle."
"I think the ease of use is one of the most valuable features."
"It has the capability of reporting. We, as a business team, found it good. In fact, we migrated to PeopleStrong essentially because of its reporting feature."
"The product has valuable flexibility for customization, user interface, and search capabilities."
"The UI and UX are fantastic."
"Some of the most valuable features are the onboarding experience of new employees, the employee service portal, and the entire performance management system."
"The mobile responsiveness is strong."
"The hiring process is good. It will create a process-oriented procedure in terms of hiring, promotion, the movement of people, and other related HR tasks."
"PeopleStrong Alt is flexible because it allows customization and the user's experience is very good."
"Probably the biggest issue with Greenhouse is that the scheduling portion isn't very strong or smart."
"If we have to schedule multiple interviews in Greenhouse, we will have to schedule them individually."
"There are dashboards that I can see, but for pending things that I have to look at, it should provide alerts. For example, if there are 10 new people who are added to the job that I'm involved with, it should provide me with a chart or notification so that I am prompted to look at it. Currently, I have to go and look at the dashboard. There should be a little bit of intelligence to prompt action."
"The solution's workflow can improve by adding more customization at the organizational level."
"Sometimes, we feel that we should have an API-based integration aspect."
"The global scalability and support could improve."
"It would be helpful if you could work offline because sometimes, we have problems with internet connectivity."
"They could include a sort of collaborative platform where employees are able to work together with a chat mechanism like WhatsApp and video chat."
"They could improve talent management capabilities."
"They had challenges getting the performance management system up and integrated with our systems."
Greenhouse is ranked 3rd in Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software with 3 reviews while PeopleStrong is ranked 4th in Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software with 7 reviews. Greenhouse is rated 8.0, while PeopleStrong is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Greenhouse writes "A solid, easy-to-use tool with room for improvement in the scheduling features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleStrong writes "Simple, easy to access and interface is quite user-friendly. ". Greenhouse is most compared with SmartRecruiters, whereas PeopleStrong is most compared with PeopleSoft, SAP SuccessFactors, DarwinBox, SAP HCM and ZingHR. See our Greenhouse vs. PeopleStrong report.
See our list of best Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software vendors.
We monitor all Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
