Greenhouse vs PeopleStrong comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Greenhouse
Ranking in Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PeopleStrong
Ranking in Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software
5th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Talent Management (13th), Cloud HCM (12th), Talent Acquisition (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software category, the mindshare of Greenhouse is 5.6%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PeopleStrong is 5.6%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Talent Management
2.1%
Cloud HCM
2.6%
 

Featured Reviews

CD
Jul 19, 2022
A solid, easy-to-use tool with room for improvement in the scheduling features
Probably the biggest issue with Greenhouse is that the scheduling portion isn't very strong or smart. Scheduling is something that is critical and important and speeds the whole interview and hiring process quite a bit. Some other companies have built the scheduling portion of the tool to be a whole lot more user-friendly. For example, if you're scheduling panel interviews and you've got someone coming onsite for five interviews, with some companies like Lever, you can go in and look at everyone's calendar and it will help find the time and organize the interviews in such a way that you don't have to go back and forth with four or five different hiring managers to check their availability.
UD
Dec 14, 2023
Has an efficient user interface, but the reporting feature needs improvement
We use the product for recruitment purposes. It helps us with onboarding and exit management The software reduces the cost of investment for recruitment. It provides a good data quality for incentives. We can deliver a consistent workflow experience for our candidates. The product has valuable…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Greenhouse has a better search function than other products and finds candidates quicker."
"I think the ease of use is one of the most valuable features."
"It provides very good flexibility to create filters. Therefore, I can look at candidates' progress across different stages. I can also follow candidates to get updates about where they are in the cycle."
"It has the capability of reporting. We, as a business team, found it good. In fact, we migrated to PeopleStrong essentially because of its reporting feature."
"The mobile responsiveness is strong."
"PeopleStrong Alt is flexible because it allows customization and the user's experience is very good."
"The hiring process is good. It will create a process-oriented procedure in terms of hiring, promotion, the movement of people, and other related HR tasks."
"The UI and UX are fantastic."
"Some of the most valuable features are the onboarding experience of new employees, the employee service portal, and the entire performance management system."
"The product has valuable flexibility for customization, user interface, and search capabilities."
 

Cons

"There are dashboards that I can see, but for pending things that I have to look at, it should provide alerts. For example, if there are 10 new people who are added to the job that I'm involved with, it should provide me with a chart or notification so that I am prompted to look at it. Currently, I have to go and look at the dashboard. There should be a little bit of intelligence to prompt action."
"Probably the biggest issue with Greenhouse is that the scheduling portion isn't very strong or smart."
"If we have to schedule multiple interviews in Greenhouse, we will have to schedule them individually."
"They could improve talent management capabilities."
"They had challenges getting the performance management system up and integrated with our systems."
"It would be helpful if you could work offline because sometimes, we have problems with internet connectivity."
"They could include a sort of collaborative platform where employees are able to work together with a chat mechanism like WhatsApp and video chat."
"Sometimes, we feel that we should have an API-based integration aspect."
"The global scalability and support could improve."
"The solution's workflow can improve by adding more customization at the organizational level."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is pretty affordable for startups and medium-level companies."
"The one thing I didn't like, and what caused me to move from Greenhouse, was that they wanted to bump us up almost 20% over what the previous cost was."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"It's very reasonably priced. It is paid per employee."
"The product has reasonable pricing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Real Estate/Law Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Construction Company
9%
University
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Greenhouse?
Greenhouse has a better search function than other products and finds candidates quicker.
What needs improvement with Greenhouse?
When we use Lever, we can look at five different calendars at once and schedule a candidate for five different interviews. I don't think that we're able to do that with Greenhouse. Lever just makes...
What is your primary use case for Greenhouse?
We use the product to post jobs and organize job descriptions. We also use it for applicant tracking, reviewing resumes, reaching out to applicants, and scheduling appointments.
What do you like most about PeopleStrong Alt?
It has the capability of reporting. We, as a business team, found it good. In fact, we migrated to PeopleStrong essentially because of its reporting feature.
What is your primary use case for PeopleStrong Alt?
We use it for our payroll system. We have use cases around the recruitment system with PeopleStrong itself. So, it is one additional service of PeopleStrong.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
PeopleStrong Alt
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Zenefits, Pinerest, Airbnb Inc., BrightRoll, Vimeo LLC, Evernote
Hyundai, Amara Raja, Air Asia, Tata Motors, Aviva, Schneider Electric, JLL Business Services, Schindler, Tata AIG, novo nordisk, Cipla
Find out what your peers are saying about Greenhouse vs. PeopleStrong and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.