"Google Cloud Speech-to-Text helps to keep my team more productive."
"We've found the solution scales well."
"You could dictate a bunch of stuff, and then you can get ChatGPT or something to clean it up."
"It was easy to understand, easy to configure, and easy to use."
"Google Cloud Speech-to-Text's trial experience could be improved by adding some extra minutes in the trial version."
"The one thing that I find is when I often use specialized terms, and the solution doesn't know them."
"The multilanguage support for the chatbot needs to be better."
"The quality needs to be updated. For speech to text, support for additional languages can be included. For example, support for the large markets in Eastern Europe, such as Polish or Romanian, would be nice."
Earn 20 points
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text is ranked 1st in Speech-To-Text Services with 3 reviews while IBM Watson Speech To Text is ranked 4th in Speech-To-Text Services. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text is rated 8.0, while IBM Watson Speech To Text is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Speech-to-Text writes "Though it's a good tool that allows you to dictate and create documents, it fails to detect certain specialized terms ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Watson Speech To Text writes "Easy to understand, configure, and use". Google Cloud Speech-to-Text is most compared with Microsoft Azure Speech Service, Amazon Transcribe and AssemblyAI, whereas IBM Watson Speech To Text is most compared with Microsoft Azure Speech Service, Amazon Transcribe, AssemblyAI and Rev.ai.
See our list of best Speech-To-Text Services vendors.
We monitor all Speech-To-Text Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.