Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Cloud Speech-to-Text vs Microsoft Azure Speech Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
Ranking in Speech-To-Text Services
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure Speech Service
Ranking in Speech-To-Text Services
2nd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Text-To-Speech Services (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Speech-To-Text Services category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Speech-to-Text is 15.1%, down from 18.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Speech Service is 18.9%, down from 25.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Speech-To-Text Services Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Azure Speech Service18.9%
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text15.1%
Other66.0%
Speech-To-Text Services
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2252211 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Architect & NLP Python Developer at a computer software company with 1-10 employees
Support challenges persist despite audio technology advancements
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text is not entirely accurate, so we have to correct for those errors in our AI software. It uses neural networks, and that stochastic processing is 70% to 75% accurate. It gets it wrong too often, and since I personally work with this, I don't appreciate that. However, they seem to be the best option currently. We have to write our own improvements because their tools to improve transcription accuracy in our domain aren't very powerful. The timestamp technology for recognized words is inadequate, so we don't use it. We understand words based on their meaning, and we have a whole AI engine that does that, which is one of our differentiators from a product standpoint. We didn't use the custom voice creation feature; we just use their voices, which are fine for our purposes.
RM
Business Director at central it
Facilitating seamless international communication through efficient transcription and translation tasks
The product is limited when it comes to integrating with different platforms and using many other APIs. The marketplace is very limited and it's difficult to implement solutions in it. Enhancing features by integrating with other AI solutions like Gemini and Menus, as well as improving communication across platforms, would make it a more comprehensive solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The implementation is simple, and the outputs are very accurate and crisp."
"We've found the solution scales well."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"During the time I used Google Cloud Speech-to-Text, it was very impactful to the organization as it made our tasks much easier to perform."
"I would suggest Google Cloud Speech-to-Text to others, primarily for the speaker diarization feature."
"You could dictate a bunch of stuff, and then you can get ChatGPT or something to clean it up."
"Google Cloud Speech-to-Text sounds incredibly natural, which is impressive."
"Google Cloud Speech-to-Text helps to keep my team more productive."
"Useful text-to-speech and speech-to-text features."
"The documentation and boilerplate code [a template of code] was available."
"Overall, in my opinion, the transcription service is rated as ten out of ten."
 

Cons

"Google Cloud Speech-to-Text's trial experience could be improved by adding some extra minutes in the trial version."
"Since it is a paid service, it is very difficult to access if a user does not have the credentials. Also, we have to create the API keys and secret keys repeatedly to maintain authentication and privacy."
"The multilanguage support for the chatbot needs to be better."
"Google Cloud Speech-to-Text is 100 out of 100 when it works, and when it doesn't work, which is fairly often, it gets a zero. It doesn't fail gracefully; it fails in an unexpected way."
"Sometimes, speaker diarization is affected, leading to incorrect speaker identification."
"Given the numerous accents and dialects in India, Google Cloud Speech-to-Text could improve its handling of Indian accents."
"The tool's telephony model does not produce accurate results."
"The one thing that I find is when I often use specialized terms, and the solution doesn't know them."
"Lacks a voice recording option."
"The product is limited when it comes to integrating with different platforms and using many other APIs."
"It can improve based on the native language."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's cost is also very low. The tool is cheaply priced. It charges around 0.13 INR per call with a duration of five minutes."
"Cost-wise, I would say it is all-inclusive in the payment made to Google."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Speech-To-Text Services solutions are best for your needs.
879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Healthcare Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Speech-to-Text?
Our experience with pricing and licensing for Google Cloud Speech-to-Text is that we didn't have any other viable choices, so we cannot effectively evaluate if it's well-priced or badly priced.
What needs improvement with Google Cloud Speech-to-Text?
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text is not entirely accurate, so we have to correct for those errors in our AI software. It uses neural networks, and that stochastic processing is 70% to 75% accurate. It g...
What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Speech-to-Text?
I can answer questions about my experience with SQL Server as we are trying to capture reviews for SQL Server. We don't use the reporting services within SQL Server; we're using this for heavy-duty...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Speech Service?
The product is included and does not incur any additional costs. Pricing information is not available at the moment.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Speech Service?
The product is limited when it comes to integrating with different platforms and using many other APIs. The marketplace is very limited and it's difficult to implement solutions in it. Enhancing fe...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure Speech Service?
I use Microsoft Azure Speech Service ( /products/microsoft-azure-speech-service-reviews ) for communication between different countries. It facilitates communication via emails, documents, and temp...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Azure Speech Service, MS Azure Speech Service
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Home Depot, Paypal, Target, HSBC, McKesson
KPMG
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Speech-to-Text vs. Microsoft Azure Speech Service and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.