GitLab vs Rapid7 AppSpider comparison

GitLab and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. GitLab is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while Rapid7 is ranked #31. GitLab holds a 2.2% mindshare in SAST, compared to Rapid7’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 88 GitLab reviews

17,371 Views
2,779 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews

1,407 Views
788 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitLab

Rapid7 AppSpider

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Rapid7 AppSpider and GitLab are both integral solutions in their respective areas of security and software development. GitLab appears to have the upper hand due to its versatility and integration capabilities, rated higher for its comprehensive features that justify its price point over AppSpider.

Features: Rapid7 AppSpider is recognized for its robust vulnerability scanning, detailed reporting, and comprehensive security assessments. GitLab offers extensive DevOps features, seamless integrations, and effective project management tools, which enhance its functionality.

Room for Improvement: Users of AppSpider desire improvements in scan speed, ease of customization, and better support during deployment. GitLab users look for enhancements in CI/CD pipeline performance, scalability, and integration flexibility due to its wider feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 AppSpider is noted for straightforward deployment but reviews on support responsiveness vary. GitLab achieves smooth deployments and proactive customer service, leading to higher user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: AppSpider is seen as reasonably priced, though users wish for better ROI through enhanced features. GitLab, albeit with higher costs, provides superior value through its extensive feature set and strong support, justifying the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Rapid7 AppSpider Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (12th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (10th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Rapid7 AppSpider

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.2%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitLab	2.2%
Rapid7 AppSpider	0.6%
Other	97.2%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Hiroshi Watanabe

Marketing Expert at J's communication

Clients benefit from broad authentication and effective crawling but need localization improvements

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found the most valuable features of GitLab are the GitClone, GitPush, GitPull, GitMatch, GitMit, GitCommit, and GitStatus."

"I like GitLab's security and SAS tools."

"The most important features of GitLab for us are issue management and all the CI/CD tools. Another aspect that I love about GitLab is the UI."

"Of all available products, it was the easiest to use and easy to install."

"I have found the most valuable feature is security control. I also like the branching and cloning software."

"The CI/CD pipeline with Helm has significantly improved deployment speed and efficiency."

"It speeds up our development, it's faster, safer, and more convenient."

"GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable."

More GitLab pros

"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 AppSpider is the vulnerability reporting data. Additionally, the data is reported in a convenient way rather than seeing them as a PDF. We are able to generate all the reports exactly what we want in a flexible way."

"I like the ability the product has to detect vulnerabilities quickly, when it has been released in our environment, then displaying them to us."

"One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization."

"Rapid7 AppSpider is good at managing different applications. It uses applets and generates reports to cover the PCA/GDPR compliance requirements."

"The setup is usually straightforward."

"When it is set up properly, it can do scanning on web apps with multiple engines automatically."

"It scans all the components developed within a web application."

"It is really accurate and the rate of false positives is very low."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

Cons

"I don't really like the new Kubernetes integration because it is pretty focused on the on-premise environment, but we're in a hybrid environment."

"Merge conflicts and repository maintenance could improve. If there is someone new to the system they would not know if there is a conflict."

"GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly."

"Even if I say I want some improvement, they will say it is already planned in the first quarter, second quarter, or third quarter. That said, most everything is quite improved already, and they're improving even further still."

"GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker."

"The price of GitLab could improve, it is high."

"The solution could be faster."

"We have only seen a couple of issues on Gitlab, which we use for building some of the applications."

More GitLab cons

"The performance of the solution could improve. When I compare the speed it is slower than others on the market. There are some tricks we use to help speed up the solution."

"For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users."

"The enterprise interface is too simple. It should be more customizable."

"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."

"The tech support is responsive but issues remain unresolved."

"Implementing Rapid7 AppSpider requires scanning and self-identification mechanisms. You can add different types of authentication to each scan."

"This price of this solution is a little bit expensive."

"Support response times are slow and can be improved."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is not very expensive but the price can be better."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."

"GitLab is a free solution to use."

"The open-source version is very good and the commercial version is reasonably priced."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"This is an open-source solution."

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

"The price is pretty fair."

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	43

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

We are currently using general GitLab, not GitLab Premium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

GitLab can be improved by being more responsive in the UI and offering better pricing for premium features, which would be useful for small startups. While GitLab's CI/CD is powerful, it is somewha...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 46% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 24% of the time

SonarQube vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 12% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 11% of the time

Acunetix vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 9% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 9% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

December 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider

December 2025

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

AppSpider

Overview

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

December 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Rapid7 AppSpider and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Rapid7 AppSpider report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.