Invicti Web + API vs Rapid7 AppSpider comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Invicti and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Rapid7 is ranked #31. Invicti holds a 2.6% mindshare in SAST, compared to Rapid7’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Invicti Web + API

Read 36 Invicti Web + API reviews

12,369 Views
6,308 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews

2,801 Views
1,961 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Invicti Web + API

Rapid7 AppSpider

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2026

Acunetix and Rapid7 AppSpider are both contenders in the domain of web application security testing. Acunetix appears to have the upper hand due to its noted flexibility and ease of use, which is highly favored in user reviews.

Features: Acunetix offers cloud and on-premises deployment with continuous scanning and vulnerability detection, praised for speed in scanning multiple domains, and customizable reports with low false-positive rates. Rapid7 AppSpider stands out for its efficient vulnerability detection, accurate reporting, and integration capabilities with software development life cycles.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix users mention the need for improved automatic subdomain scanning, enhancements in report export features, and more cost-effective pricing. Rapid7 AppSpider could improve its integration options, reduce false positives, and enhance comprehensive UI and support documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix provides flexibility with multiple deployment options like on-premises and hybrid cloud setups, with effective technical support. Rapid7 AppSpider is praised for its deployment and support but needs improvement in its integration documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Both Acunetix and Rapid7 AppSpider face scrutiny over their pricing models. Acunetix, despite higher costs, is often noted for delivering significant ROI due to its security effectiveness. Rapid7 AppSpider's pricing is more average but favors larger companies, though users find ROI satisfactory in terms of improved security processes.

To learn more, read our detailed Invicti Web + API vs. Rapid7 AppSpider Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Invicti Web + API vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,212 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti Web + API

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Vulnerability Management (30th), DevSecOps (7th)

Rapid7 AppSpider

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Invicti Web + API is 2.6%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Acunetix	2.6%
Rapid7 AppSpider	0.8%
Other	96.6%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

Hiroshi Watanabe

Marketing Expert at J's communication

Clients benefit from broad authentication and effective crawling but need localization improvements

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scalability is good. The scalability is more than good because it can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated as part of applications. So that really makes it a very, very versatile solution to have."

"After two years it's about 300%."

"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."

"Acunetix has an awesome crawler. It gives a referral site map of near targets and also goes really deep to find all the inputs without issues. This was valuable because it helped me find some files or directories, like web admin panels without authentication, which were hidden."

"I appreciate the features that Acunetix has for the speed and the fact that it is in the cloud, which does not put any resources in my network, so I can set up a scan, go to bed, come back, and see the reports in my email."

"The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code."

"The solution is paying for itself, as our applications are more secure."

"I haven't seen reporting of that level in any other tool."

More Invicti Web + API pros

"What I like most about AppSpider is that it's easy to use and its automated scan gives me all the details I need to know when it comes to vulnerabilities and their solutions."

"It does a scan that performs about 100 checks on web applications and produces a clear report on all of the vulnerabilities that are found."

"The entire solution is interactive and has a point-and-click user experience, which makes it easy to find items or drill down on information, and you don't need specialized skills to use the product."

"One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization."

"Rapid7 AppSpider is good at managing different applications. It uses applets and generates reports to cover the PCA/GDPR compliance requirements."

"Customer service has been quite good."

"The setup is usually straightforward."

"The solution is highly stable, rated at ten out of ten."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

Cons

"The vulnerability identification speed should be improved."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"Our experience with Acunetix has not been good, so we are in the process of switching solutions."

"There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better."

"However, their response is too slow."

"The cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side."

"The costs for the licensing have changed and it's not in our favor which is why we're now looking at other options."

"Acunetix should improve by further reducing false positives and providing more customized reports, plus better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps."

More Invicti Web + API cons

"The dashboard and interface are crucial and they need some improvement."

"It needs better integration with mobile applications."

"The product needs to be able to scale for large companies, like ours. We have millions of IP addresses that need to be scanned, and the scalability is not great."

"Integration could be better."

"AppSpider could improve in the area of integration. They need to add more integration opportunities."

"The tech support is responsive but issues remain unresolved."

"Implementing Rapid7 AppSpider requires scanning and self-identification mechanisms. You can add different types of authentication to each scan."

"The performance of the solution could improve. When I compare the speed it is slower than others on the market. There are some tricks we use to help speed up the solution."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

More Invicti Web + API pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

"The price is pretty fair."

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

In a typical enterprise environment, Acunetix is mainly used for visibility, detection, and investigation across network traffic. The main use cases usually fall into a few core areas, with primary...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I advise that Acunetix is the best option. Invest time in proper initial configuration and scope definitions. The tool is powerful, but its effectiveness depends heavily on how the authenticated ar...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Acunetix?

Everything is perfect and good, including the pricing and all related aspects.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.

See all answers

Comparisons

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 4% of the time

Invicti vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 4% of the time

More Invicti Web + API Competitors

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 11% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 11% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 5% of the time

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 3% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti Web + API

October 2026

Download Invicti Web + API product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider

September 2026

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

AppSpider

Overview

Acunetix is a robust web application security testing tool offering rapid scanning, user-friendly interfaces, and accurate vulnerability detection with minimal false positives. It supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, making it versatile for various security needs.

Acunetix is distinguished by its capability to identify critical vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting and SQL injection with high precision. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools, supporting continuous scanning and large-scale application management. The centralized dashboard and detailed automated reporting streamline operations. Despite its benefits, users suggest improvements like reducing false positives, flexible pricing, and enhanced API scanning. Better integration with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps is sought, alongside more comprehensive customization and faster scanning. Mobile application scanning and improved team collaboration tools are also desired.

What features make Acunetix stand out?

Rapid Scanning: Delivers fast and comprehensive security assessments.
User-Friendliness: Intuitive interface simplifies operations for diverse teams.
Detailed Reporting: Automated reports enhance vulnerability management.
High Accuracy: Detects vulnerabilities with minimal false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration supports continuous development processes.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating?

Vulnerability Detection: Critical for identifying potential security threats efficiently.
Flexibility: Supports both cloud and on-premises environments.
Compliance Support: Aids in meeting standards like PCI DSS.
Scalability: Capable of handling large-scale web applications.

Acunetix is widely implemented across industries undertaking web application security assessments, including those requiring penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. It ensures applications meet security protocols and complies with standards while fitting into CI/CD workflows for secure pre-release checks.

Invicti

Rapid7 AppSpider provides rapid vulnerability detection and comprehensive reporting, integrating seamlessly with development cycles to enhance web application security. It is widely recognized for its detailed remediation steps and compliance with international standards like ISO27001.

Renowned for its robust security assessment capabilities, Rapid7 AppSpider stands out by offering advanced crawling technology and interactive interface features. Despite its slower performance compared to some competitors, it efficiently manages applications with configurable reporting and a focus on reducing false positives. Users find its automation and extensive integration capabilities valuable, although they indicate a need for improved interface enhancements and better report localization for specific regions like Japan.

What are the key features of Rapid7 AppSpider?

Rapid Vulnerability Detection: Quickly identifies security issues within applications.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed, configurable reports for thorough analysis.
International Compliance: Aligns with standards such as ISO27001 for security assurance.
Extensive Integration: Integrates with various software development life cycles.
Interactive Interface: User-friendly design enhances ease of use and engagement.
Automation: Streamlines processes with automated scanning capabilities.
Portability: Easily managed across different environments and platforms.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating Rapid7 AppSpider?

Detailed Remediation Steps: Provides guidance on addressing identified vulnerabilities.
Low False Positives: Ensures higher accuracy in scan results.
Compliance Control: Helps maintain adherence to security standards and regulations.
API Auditing Capabilities: Extensive checks on web application interfaces.
Comprehensive Reports: Detailed documentation aids in security decision-making.

In sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology, companies leverage Rapid7 AppSpider to enhance their security management. It plays an integral role in vulnerability assessment processes, aiding in the compliance with international security standards and reforms in security testing strategies, especially during auditing and routine application scans.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Invicti Web + API vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

September 2026

Free Report: Invicti Web + API vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti Web + API vs. Rapid7 AppSpider and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Invicti Web + API vs. Rapid7 AppSpider report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.