Rapid7 AppSpider vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) comparison

Rapid7 and Sonar are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Rapid7 is ranked #32, while Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Rapid7 holds a 0.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to Sonar’s 22.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Rapid7 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Sonar users who would recommend it.

Rapid7 AppSpider

Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews

1,439 Views
763 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 116 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

43,055 Views
31,861 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

SonarQube Server and Rapid7 AppSpider compete in application security and code quality. SonarQube is favored for code quality features, while Rapid7 AppSpider leads in web application security testing.

Features: SonarQube's features include supporting over 20 programming languages, highlighting issues via custom-defined checks, and offering a strong open-source community. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Jenkins. Rapid7 AppSpider excels with detailed reporting and facilitates easy data mining, providing users with comprehensive insights into vulnerabilities.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube can improve by accelerating analysis time and simplifying settings navigation for multi-language projects. Enhanced support for more languages and better mobile application scanning are also needed. Rapid7 AppSpider is criticized for its slow scan speeds and limited integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube offers flexible deployment options and effective community-driven support, ideal for versatile organizational settings. Rapid7 AppSpider faces scalability issues but functions well in traditional environments like on-premises setups.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube is known for its cost-effectiveness, especially with its free community version and optional commercial plugins. This model makes it suitable for budget-conscious organizations. Although more expensive, Rapid7 AppSpider offers significant ROI through its robust security features and fixed pricing model.

To learn more, read our detailed Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,140 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 AppSpider

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

32nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

116

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 22.1%, down from 27.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rizwan-Alam

Head Information Security at Akhtar Fuiou Technologies

Easy automated web app scanning, but gives many false positives and isn't always stable

One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions. This is the main aspect that I hope to see Rapid7 improve on. Beyond reducing false positives, I would also like to see them implement better reporting features, particularly in the executive summary type of reports which need to be user-friendly and easily understood by non-technical people. The recommendations and solutions on these reports could always be improved to make them more relevant, too. Lastly, the stability isn't that great, and sometimes it becomes non-responsive. I feel like the stability of the application is very average and currently needs more work.

Read full review

Sthembiso Zondi

Head of Software Engineering at ronaldmariah@gmail.com

Consistent improvements in code quality and security with effective integration and reliable technical support

The features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) that I find most useful are the suggestions received from reviewing the code. When they review the code, they provide suggestions on how to fix it, and we find those very useful from a development perspective. We use SonarQube Server's (formerly SonarQube) centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve. We use that for organizational improvement purposes. The ability to tailor metrics tracking in SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has been beneficial to my team. There are team-specific dashboards which are related to specific repositories they utilize, and we have that aggregative dashboard that shows the whole organization's performance. We can drill down per specific repository, which makes it easier for the team to improve specific things.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like most about AppSpider is that it's easy to use and its automated scan gives me all the details I need to know when it comes to vulnerabilities and their solutions."

"One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization."

"I like the ability the product has to detect vulnerabilities quickly, when it has been released in our environment, then displaying them to us."

"Rapid7 AppSpider is good at managing different applications. It uses applets and generates reports to cover the PCA/GDPR compliance requirements."

"The solution is highly stable, rated at ten out of ten."

"I would say that it is stable, as I am not aware of any major issues."

"It scans all the components developed within a web application."

"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 AppSpider is the vulnerability reporting data. Additionally, the data is reported in a convenient way rather than seeing them as a PDF. We are able to generate all the reports exactly what we want in a flexible way."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

"The most valuable features are code scanning and Quality Gates."

"SonarQube is one of the more popular solutions because it supports 29 languages."

"The most valuable function is its usability."

"The depth features I have found most valuable. You receive a quick comprehensive comparison overview regarding the current release and the last release and what type of depths dependency or duplication should be used. This is going to help you to make a more readable code and have more flexibility for the engineers to understand how things should work when they do not know."

"The overall quality of the indicator is good."

"I am only interested in the security features in SonarQube. There are plenty of features other features, such as test coverage, code anomalies, and pointer access are handled by the business logic teams. They get the reports and they have to fix them in JIRA or Bugzilla."

"Overall, I would rate SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) as a 9 out of 10."

"I like the by-default policies that are they, as they seem to cover most of what I need."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

Cons

"The enterprise interface is too simple. It should be more customizable."

"For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users."

"The solution is too slow. It could take a full day to scan. Competitors are much faster."

"The tech support is responsive but issues remain unresolved."

"AppSpider has some problems with the RAM needed while scanning."

"The product needs to be able to scale for large companies, like ours. We have millions of IP addresses that need to be scanned, and the scalability is not great."

"The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users."

"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

"When we have a thousand products published over it, we expect it to be more efficient in terms of serving requests from the browser."

"We're in the process of figuring out how to automate the workflow for QA audit controls on it. I think that's perhaps an area that we could use some buffing. We're a Kubernetes shop, so there are some things that aren't direct fits, which we're struggling with on the component Docker side. But nothing major."

"A better design of the interface and add some new rules."

"Their dashboarding is very limited. They can improve their dashboards for multiple areas, such as security review, maintainability, etc. They have all this information, so they should publish all this information on the dashboard so that the users can view the summary and then analyze it further. This is something that I would like to see in the next version."

"The tool needs to be more compatible with C/C++ language"

"It should be user-friendly."

"We could use some team support, but since we are using the community version, it's not available."

"I think SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) should improve by integrating a new feature that includes AI. As soon as I see that they've got a new feature that integrates AI that is not as generative as other GenAI platforms that actually generate the code and help developers develop faster, I believe that capability is lacking."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

"The price is pretty fair."

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

"Compared to similar solutions, SonarQube was more accessible to us and had more benefits, with regards to size of the code base and supported languages. Apart from the Enterprise licensing fee, there are no additional costs."

"I do not know about the pricing as I am using the community edition, which is free. But I compared the pricing with Sigma, and it is higher than SonarQube."

"This is open source."

"We are using the Community edition of SonarQube."

"There is both a free and licensed version. The free version has limitations on development languages and support."

"A low cost long-term solution for non-critical situations."

"The product’s price is lower than Veracode’s price."

"The price of the solution could be reduced."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.

See all answers

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Comparisons

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 37% of the time

Acunetix vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

Invicti vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 6% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 16% of the time

Coverity vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 6% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider

August 2025

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

July 2025

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Also Known As

AppSpider

Sonar

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Rapid7

Sonar

Overview

SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

Rapid7

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

Sample Customers

Microsoft

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

July 2025

Free Report: Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Find out what your peers are saying about Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.