GitLab vs Jenkins vs TeamCity comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitLab Logo
9,551 views|7,786 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Jenkins Logo
6,756 views|5,825 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
JetBrains Logo
3,337 views|2,954 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitLab, Jenkins, and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good.""I like that you can use GitLab as a double-sided solution for both DevOps and version management. It's a good product for working in these two areas, and the user interface makes it easy to understand.""I like GitLab from the CI/CD perspective. It is much easier to set up CI/CD and then integrate with other tools.""The most valuable feature of GitLab is its convenience. I am able to trace back most of my changes up to a far distance in time and it helps me to analyze and see the older version of the code.""I have found the most valuable feature is security control. I also like the branching and cloning software.""The solution is stable.""GitLab is very well-organized and easy to use. Also, it offers most features that customers need.""GitLab is a solution for source code management, container registry, pipelines, testing, and deployment."

More GitLab Pros →

"The most valuable features of Jenkins are the integration of automatic scripts for testing and the user's ability to use any script.""It is very useful for us to be able to collect and manage automatic processing pipelines.""The auto-schedule feature is valuable. Another valuable feature is that Jenkins does not trigger a build when there is no change in any of the systems. Jenkins also supports most of the open-source plug-ins.""We used it for all continuous integration parts, like automation testing, deployment, etc.""The most valuable features of Jenkins are its ease of use and good plugins available. You are able to connect to a lot of solutions.""I am not aware of the available options in the market right now compared to Jenkins, but I am pretty much happy with the service that Jenkins is providing our company.""The most valuable aspect of Jenkins is pipeline customization. Jenkins provides a declarative pipeline as well as a scripted pipeline. The scripted pipeline uses a programming language. You can customize it to your needs, so we use Jenkins because other solutions like Travis and Spinnaker don't allow much customization.""The most valuable features are Jenkins Pipelines for ALM and full Deploy Cycle."

More Jenkins Pros →

"One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.""I have not yet implemented the remote build feature, but this will be a big plus. We want to be able to build legacy products on a build agent without developers needing to have obsolete tool sets installed on their local PC.""The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications.""We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted.""Using TeamCity and emailing everyone on fail is one way to emphasize the importance of testing code and showing management why taking the time to test actually does saves time from having to fix bugs on the other end.""It provides repeatable CI/CD throughout our company with lots of feedback on failures and successes to the intended audiences via email and Slack.""The integration is a valuable feature.""TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool."

More TeamCity Pros →

Cons
"It could have more security integrations and the ability to check the vulnerability of the code. I don't think it is a responsibility of Gitlab, but it would be nice to have more options to integrate with.""The documentation is confusing.""I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities.""Expand features to match other tools such as a static code analysis tool so third-party integrations are not required.""The documentation could be improved to help newcomers better understand things like creating new branches.""We'd always like to see better pricing on the product.""We would like to generate document pages from the sources.""Based on what I know so far, its integration with Kubernetes is not so good. We have to develop many things to make it work. We have to acquire third-party components to work with Kubernetes."

More GitLab Cons →

"Performance-wise. This needs to be improved. Not only performance-wise, some functionality or some features can be added to Jenkins.""I would like them to provide space for people to have a central node that stores all the logs of workspace information in a distributed fashion to facilitate backup and restoration. Currently, everything is stored on one node, so you need to set up distributed storage or an endpoint that you can use for backing up your information.""Jenkins is an old product, and we encounter performance issues and slow response. Also, some of the plugins are not stable.""It does not have a very user-friendly interface.""It can be improved by including automated mobile reporting integrations.""I sometimes face a bottleneck when installing the plugins on an offline machine. Mapping the dependencies and then installing the correct sequence of dependencies is a nightmare, and it took me two days to do it.""Tasks such as deployment, cloning, database switchover, and all other database missions and tasks are being done through Jenkins. If a job does not go through, at times the error message does not clearly indicate what caused the failure. I have to escalate it to the Jenkins DevOps team just to see what caused the failure. If the error message is clear, then I wouldn't have to escalate the issue to different teams.""UI is quite outdated."

More Jenkins Cons →

"It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there.""If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users.""Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone)​ to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly.""We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US.""Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted.""If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal.""I need some more graphical design.""The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."

More TeamCity Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a free product."
  • "Jenkins is open source."
  • "​It is free.​"
  • "Some of the add-ons are too expensive."
  • "It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."
  • "I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."
  • "Jenkins is open source and free."
  • "There is no cost. It is open source."
  • More Jenkins Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."
  • "The licensing is on an annual basis."
  • More TeamCity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis nowadays. The biggest difference upon initial inspection is that TeamCity is far more focused on validating individual commits rather than certain types of tests. Jenkins’ front page presents information that is simply not useful in a non-linear development environment, where people are often working in vastly different directions. How many of the previous tests passed/failed is not really salient information in this kind of situation. Running specific tests for individual commits on TeamCity is far more trivial in terms of interface complexity than Jenkins. TeamCity just involves clicking the ”…” button in the corner on any test type (although I wish it wasn’t so easy to click “Run” by accident). I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins out of the box. There’s a point at which you feel that if you have to scour the documentation to do anything remotely complex in an application, you’re dealing with a bad interface. One disappointing thing in both is that inter-branch merges improperly trigger e-mails to unrelated committers. I suppose it is fairly difficult to determine who to notify about failure in situations like these, though. It seems like TeamCity pulls up the… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide… more »
    Top Answer:For small-scale usage, GitLab offers a free tier. For enterprise pricing, GitLab is more expensive than GitHub, as it's… more »
    Top Answer:I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities… more »
    Top Answer:When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your… more »
    Top Answer:Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.
    Top Answer:TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool.
    Top Answer:It's open source, however, if you want your solution to be deployed on their cloud or on the cloud in general without… more »
    Top Answer:It's just a tool that I used. I needed to deliver something, so I did. I wasn't looking at it in a way to criticize it… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    9,551
    Comparisons
    7,786
    Reviews
    50
    Average Words per Review
    406
    Rating
    8.6
    2nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    6,756
    Comparisons
    5,825
    Reviews
    37
    Average Words per Review
    382
    Rating
    7.9
    6th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    3,337
    Comparisons
    2,954
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    531
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 50% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    IBM Rational Build Forge logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Digital.ai Release  logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    CircleCI logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    Learn More
    Overview

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

    Sample Customers
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox
    Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Media Company9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Hospitality Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise51%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.