Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitGuardian Platform vs Klocwork comparison

GitGuardian and Perforce are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitGuardian is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7, while Perforce is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.1. GitGuardian holds a 0.8% mindshare in AS, compared to Perforce’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitGuardian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Perforce users who would recommend it.
GitGuardian Platform
Read 32 GitGuardian Platform reviews
  • 4,023 Views
  • 2,012 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Klocwork
Read 25 Klocwork reviews
  • 3,592 Views
  • 2,047 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 28, 2025

Klocwork and GitGuardian compete in the software security and code analysis sector. GitGuardian appears to have the upper hand due to its broader range of integrations and secrets detection capabilities, which are highly valued by users.

Features: Klocwork offers static code analysis with integration into CI environments, allowing for customized checkers and low false-positive rates. Its incremental and on-the-fly analysis improves code quality by identifying defects early. GitGuardian excels in detecting secrets with low false-positive rates and provides real-time alerts. It offers a Dev in the loop feature, enabling swift remediation and collaboration between developers and security teams. GitGuardian supports diverse integrations, including API keys and secrets management.

Room for Improvement: Klocwork struggles with managing global variables, false positives, and static analysis rule complexity. It has limited language support and needs better dashboard tools and Agile DevOps integration. GitGuardian requires an improved user interface, support for more data environments, and enhanced analytics and customization options. Users also seek better team management features and smoother integration across broader security contexts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Klocwork deploys primarily on-premises or in private clouds with responsive technical support, although initial setup may take time. GitGuardian offers flexible public and private cloud deployments, as well as on-premises options. Both companies are praised for their responsive customer service, but GitGuardian provides a broader deployment scope with more cloud compatibility.

Pricing and ROI: Klocwork is competitively priced with flexible license models but is not cheap. Its ROI is demonstrated through improved compliance and reduced defect resolution time. GitGuardian is also considered reasonably priced, offering a free tier and straightforward pricing, which is advantageous for managing security risks and detection capabilities. GitGuardian's pricing could be a concern for larger user bases.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. Klocwork Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
GitGuardian Platform vs. Klocwork
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
GitGuardian Platform saves time and resources by automating vulnerability detection, reducing costs, and enhancing security efficiency.
Sentiment score
6.2
Klocwork enhances code quality and compliance, improving efficiency in defect resolution, especially in automotive sectors, despite ROI measurement challenges.
I can certainly say that we have saved significant time and resources in terms of people and automation.
The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
The main ROI factors include efficiency and how we meet compliance standards for various automotive requirements.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
Ney Roman - PeerSpot reviewer
AK
KG
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
GitGuardian's customer service is praised for responsiveness, knowledgeable support, proactive communication, and high user satisfaction ratings.
Sentiment score
6.8
Klocwork's support is praised for responsiveness, effective problem-solving, and reducing user contact via comprehensive documentation, despite prioritization issues.
It effectively helps us with credentials security and has been performing satisfactorily.
I would rate their technical support a nine out of ten.
I would rate the technical support as excellent.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
The customer support team is very responsive, proactive, and engages in conversations to ensure our needs are met.
The issue is not about the knowledge of the support but about the prioritization of the tickets they handle.
During the initial phase, there was a need for follow-ups and clarifications.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
KZ
AK
Ney Roman - PeerSpot reviewer
AA
KG
GR
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
GitGuardian Platform scales well across large codebases and integrates seamlessly, praised for responsive monitoring and customizable deployments.
Sentiment score
6.7
Klocwork is scalable, efficient, and integrates well with SAST tools, suitable for teams of all sizes without scalability issues.
In terms of scalability, I would rate it around a ten out of ten, as it handles all the repositories and commit activity we have.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Currently, what GitGuardian Platform is doing works effectively.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
Klocwork supports our scalability needs without issues, even as project volumes increase.
The program-to-program enablement is scalable.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
GM
AK
reviewer2721312 - PeerSpot reviewer
AA
PM
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Users regard GitGuardian as stable and reliable, experiencing minimal downtime and quick resolutions for occasional configuration issues.
Sentiment score
6.8
Klocwork is reliable and stable, effectively handling large codebases but requires significant computing power and faster updates.
We set up a lot of the repository, so GitGuardian is a required check.
The SaaS platform has experienced two significant moments of downtime or instability in the last six months, requiring notices and retrospectives.
I would rate the stability of the GitGuardian Platform as excellent with no downtimes.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
Installation is easy, and the solution is stable.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
GM
AK
Ney Roman - PeerSpot reviewer
GR
 

Room For Improvement

GitGuardian Platform requires customization, better integrations, advanced analytics, improved UI, mobile apps, and enhanced user management for efficiency.
Klocwork needs improved language support, flexible reporting, better integration with Agile DevOps, and enhanced static and dynamic analysis.
Another thing that would be good to see is some more metrics on the usage of the GitGuardian pre-push hooks.
The self-healing activity by developers isn't reflected in the analytics, requiring us to collect this data ourselves.
We are looking for better metrics and audit data, wanting more features such as knowing which users are creating the most secrets or committing the most secrets, what repository, what directory, and who is not checking in secrets.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
There are too many warnings, and it requires expertise to determine the correct category for them.
Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage.
We would like Klocwork to connect to Git and notify developers of issues tied to specific commits.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
GM
AK
reviewer2721312 - PeerSpot reviewer
GR
PM
AA
 

Setup Cost

GitGuardian offers value with a free plan for small teams but may be costly for large organizations.
Klocwork's flexible pricing models are valued, though opinions vary on cost-effectiveness, catering to diverse organizational needs.
Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
It is less expensive than Coverity.
The solution is not very cheap, however, it is less expensive than Coverity.
Klocwork was competitively priced, making it a cost-effective solution for us.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
AK
GM
PM
GR
AA
 

Valuable Features

GitGuardian excels in fast, accurate secret detection with seamless integration, low false positives, and efficient remediation features.
Klocwork provides efficient static code analysis with strong IDE integration, supporting multiple languages and enhancing code quality and collaboration.
One of the best features of the solution is the ability to use pre-push hooks.
A high number of our exposures are remediated by developers before security needs to step in, as the self-healing playbook process engages them automatically.
GitGuardian Platform performs the capability to detect secrets in real time exceptionally, as it activates from the commit and can detect it immediately.
For more quotes and insights, download the GitGuardian Platform report
The most valuable feature of Klocwork is the static analysis tools, which help identify potential security threats and errors.
Its integration with the CI/CD pipeline has helped streamline the software development process.
It takes just half a day to set up.
For more quotes and insights, download the Klocwork report
GM
AK
reviewer2721312 - PeerSpot reviewer
AA
KG
GR
 

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform
Ranking in Application Security Tools
8th
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
4th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (6th), Software Supply Chain Security (4th), DevSecOps (3rd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (4th)
Klocwork
Ranking in Application Security Tools
18th
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Static Code Analysis (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Klocwork is 1.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes
Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.
Read full review
AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Lets you find defects during the development phase, so you don't have to wait till the development is over to find and address flaws
What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity. What I'd like added in the next release of Klocwork is the peer code review Cahoots which used to be a part of Klocwork, and the architecture analysis and both have been taken out of Klocwork. I found the two critical for specific deployments, so if those can be brought back to Klocwork, that would be very good.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
18%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Manufacturing Company
26%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
See all answers
What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...
See all answers
What do you like most about Klocwork?
It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?
Klocwork's pricing seems attractive, as it uses a per-user license model that does not have a lot of overhead.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Klocwork?
One area for improvement is that when customers use different static analysis tools, they report more issues compared to Klocwork. The static analysis engine of Klocwork has areas that need improve...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitGuardian Platform Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitGuardian Platform
Compared 16% of the time
Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform Logo
Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform
Compared 14% of the time
GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform
Compared 12% of the time
SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform Logo
SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform Logo
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform
Compared 10% of the time
More GitGuardian Platform Competitors
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork
Compared 29% of the time
Coverity vs Klocwork Logo
Coverity vs Klocwork
Compared 28% of the time
Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork Logo
Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork
Compared 13% of the time
Helix QAC vs Klocwork Logo
Helix QAC vs Klocwork
Compared 6% of the time
Axivion Static Code Analysis vs Klocwork Logo
Axivion Static Code Analysis vs Klocwork
Compared 5% of the time
More Klocwork Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
GitGuardian Platform
August 2025
GitGuardian Platform reportDownload GitGuardian Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Klocwork
August 2025
Klocwork reportDownload Klocwork product report
 

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring
No data available
 

Overview

GitGuardian is an advanced secrets security platform that strengthens Non-Human Identity security and ensures compliance with industry standards by detecting and managing secrets in development environments.

GitGuardian integrates Secrets Security and Secrets Observability, facilitating the detection of compromised secrets and managing legitimate secrets' lifecycle. Supporting over 450 types of secrets, the platform offers public monitoring for leaked data and employs honeytokens as an added defense. Trusted by over 600,000 developers, organizations such as Snowflake and ING rely on GitGuardian for robust secrets protection.

What features define GitGuardian?
  • Internal Monitoring: Tracks confidential data like IDs and tokens.
  • Dev in the Loop: Rapid alerts for leaks.
  • Detection Capabilities: High accuracy with a low false-positive rate.
  • Integrations: Supports seamless integration with multiple platforms.
  • Customized Detectors: Offers tailored security solutions.
  • Multi-Vault Support: Facilitates efficient issue management.
What are the key benefits when evaluating GitGuardian?
  • Comprehensive Detection: Identifies AWS keys and other hardcoded secrets.
  • Efficient Remediation: Swiftly resolves issues.
  • Improved Security: Prevents accidental leaks of sensitive data.
  • Seamless Integration: Compatible with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps.

In sectors like healthcare and telecommunications, GitGuardian is implemented for detecting and managing the exposure of sensitive information in code repositories. Teams benefit from its ability to integrate with platforms such as GitHub, allowing for immediate alerts and efficient remediation of security risks, enhancing application security by safeguarding operational environments.

GitGuardian

Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

Perforce
 

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.
ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL
Buyer's Guide
GitGuardian Platform vs. Klocwork
July 2025
Free Report: GitGuardian Platform vs. Klocwork
Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Platform vs. Klocwork and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our GitGuardian Platform vs. Klocwork report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.