The best features Serverless offers include that you do not have to envision the whole architecture; you can work with the AWS resources through the codebase. It will still look like the whole backend is a normal application, while it is not being deployed as a single application. It basically interacts with services such as DynamoDB or IAM, depending upon the use cases. That is really valuable. What I appreciate most about the framework are both the flexibility and the integration with AWS resources. I also appreciate that we do not have to envision any cluster, so Lambda takes care of itself by definition, which is a beneficial feature to have. Serverless has positively impacted my organization as it has become the de facto standard for any POCs I have been doing, unless something specific is required that demands an on-demand instance. Otherwise, basic POCs and all internal applications have been using Serverless. A specific outcome related to Serverless's impact is that it saved time because I did not have to delve much into DevOps or pay external tools such as Kubernetes to manage the cluster, and it also reduced costs from the Serverless Framework. Serverless integrates with my existing tech stack and other tools seamlessly; it works flawlessly and is a service of its own, so it does not really affect anything else.
