GeneXus vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service comparison

Why PeerSpot?

GeneXus and Oracle are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. GeneXus is ranked #31, while Oracle is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0. GeneXus holds a 1.2% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Oracle’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GeneXus users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

GeneXus

Read 14 GeneXus reviews

2,287 Views
1,670 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Read 6 Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service reviews

2,914 Views
1,923 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

GeneXus

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and GeneXus are both low-code development platforms suitable for different user needs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service seems to have the upper hand in deployment simplicity and customer service responsiveness, while GeneXus stands out for its extensive functionality and long-term ROI.

Features: Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is known for strong integration capabilities, ease of use, and straightforward deployment. GeneXus is celebrated for robust automation features, support for multiple platforms, and a comprehensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service could improve its debugging tools, scalability, and possibly reduce initial setup costs. GeneXus might benefit from a more intuitive development environment, enhanced customer support, and better customer service efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is praised for a straightforward deployment model and responsive customer service. GeneXus, while effective in deployment, receives mixed reviews concerning customer service efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers competitive pricing with a good ROI, despite potentially high initial setup costs. GeneXus features higher initial costs, but users commend its long-term ROI due to its extensive capabilities, making it seem more valuable over time.

To learn more, read our detailed GeneXus vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GeneXus vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GeneXus

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

31st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Development Platforms (14th)

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of GeneXus is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service	1.5%
GeneXus	1.2%
Other	97.3%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

XavierEspinoza

Internal System Coordinator at Red CEDIA

Offers a simplified architecture with outstanding integration capabilities

The integration capabilities of GeneXus are highly valuable for our organization. The metadata obtained within the logic of different systems is also vital. Due to the solution, our company team doesn't have to work with multiple languages and integrations can be made with C Sharp. JavaScript can also be used with GeneXus, the tool takes charge of all the rest and has a simple architecture. The solution can be used out of the box without facing any issues and nothing much needs to be done with frameworks. In our case we need to use Python with GeneXus, we use Ironpython to embed python code in C# .

Read full review

Sherif Bashar

Head Of Digital Solutions at Aptec Ingrammicro

Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day

There are very minor things, like the feature called "action chains," that could use a bit of enhancement. But the team is perfect; they're working on it. An action chain is a sequence of actions triggered by a button or an event. It executes code in order, from top to bottom. For example, it could call a code, call a REST service, and then insert data into a database. It needs enhancement because it can be a bit complex for fresh grads or new developers to understand. It would be better if it was made more readable. That's the main point. But if you have experience, you'll understand it easily. One more thing I want to add about Visual Builder: up until two years ago, it supported native mobile development. That's not available anymore. They replaced native mobile development with progressive web apps, and most customers are complaining about that. We need native mobile development back – the ability to put apps on stores like Google Play or the App Store. That feature is not available right now, and they deprecated it starting in 2024. It's very important. Otherwise, clients go with Flutter or other mobile development tools. It would be good for Oracle to regain that capability. We need the native mobile development feature back.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With GeneXus, we can create logical representations of transactions in the form of objects."

"I like that it's very compatible with other tools. The most important feature is getting the developer to focus on the project's business case. It's not about focusing on how I can command this or how I can develop a front end, or how I can work with the advantages. The developer should focus on the business case of the project. No need to focus on connecting the database to the server or connecting the server and the front end. The developer can concentrate on the views."

"The front-end features are the most valuable."

"It is fast in creating systems and connects to the database quickly, so we can invest more time in resolving the problem and focusing on the cause."

"The solution provides ease of programming and the speed of delivery of demands."

"GeneXus evolves with technology."

"The integration capabilities of GeneXus are highly valuable for our organization"

"The most valuable feature is that GeneXus works with several languages. It's possible to develop chatbots and other functionalities."

More GeneXus pros

"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."

"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."

"You can avoid costly React developers that are required for building advanced UI."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The tool is very easy to use."

"The action chains are really helpful, and the trigger event, along with those action chains, has been very helpful."

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

Cons

"GeneXus's user interface has room for improvement."

"Code generation is highly time-consuming for GeneXus"

"There are issues in integrating it with other solutions, like Control V."

"GeneXus is a wonderful tool for the backend. It's the best in the world, but for the frontend, GeneXus needs to improve. There should be easier steps for managing various aspects, such as alerts and messages to show to the end-users."

"The tool needs to be tuned before being used. You need some experience to get the best out of the tool."

"We would like to see more extensions and more user controls added to the front-end of this solution, in order to help developers manage the website."

"The front-end with GeneXus is not as good as the back-end."

"It's expensive for a company."

More GeneXus cons

"If you're doing some, for example, extremely responsive applications for the web, it's not as good."

"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."

"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

"There are some bugs in VBCS."

"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."

"The tool has minor bugs."

"My honest opinion is: do not use this solution — there are plenty of free options out there that will do the trick."

"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of a GeneXus license is extremely high. At the same time, one person using the solution can do the work of three Java or data developers. I think that's why they charge so much. It's too expensive, which is one reason it isn't widely used."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten"

"This solution offers multi-plan licenses, depending on the size of the company and the features required, as opposed to being priced per user/device."

"I don't know about the price because I am an employee, but I hear it's cheaper than other tools."

"It's expensive. I'd rate it a four out of ten in terms of pricing."

"I know that its licenses are generally per year, and in the past, the license for GeneXus was around $5,000, but I don't know what's the current price of the GeneXus license."

"The tool's price is good."

"People tend to work with GeneXus if it's cheap, but GeneXus does have licensing policies...Moreover, the cost of resourcing work in GeneXus may make it more expensive than other programming languages."

More GeneXus pricing and cost advice

"It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."

"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

16%

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

I actually don't have much experience with pricing, so I can't comment on it right now.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

There was a requirement to build a custom form to raise AI invoices, using Oracle Fusion. We created a form, and another use case was that users wanted to create and update customers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

VBCS is very flexible. If there is a custom solution or requirement that requires doing something out of the box with Oracle Fusion, you can easily achieve it using VBCS. I'd rate the solution eigh...

See all answers

Comparisons

OutSystems vs GeneXus

Compared 11% of the time

Xamarin Platform vs GeneXus

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GeneXus

Compared 8% of the time

Mendix vs GeneXus

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs GeneXus

Compared 6% of the time

More GeneXus Competitors

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 9% of the time

Creatio Studio vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

MATS vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

Comidor vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GeneXus

September 2026

Download GeneXus product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

September 2026

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service product report

Overview

GeneXus quickly implements and integrates technologies like AI, supports multiple languages, and enhances workflow and mobile development. It offers frequent updates for system compatibility and efficient front-end and back-end development.

GeneXus enables multi-language development including C#, Java, and JavaScript, optimizing database connections and supporting mobile applications. Frequent IDE updates ensure compatibility with new systems while its low-code environment enhances efficiency. Integration with tools like DevOps enhances version control, and it runs on servers like IIS, Azure, and Tomcat, saving time and reducing costs. Despite strengths, users seek improved documentation, enhanced front-end capabilities, modern components, and better integration. Expanded community resources, security features, performance, and faster code generation are highlighted areas for improvement along with increased awareness and support.

What are the key features of GeneXus?

Quick Implementation: Facilitates swift deployment.
Seamless Integration: Supports AI and emerging technologies.
Language Support: Offers development in C#, Java, JavaScript, and more.
Mobile Development: Enhances app creation across platforms.
Frequent Updates: Ensures compatibility with new systems.
DevOps Integration: Facilitates efficient versioning and tool integration.

What are the benefits users should look for?

Efficiency: Rapid code generation and integration save time.
Cost Savings: Optimizes database reorganization reducing expenses.
Flexibility: Supports deployment across multiple servers and platforms.
Improved Workflow: Enhances project management and process modeling.

GeneXus is utilized for web development and applications across web and mobile platforms. It integrates enterprise systems and generates code in C Sharp, CSS, and JavaScript. Companies apply its frameworks for project management within industries such as insurance, banking, social, and medical sectors, predominantly in South America.

GeneXus

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service delivers a low-code environment featuring drag-and-drop capabilities for seamless development without vendor locks, ensuring scalability and versatility.

Offering drag-and-drop functionality and a low-code environment, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service supports both beginners and experienced developers by integrating JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, enhanced with Oracle JET packages. This service facilitates browser-based development and easy integration with existing systems. However, improvement is needed in its licensing structure, functionality for less experienced developers, and native mobile development support. Performance can be affected by minor bugs, especially with complex tasks.

What are the key features?

Drag-and-Drop Builder: Simplifies UI/UX development with intuitive design tools.
Low-Code Environment: Accelerates application development with minimal coding.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS for complex scenarios.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs with robust architecture.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed resources for assistance and learning.
Action Chains & Trigger Events: Enhances application interactivity and functionality.

What should users consider for ROI?

Development Speed: Reduces time to market with efficient design tools.
Cost Effectiveness: Offers long-term savings compared to custom coding solutions.
Flexibility: Supports diverse business applications from case management to AI invoices.
System Integration: Works seamlessly with Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP.

Businesses leverage Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service in industries like legal, healthcare, and enterprise resource planning. It aids in developing software for case management, creating worklists for medical companies, and extending Oracle SaaS applications. Companies also benefit from its capability to build custom forms and streamline business processes.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Canal de Panamá, Gerdau, Coca-Cola, Mercado Libre, DHL, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, TECNISA, Mexican Polak Group, Ferrovalle, Canon, Azteca, KPMG, TURBUS, Santander, BBVA

Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products

Buyer's Guide

GeneXus vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

September 2026

Free Report: GeneXus vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about GeneXus vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GeneXus vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.