GitHub CoPilot vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service comparison

GitHub and Oracle are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. GitHub is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5. GitHub holds a 5.8% mindshare in RADS, compared to Oracle’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

GitHub CoPilot

Read 29 GitHub CoPilot reviews

4,315 Views
2,977 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Read 6 Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service reviews

1,099 Views
769 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and GitHub CoPilot compete in the application development and AI coding assistance space. GitHub CoPilot is perceived to have the upper hand due to its AI-driven code completion features, which significantly enhance developer productivity.

Features:Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service facilitates application creation with its drag-and-drop interface, integrates seamlessly with Oracle Cloud, and enhances both web and mobile app development. GitHub CoPilot offers real-time code suggestions, multi-language support, and AI-generated code solutions to assist developers, increasing their coding productivity.

Room for Improvement:Oracle Visual Builder could improve by offering more customizable options and enhancing its user interface to attract developers familiar with coding. It could also offer better support for non-Oracle platforms. GitHub CoPilot could improve by enhancing support for more complex coding scenarios, providing better tuning for enterprise environments, and offering more robust integration with other development tools beyond popular IDEs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Oracle Visual Builder presents an easy deployment model with strong integration within the Oracle ecosystem and offers comprehensive customer service. GitHub CoPilot integrates effortlessly with platforms like Visual Studio Code, requiring minimal setup but offers less traditional customer service, relying more on community and online resources.

Pricing and ROI:Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service has a usage-based pricing model suitable for large-scale deployments within the Oracle ecosystem, providing good ROI for organizations heavily invested in Oracle services. GitHub CoPilot uses a subscription model, appealing to developers focused on immediate productivity gains through its advanced AI features. This model provides a dynamic ROI more centered on individual developer enhancement.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (2nd)

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Low-Code Development Platforms (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 5.8%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot	5.8%
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service	1.2%
Other	93.0%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at Yext Inc

Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration

In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.

Read full review

Sherif Bashar

Head of Digital Solutions at Wind Integrated Solutions

Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day

There are very minor things, like the feature called "action chains," that could use a bit of enhancement. But the team is perfect; they're working on it. An action chain is a sequence of actions triggered by a button or an event. It executes code in order, from top to bottom. For example, it could call a code, call a REST service, and then insert data into a database. It needs enhancement because it can be a bit complex for fresh grads or new developers to understand. It would be better if it was made more readable. That's the main point. But if you have experience, you'll understand it easily. One more thing I want to add about Visual Builder: up until two years ago, it supported native mobile development. That's not available anymore. They replaced native mobile development with progressive web apps, and most customers are complaining about that. We need native mobile development back – the ability to put apps on stores like Google Play or the App Store. That feature is not available right now, and they deprecated it starting in 2024. It's very important. Otherwise, clients go with Flutter or other mobile development tools. It would be good for Oracle to regain that capability. We need the native mobile development feature back.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is easy to integrate."

"Copilot enhanced our productivity through its AI capabilities."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its code suggestion capability, which leverages AI to provide context-aware suggestions."

"The platform's most valuable feature is detecting and suggesting variables based on the existing file context."

"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."

"GitHub Copilot can improve productivity by up to 40%, especially for experienced developers. Senior developers often spend more time reviewing code, which can make the code review process a bit longer."

"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."

"GitHub Copilot code suggestion capabilities are always good."

More GitHub CoPilot pros

"The tool is very easy to use."

"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."

"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The action chains are really helpful, and the trigger event, along with those action chains, has been very helpful."

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

Cons

"Sometimes it requires multiple iterations to get the code I need, like for creating a login page with specific buttons and logic."

"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."

"The technology offered by the product in the retail industry and banking processes has certain shortcomings, making them areas that can be improved."

"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."

"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."

"There are no extensions provided by the product for Eclipse."

"The solution's accuracy and relevance could be improved."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More GitHub CoPilot cons

"The tool has minor bugs."

"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."

"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."

"There are some bugs in VBCS."

"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is costly."

"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"It's affordable."

"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."

"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."

"Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."

"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."

"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."

More GitHub CoPilot pricing and cost advice

"It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."

"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

I am not fully aware of the pricing details as my company manages it, but I recall it was not inexpensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

GitHub CoPilot should be integrated with different IDEs beyond VS Code, as it is currently only supported by VS Code.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

The tool is very easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

I actually don't have much experience with pricing, so I can't comment on it right now.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

There was a requirement to build a custom form to raise AI invoices, using Oracle Fusion. We created a form, and another use case was that users wanted to create and update customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 24% of the time

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 8% of the time

Qodo Gen vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 24% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Java Cloud Service vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot

October 2025

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

October 2025

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service product report

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is a cloud-based software development Platform as a Service (PaaS) and a hosted environment for your application development infrastructure. It provides an open-source standards-based solution to develop, collaborate on, and deploy applications within Oracle Cloud.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

September 2025

Free Report: GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.