GitHub CoPilot vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitHub Logo
991 views|906 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
2,496 views|1,889 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates.""The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features.""The initial setup of the product is easy.""The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities.""When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use.""The document generation features are valuable.""Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later.""GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."

More GitHub CoPilot Pros →

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components.""The tool is very easy to use.""You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time.""The initial setup is easy."

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pros →

Cons
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point.""The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages.""GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement.""The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required.""GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required.""GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved.""The suggestions provided by the product must be improved.""There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."

More GitHub CoPilot Cons →

"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing.""The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement.""The tool has minor bugs.""There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."
  • "GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."
  • "A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
  • "It's affordable."
  • "There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
  • More GitHub CoPilot Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."
  • "It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."
  • More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution.
    Top Answer:I have not used the product much to be able to comment on what needs improvement in it. With the passage of time, I believe that there will be improvements in its prompt response, like ChatGPT… more »
    Top Answer:You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere… more »
    Top Answer:It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability. And you pay per message, so you're charged based on your… more »
    Top Answer:We have two primary use cases across multiple vendors and organizations, mainly in the medical sector. First, we created a unified worklist for a large medical company in Saudi Arabia. This worklist… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    991
    Comparisons
    906
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    451
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    2,496
    Comparisons
    1,889
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,364
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Trained on billions of lines of code, GitHub Copilot turns natural language prompts into coding suggestions across dozens of languages.

    Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is a cloud-based software development Platform as a Service (PaaS) and a hosted environment for your application development infrastructure. It provides an open-source standards-based solution to develop, collaborate on, and deploy applications within Oracle Cloud.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Non Profit13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business55%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise77%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Rapid Application Development Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: April 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 10 reviews while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 18th in Rapid Application Development Software with 4 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.4, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM, ServiceNow and Mendix, whereas Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Studio Creatio, Microsoft Power Apps, Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS.

    See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

    We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.