Frontegg vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Frontegg and Red Hat are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Frontegg is ranked #20, while Red Hat is ranked #18. Frontegg holds a 1.6% mindshare in SSO, compared to Red Hat’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

2,328 Views
1,420 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat Single Sign On

Read 5 Red Hat Single Sign On reviews

1,720 Views
1,703 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Red Hat Single Sign On

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Red Hat Single Sign On and Frontegg are competing products in the Single Sign On market. Based on user reviews, Frontegg appears to be preferred for its feature set and rapid deployment, despite Red Hat SSO having strong integration capabilities and robust security.

Features: Red Hat Single Sign On is known for its comprehensive integration capabilities, robust security features, and extensive customization options. Frontegg is praised for its flexibility, ease of implementation, and user-friendly feature set.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Single Sign On users suggest enhancing its documentation, improving support resources, and simplifying initial setup. Frontegg users indicate the need for better customer service response times, more comprehensive support options, and additional customization capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Single Sign On’s deployment model is well-regarded though complex initially. Frontegg's deployment is straightforward and quick. Red Hat SSO users find customer service response times satisfactory, whereas Frontegg users see a need for faster support responses.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Single Sign On offers a good ROI despite higher setup costs. Frontegg provides excellent value for its price with lower initial costs and better immediate ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

20th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (34th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (14th)

Red Hat Single Sign On

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Single Sign On is 1.5%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat Single Sign On	1.5%
Frontegg	1.6%
Other	96.9%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

it_user1660836

DevOps Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system

It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file. For security certifications, we need to make sure we can restore all of our products and data in minimal time. We are backing up the data using the API but it will be better to export everything to an external file so in case of a disaster or mistake from our side, we can have the option to reload all the users and assign them to the relevant tenant as fast as possible

Read full review

Giovanni Baruzzi

Owner at Syntlogo GmbH

A stable and flexible solution with some basic capabilities

I set up Red Hat Single Sign-On in half an hour. I had to install a single sign-on solution for a customer. I reviewed a list of all available products, which were no more than fifty, and analyzed them. I chose it because it was convincing, modern, and based on technology from 2015. I put my trust in this product, and after nine years, I feel confident in my decision. Deploying this solution usually takes half an hour. You need an operating system running, then deploy the packages and prepare the interfaces. I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Frontegg enabled us to worry less about parts of the system that are not unique to our product, and instead spend more time developing out key value propositions."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"The frontend side is a major benefit that I am happy I can give my customers from day one, without compromising."

"SaaS companies like ours can just focus on what matters and not spend time on building SaaS essentials such as audit logs, SSO etc."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"In addition, I was most impressed with Frontegg's quick turnaround to fix bugs and implement feature improvements."

More Frontegg pros

"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."

"Good support for single sign-on protocols."

"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."

"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."

"I like that the solution is open source and you can use a commercial edition of it without any charge."

"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."

"The solution is flexible and has the same basic capabilities right out of the box. The most important feature of this product is that it is a Red double-sided product. One side is a well-known open-source project; the other is a Red Hat commercial product. The commercial product benefits from all the experience and contributions of the community, making it a very well-developed product."

Cons

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file."

"The PHP SDK is limited."

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"The product’s technical support services could be better."

"I think they could provide additional features in terms of users trying to manipulate the system with regard to security."

"Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources."

"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."

"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."

"Security could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The license is around $8000 USD."

"If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."

"Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."

"It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

No data available

Comparisons

Auth0 Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 16% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 12% of the time

Okta Platform vs Frontegg

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Frontegg

Compared 5% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Auth0 Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 23% of the time

Okta Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 20% of the time

OneLogin by One Identity vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 7% of the time

AWS IAM Identity Center vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 6% of the time

More Red Hat Single Sign On Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

August 2026

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

August 2026

Download Red Hat Single Sign On product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO

Overview

Frontegg offers seamless SSO onboarding, granular role management, and robust RBAC/ABAC. It enhances security with webhooks and audit logs, supports Python and Flask, and delivers modern security with reCaptcha and MFA, all via an efficient admin console with React components.

Frontegg provides a comprehensive authentication and user management platform, facilitating quick implementation for SaaS companies with multi-tenancy needs. Its integration capabilities with Gmail and LinkedIn, coupled with granular permissions and React components, streamline frontend management. Despite minor limitations in the PHP SDK and requests for enhancements in user management and documentation, Frontegg's speed of bug fixes and transparent roadmap support development efforts, allowing organizations to focus on their core applications.

What are Frontegg's key features?

SSO: Facilitates seamless user onboarding.
Granular Roles and Permissions: Offers fine-tuned access control.
RBAC and ABAC Models: Enhances security policies.
Webhooks and Audit Logs: Improve organizational security.
Multi-tenant Design: Simplifies customer management.
Integration with Python and Flask: Eases development processes.
reCaptcha and MFA Policies: Delivers modern security standards.
React Login Components: Supports efficient user interface management.

Why should users evaluate Frontegg?

Quick Implementation: Saves time in deploying key features.
Transparent Roadmap: Aligns with development efforts.
Multi-tenancy Support: Addresses complex application needs.
Integration Capabilities: Enhances existing workflows and systems.

Many SaaS companies leverage Frontegg to incorporate user management, webhooks, and SSO efficiently. Its granular permissions and multi-tenancy support align well in industries requiring complex structures. Frontegg's integration options and agile features enable organizations to focus on their principal applications while relying on Frontegg for flexible authentication and management needs.

Frontegg

Red Hat Single Sign On is an open-source platform offering fast, scalable, and customizable SSO solutions. It supports popular protocols and integrates with social logins and enterprise solutions to provide seamless authentication across applications.

Red Hat Single Sign On provides fast and flexible authentication, enhancing security across different applications. It supports standardized SSO protocols like OpenID Connect and integrates easily with multiple platforms. Its open-source nature, backed by Red Hat's commercial support, allows community contributions and adaptable capabilities. However, it could improve its integration with Windows products and enhance its security features, including detection mechanisms and audit reports. Scalability and documentation are key areas for development, and users seek advanced tracking for unauthorized access attempts.

What are the key features of Red Hat Single Sign On?

Open Source: Community-driven with extensive documentation and flexibility for customization.
SSO Protocol Support: Compatible with standard protocols like OpenID Connect for seamless integration.
Social Login Integration: Easily integrates with social platforms, enhancing user experience.
Scalable Design: Efficiently handles authentication across multiple clusters.
Commercial Support: Backed by Red Hat for professional support and reliability.

What benefits or ROI should be evaluated when considering Red Hat Single Sign On?

Enhanced Security: Streamlined processes reduce risk, ensuring secure access across applications.
Flexibility: Open-source nature offers adaptable functionality for diverse requirements.
Community Contributions: Benefits from continuous improvements and new features.
Cost-Effective: Transition from Keycloak to paid subscription offers robust capabilities.

Industries, especially those requiring robust security and scalability, implement Red Hat Single Sign On to manage authentication. It integrates with enterprise solutions and identity providers, streamlining login processes and reducing complexities. Organizations appreciate its adaptability when transitioning from Keycloak, experiencing enhanced application authentication and password security.

Red Hat

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

September 2026

Free Report: Frontegg vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.