Frontegg vs Microsoft Entra External ID comparison

Frontegg and Microsoft are both solutions in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category. Frontegg is ranked #9, while Microsoft is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.5. Frontegg holds a 5.8% mindshare in CIaA, compared to Microsoft’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

840 Views
569 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra External ID

Read 8 Microsoft Entra External ID reviews

469 Views
311 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Microsoft Entra External ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Frontegg and Microsoft Entra External ID are two competing solutions in the identity management sector. Frontegg seems to have the upper hand in integration and flexibility, whereas Microsoft Entra External ID stands out for its extensive feature set favored by enterprises.

Features: Frontegg provides advanced user authentication, seamless integration, and rapid implementation. Microsoft Entra External ID offers enterprise-grade security, robust identity verification, and conditional access policies, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive identity management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Entra External ID delivers a streamlined deployment model with comprehensive enterprise support for a superior onboarding experience. Frontegg emphasizes a straightforward setup process with highly flexible deployment options, allowing for quick implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Frontegg's cost-effective setup allows for faster ROI, attracting businesses seeking rapid deployment with minimal upfront costs. Microsoft Entra External ID, though potentially involving higher initial costs, offers significant returns due to its advanced features, making it a valuable investment for companies requiring extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra External ID Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra External ID

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

9th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (18th), Authentication Systems (30th)

Microsoft Entra External ID

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (13th), Microsoft Security Suite (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 5.8%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra External ID is 7.7%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1645395

Developer at Kovrr

Intuitive with reCaptcha integration and helpful technical support

Frontegg's solution fits us very well, as it removes the extra work of developing, maintaining, storing, and securing all of the user-management platforms. It saves us a lot of time and money every single day. Frontegg allows our organization to focus on what matters - creating meaningful, innovative solutions for our customers without wasting time and energy on problems that were already solved by the industry many, many times before. Without Frontegg, our dev velocity would have been compromised greatly, since we would have to invest in a lot of resources to maintain a properly secured, granular, and flexible user-management framework.

Read full review

Corrado Vigano

Sales Manager - Program Manger at Altitudo srl

Solution integrates well with existing systems while being easy to use

The fact that it is quite integrated into the entire Microsoft environment makes it quite easy to use. Furthermore, Microsoft's reliability in providing a clear roadmap for the solution is very important, especially at a time when cybersecurity is a risk in every company. The solution is easy to reuse and not difficult to find expertise for in the market because it is widespread. It is gaining attention even from partners and from the market on the offering side. This serves as a good starting point for customers who can develop internal competence on the solution. Additionally, the presence of reliable partners who know the solution and can provide internal knowledge is the best aspect for them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"The most beneficial feature for us is the ease of setup. With about five clicks, we can generate unique IDs and keys and set up in less than 30 minutes. We can also generate these for multiple years simultaneously, which is convenient."

"The single sign-on access is the most useful feature we use."

"The most valuable feature for me is the firewall capabilities."

"It's quite easy to manage and monitor."

"It's similar to using a Microsoft account to create accounts on other websites. We are also using Microsoft Entra to monitor which applications our guests are using. This allows us to filter, block, or adjust permissions for these applications as needed for our collaborators."

"The fact that it is quite integrated into the entire Microsoft environment makes it quite easy to use."

"The most valuable feature for me is the firewall capabilities."

"The fact that it is quite integrated into the entire Microsoft environment makes it quite easy to use."

More Microsoft Entra External ID pros

Cons

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"The cost is very high."

"Technical support needs improvement."

"There is room for improvement in AI technology for Microsoft Entra External ID, particularly in providing detailed alerts."

"I would like to see faster synchronization."

"The quality of Microsoft customer support varies. With an enterprise contract, good resources are usually provided, especially in regions like Saudi Arabia or UAE. However, we have faced challenges with support quality, especially in some subcontinent areas where the resources might not be as experienced."

"A common concern among the customers I visit is the unpredictability of Microsoft's costs at every renewal. This is really bothersome for the customer, and I would say it is the worst element I have seen in these years."

"Single sign-on for external applications such as Oracle could be improved to be a little bit cheaper."

"Microsoft's pricing is complex and difficult to fathom due to a range of different licensing options."

More Microsoft Entra External ID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We don't pay separately for Microsoft Entra External ID as it's part of our Microsoft Exchange subscription."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

Government

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Entra External ID?

The cost can be a factor for Microsoft Entra External ID, but in general, it offers a scalable and efficient solution compared to deploying individual solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra External ID?

Some areas where Microsoft Entra External ID could improve include cost and enhanced security for integration with federated logins like LinkedIn and Gmail.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra External ID?

I am working on a project for a university where we are trying to create a digital twin of a coral reef restoration project in Saudi Arabia. This involves using a big data platform and developing a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Frontegg

Compared 64% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 14% of the time

Descope vs Frontegg

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 10% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra External ID

Compared 33% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Entra External ID

Compared 22% of the time

Okta Customer Identity vs Microsoft Entra External ID

Compared 14% of the time

AWS Directory Service vs Microsoft Entra External ID

Compared 7% of the time

JumpCloud vs Microsoft Entra External ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra External ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

April 2025

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra External ID

April 2025

Download Microsoft Entra External ID product report

Also Known As

No data available

Azure Active Directory External Identities

Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

Microsoft Entra External ID, part of Microsoft Entra, provides highly secure digital experiences for partners, customers, citizens, patients, or any users outside your organization with customization controls. Combine external identities and user directories in one portal to seamlessly manage access across the organization.

Microsoft Entra External ID refers to all the ways you can securely interact with users outside of your organization. If you want to collaborate with partners, distributors, suppliers, or vendors, you can share your resources and define how your internal users can access external organizations. If you're a developer creating consumer-facing apps, you can manage your customers' identity experiences.

With External ID, external users can "bring their own identities." Whether they have a corporate or government-issued digital identity, or an unmanaged social identity like Google or Facebook, they can use their own credentials to sign in. The external user’s identity provider manages their identity, and you manage access to your apps with Entra ID or Entra External ID to keep your resources protected.

The following capabilities make up External ID:

B2B collaboration - Collaborate with external users by letting them use their preferred identity to sign in to your Microsoft applications or other enterprise applications (SaaS apps, custom-developed apps, etc.). B2B collaboration users are represented in your directory, typically as guest users.
B2B direct connect - Establish a mutual, two-way trust with another Azure AD organization for seamless collaboration. B2B direct connect currently supports Teams shared channels, enabling external users to access your resources from within their home instances of Teams. B2B direct connect users aren't represented in your directory, but they're visible from within the Teams shared channel and can be monitored in Teams admin center reports.
Azure AD B2C - Publish modern SaaS apps or custom-developed apps (excluding Microsoft apps) to consumers and customers, while using Azure AD B2C for identity and access management.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra External ID

April 2025

Free Report: Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra External ID

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra External ID and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra External ID report.

See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.